Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dan Deppen

Dan Deppen has started 6 posts and replied 245 times.

Post: PERMANENT portfolio and VARIABLE portfolio

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249

I do something similar. My PERMANENT portfolio is my SDIRA; I try to buy more solid performing notes that I won't need to work on (although they haven't all panned out that way...). In my LLC I buy more sub-performing and non-performing notes with investor money, that's my version of the VARIABLE portfolio. That side of my portfolio is most definitely a business and not passive at all.

While the note investing world is a small niche, within that world is a wide range of different investment types. You can have 2 different "note investing" models that are entirely different sports.

Post: The Most DANGEROUS Real Estate Investments for the “Amateur” Investor

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Scott Trench:

Wait... the guy who buys all the ads (through Google) on BiggerPockets YouTube videos and attempts to reach BP viewers says that Tax Liens are the best way to build wealth, asking me repeatedly and agressively why I'm not doing it? 

Also, I'd add that any second position debt, preferred equity, or their brother's, sister's or cousins in any shape or form are at #2 on this list, in really any asset class. 

We experienced real estate investors tend to look at most “guru” type training/mentorship as, at the very best, inadequate to provide the new investor with a reasonable pathway to success.  So why is that?  Here is my opinion

1. The “methodology” the guru presents either isn’t all that profitable, isn’t as simple to enact as he suggests, and or works only with certain limits as to economic climate, geographical area, etc.

2. The “training” provided by the guru program lacks teaching of real estate principles, real estate finance and real estate law.  Hence the “student” doesn’t have the foundational knowledge necessary for analysis and decision making

3. The marketer (guru) severely understates the amount of capital, time, and knowledge needed to produce successful results.

And the above mentioned are the BEST case; not even mentioning the guru strategies that are fraudulent, illegal, unethical, and plain not realistically achievable. 

 Lol, those 3 things perfectly describe a program I did with a guru 7 years ago.

Post: The Tech Revolution in Real Estate Lending: Are We Overlooking the Basics?

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249

The world of real estate tends to be pretty medieval from a technology perspective. A financial calculator and legal pad might work in the hands of someone who knows what they are doing, but that doesn't mean it's the best way to do it. A horse and buggy might get me where I want to go, but I'll choose other options.


That being said, just because someone is using an algorithm doesn't mean it's the right one. I'm not familiar with these platforms, but it sounds like they aren't mature enough yet to capture the important nuances that Chris mentioned. Having models is great if you understand their limitations. Self-driving cars are potentially amazing, but they need to capture a lot of nuance and complexities. Give me the horse and buggy vs a self driving car with immature software and sensors any day.

My point is you should use as much technology as you can to make your life easier without going beyond its limits, and in the meantime always be on the lookout for new solutions that solve problems without creating new ones. Having worked for both tech startups and large tech companies, there is a tendency for organizations to focus on one competency, usually the one that the founder has. To build a platform like that, you definitely need technical skills, but it needs to be informed by real estate domain experts as well. You also need UX, support, quality, a million other things. You can't just solve one piece of the puzzle and then ignore other important pieces.

Post: Owner Financing Empty Lots

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Luke H.:
Quote from @Joe S.:
Quote from @Luke H.:
Happy New Year to all reading this!

I am considering purchasing empty lots priced roughly $10-15K below market value.
My plan is to offer owner financing for the land.
These lots have water, drainage, and electric connections available, and mobile homes are permitted.
The area is experiencing significant development, with the lots surrounded by new single-family homes.

I would really appreciate any advice, feedback, or suggestions.
Thank you


 It would help if you shared what you plan to buy them for other than just saying they’re 10 k to 15 K below market.

  • List Price: $55K
  • My Offer: $45K

Planned Value Add:

  • Install fence
  • Build driveway
  • Create a mobile home pad

Exit Strategy:

  • Sell via owner financing
  • Considering the option of adding a mobile home as well


    If you like this post, please consider voting!

