Originally posted by @Chris Levarek:
@David Lao Quite simply, if you make a 100k, you are paying 30-40k taxes on a typical W-2 salary. To achieve this, you need to be married or file jointly with a real estate professional and thus have 30-40k in depreciation, not 100k. This is doable, it just takes one person filing taxes to qualify as a real estate professional and find some investment that provides 30-40k in losses from the investment.
This is entirely doable. If of course, your life and personal situation complies :) I have done this for three years now.
For this thought exercise, let's assume the RE professional requirement has been met, and that the net rental income (excluding depreciation) equals $0.
Isn't 100K of gross taxable income less 30K of depreciation equal to 70K of taxable income (i.e., 100K-30K=70K)?
Going back to the original question, "What value of real estate holdings would he need to have enough depreciation to offset $100,000 of gross income (assuming he does not buy commercial real estate)?", 30K of depreciation (assuming the depreciation is not front-loaded via cost segregation), could be obtained from 825K of improvement value (or 1.18M of real estate investments assuming a 70% improvement value). This seems unusually low, but maybe I misunderstood. Thoughts?