Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Daniel E.

Daniel E. has started 24 posts and replied 54 times.

Post: Owe taxes on bankruptcy payments received?

Daniel E.Posted
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 55
  • Votes 4

Hello,

I own one non-performing note. Chapter 11 plan was approved in early 2020. Do I need to report this income? Will I owe taxes?


UPB: $50k

Legal: $85k

2020 Pmts: $15k*

LLC costs related to note (force-placed insurance, legal bills, interest): $12k.

* the vast majority of the payments went to pay the costs of getting to an approved plan. Going forward, they will actually reduce my basis.

Have a borrower who has been fighting foreclosure for 12 months. Chapter 7, mediation, appealing denials, etc.

Borrower has offered to pay $700/mo, which is 50% of thier income. We feel this is unaffordable, and will inevitably end back in FC.

Any creative ideas? We are trying to mitigate the potential that we drop the foreclosure, re-write the note, receive one payment, and are back at square one when they default.

My original plan was to ask them to consent to judgment, and potentially execute a lease. Thoughts??

@Chris Seveney

Post: HELP! Toledo, OH Bowing Basement Wall Quote

Daniel E.Posted
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 55
  • Votes 4

Have a property listed for sale and the seller has pointed out a bowing basement wall. Closing will be contingent on an inspection. We are already out-of-the-money on the deal. 

Given my past experiences, very worried about someone coming out and telling me I need some expensive repair, as this seems to happen across the board - $15k for windows (2nd bid for $5k) $18k basment waterproof (2nd bid 5k)...i could go on and on.

One contractor told me "don't let anyone tell you that you need to fix that wall - it's not necessary". 

Can anyone recommend a structural engineer that can give an honest opinion - not one that is trying to maximize their bid?

Thanks!

Originally posted by @Andy Mirza:
Originally posted by @Daniel E.:
Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

I’m a bit confused.....as far as I know, in a Chapter 7 BK there is no “repayment plan” negotiated.....it’s either catch up and reinstate or the foreclosure auction proceeds, period.  A request for mediation is typically  something between the the borrower and the lender, not involving the Chapter 7 Trustee.

You have the relief from the stay, just proceed with the foreclosure.  Under state/federal law (nothing to do with the BK) you may have to actually have a mediation hearing, but you don’t really have to offer  any “reduced plan”.

How the hell has the borrower missed so many payments that the taxes are $12k behind without the foreclosure having already occurred, assuming they are escrowed.

That's what I did - obtained relief and proceeded with the foreclosure. They asked for additional time to answer the complaint, then requested mediation.  

This is what I am wondering. Do I have to offer any 'reduced plan'? This is not a BK13 where you probably should consider agreeing to whatever plan. 

They are 12 years behind for a multitude of reasons, including the debt sitting with some guy for years and he never did anything with it. Interestingly, I called to check on taxes. They were like whoa, yea, they are way behind, we are referring this directly to foreclosure by the county. Not tax sale, just right to direct foreclosure.

What does your attorney say?

I've never had any OH notes so I don't know how things are done there. I have foreclosed on notes in judicial and non-judicial states so I understand that there are different processes. However, in general, a mediation is not mandatory. Both parties need to agree to move forward. We target notes where the most likely outcome is liquidation. We are open to working with borrowers if they genuinely want to work something out but most want to stay in their properties for as long as they can while paying the minimum amount possible. We generally turn down any mediation requests because our borrowers are not sincere or are incapable of performing on their loans.

Re-reading your post from above, it appears that the court requires that you enter into mediation before proceeding with FC. So, why don't you do what you have to do according to their procedure and then deny the modification based on the millions of reasons you already have, and then proceed to FC in court? Maybe I'm understanding it wrong.

To me, it appears that the borrower is doing everything they can to stall your FC (except for paying you what they owe). Your attorney should understand this. I'd tell him to take the fastest path to FC.

 This was my intention - until some of the above (including mentors outside of bigger pockets) stated that in many cases, you fight/deny a deal in mediation just to spend time and money and the judge eventually does whatever they want. But I think the confusion was that people thought this was a C13 or something.

Lawyers are saying to take the fastest path to FC. 

Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

I’m a bit confused.....as far as I know, in a Chapter 7 BK there is no “repayment plan” negotiated.....it’s either catch up and reinstate or the foreclosure auction proceeds, period.  A request for mediation is typically  something between the the borrower and the lender, not involving the Chapter 7 Trustee.

You have the relief from the stay, just proceed with the foreclosure.  Under state/federal law (nothing to do with the BK) you may have to actually have a mediation hearing, but you don’t really have to offer  any “reduced plan”.

How the hell has the borrower missed so many payments that the taxes are $12k behind without the foreclosure having already occurred, assuming they are escrowed.

That's what I did - obtained relief and proceeded with the foreclosure. They asked for additional time to answer the complaint, then requested mediation.  

This is what I am wondering. Do I have to offer any 'reduced plan'? This is not a BK13 where you probably should consider agreeing to whatever plan. 

They are 12 years behind for a multitude of reasons, including the debt sitting with some guy for years and he never did anything with it. Interestingly, I called to check on taxes. They were like whoa, yea, they are way behind, we are referring this directly to foreclosure by the county. Not tax sale, just right to direct foreclosure.

Originally posted by @Chad U.:
Originally posted by @Wayne Brooks:

I’m a bit confused.....as far as I know, in a Chapter 7 BK there is no “repayment plan” negotiated.....it’s either catch up and reinstate or the foreclosure auction proceeds, period.  A request for mediation is typically  something between the the borrower and the lender, not involving the Chapter 7 Trustee.

You have the relief from the stay, just proceed with the foreclosure.  Under state/federal law (nothing to do with the BK) you may have to actually have a mediation hearing, but you don’t really have to offer  any “reduced plan”.

How the hell has the borrower missed so many payments that the taxes are $12k behind without the foreclosure having already occurred, assuming they are escrowed.

 My sentiments exactly.  This sounds like a BK13 not a BK7 as I inquired above, since in BK7 once its dismissed or discharged which is generally 4-6 months, you can resume the foreclosure if they did not intend to keep the property.  The mediation request must have been done outside the BK.  

 That is correct. We received relief from stay in the chapter 7. The mediation request was done in the foreclosure, outside of the BK.

My confusion still exist in how they can fight/delay the foreclosure after discharge/relief from stay. 

Post: Toledo Ohio SFR Window Replacement Recommendation

Daniel E.Posted
  • Charlotte, NC
  • Posts 55
  • Votes 4

Looking for a recommendation to replace 18 windows in a single family home in Toledo, Ohio. Contractor or company is fine. Anything you can provide is appreciated! 

John,

I’ll attempt to explain to the best of my knowledge, although I am still figuring this out.

Borrower filed bankruptcy. We obtained relief from stay.

The borrower is now removed from any personal liability on the debt. We can no longer contact them and ask for any payment/workout.

However, they are still on title.

We continued our foreclosure and the borrower was named as a person of interest in the property due to their title ownership. They, along with any other lien holders, people who were named as having an interest, etc, can still object to the foreclosure, by nature of being defendants. 

Borrower filed a motion to extend. 

Borrower filed a motion for mediation. 

I think the take-away is that in mediation they can ask to reinstate the mortgage, structure a DIL, who knows. As long as it is somewhat reasonable, the lender should agree. If not, the case will go to trial and the judge can agree to whatever they want to agree to. 

If it is not reasonable and all parties agree there is no real way to pay the mortgage, mediation concludes, with no result, and the foreclosure continues. 

I remain confused how the borrower has been relieved of any liability, but can roll the dice and try to reinstate the mortgage at some crazy non-market rate. They are only a part of it by virtue of being a title holder. They have no liability or debt attached to their name. What are they trying to reinstate?

Maybe someone can explain that piece! 

Thank you all for taking the time to write up your responses. The insight of industry professionals is truly invaluable and I am greatly appreciative.

@Wayne Snell

Thank you for your contribution. Love the ideas. Specifically, "The attorney should argue if it is feasible that can pay for the next 40 years?" That is a real strategy here.

@Chad U.

We do have a BK attorney. They did not state reaffirm or surrender - left it blank. Never responded to any attempts to contact. We obtained relief from stay and continued the foreclosure. 

We did consider property taxes and are more than protected by our all-in basis. However, we are hesitant to advance $12k when a BK judge could make us take $100 payments for the foreseeable future. 

Scenario question:

We are required to accept $100/mo, but nobody pays the taxes. Next month, taxes foreclose. At the sheriffs sale, do the excess proceeds above the taxes come to us?

Have not shared any non-public information. You can look up any of this online.