 What are the costs for the value adds, the expected hold time, and the expected sale price? 

Post: Due On Sale Being Called!!

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249

I could be misunderstanding how this deal was structured, but wouldn't the seller who is on the underlying mortgage have an incentive not to let it go into foreclosure since their credit is at stake?

Post: Owner Financing Empty Lots

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Luke H.:
Quote from @Dan Deppen:
Quote from @Luke H.:
Quote from @Zach Howard:
Quote from @Luke H.:
Happy New Year to all reading this!

I am considering purchasing empty lots priced roughly $10-15K below market value.
My plan is to offer owner financing for the land.
These lots have water, drainage, and electric connections available, and mobile homes are permitted.
The area is experiencing significant development, with the lots surrounded by new single-family homes.

I would really appreciate any advice, feedback, or suggestions.
Thank you


 You want to purchase the land with owner financing or sell it that way?

I think you'll have to show more numbers to see whether whatever you plan to do makes sense or not. 

I plan to sale the lots that way. I plan to offer owner financing to others that can't get a loan.
Should I price the land 2 times above market value and offer a low interest rate
OR
Price the land at current market and use a very high rate?

I'd do the latter. It will make the loans more valuable if you ever decide to sell them and decreases the chances of default. 

Would the buyers/borrowers be purchasing with the intent of putting a mobile home on the property and making it their primary residence? If so you'll want to follow Dodd Frank and the other consumer rules.

Yes, buyers will make it primary residence with mobile home or build single family.  If I use a RMLO service I assume they cover the Dodd Frank and other consumer rules? Or am I mixing things here? Thanks

 That's correct, you've got it.

Post: Owner Financing Empty Lots

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Luke H.:
Quote from @Zach Howard:
Quote from @Luke H.:
Happy New Year to all reading this!

I am considering purchasing empty lots priced roughly $10-15K below market value.
My plan is to offer owner financing for the land.
These lots have water, drainage, and electric connections available, and mobile homes are permitted.
The area is experiencing significant development, with the lots surrounded by new single-family homes.

I would really appreciate any advice, feedback, or suggestions.
Thank you


 You want to purchase the land with owner financing or sell it that way?

I think you'll have to show more numbers to see whether whatever you plan to do makes sense or not. 

I plan to sale the lots that way. I plan to offer owner financing to others that can't get a loan.
Should I price the land 2 times above market value and offer a low interest rate
OR
Price the land at current market and use a very high rate?

I'd do the latter. It will make the loans more valuable if you ever decide to sell them and decreases the chances of default. 

Would the buyers/borrowers be purchasing with the intent of putting a mobile home on the property and making it their primary residence? If so you'll want to follow Dodd Frank and the other consumer rules.

Post: How to modify terms of a seller-financed mortgage?

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Ken M.:
Quote from @Jennifer Turner:

Has anyone ever sold a property with seller financing then later extended the repayment period or modified the terms of the loan with the buyers? Or even refinanced it to them?

I’ve been searching for a form or contract I could use to recast or modify the terms of a loan that I seller financed a few years ago, with the intention of lowering the monthly payment for the borrowers and extending the repayment timeline. We also need to add in escrowed taxes and insurance to the new terms, as previously the buyers were responsible for paying them, but we’ve recently had to take that over.

Context:

Subject property is a mobile home on land in the state of FL that is owner occupied by the family who purchased it from our LLC. They have had a difficult year and are struggling to make their payments on time each month. We know they're hard working and would like to continue working with them rather than move toward foreclosure, but we know they're in over their heads if we continue under the current terms of the mortgage and don't want to set them up for failure. Our current mortgage terms include a late fee after 5 days, so they're already paying extra each month and have to split the total monthly payment up between 2-3 payments when they get their pay check. The monthly payment is only ~$720 and the interest rate is fixed at 8% fully amortized with no balloon. I know they would be worse off refinancing at today's rates even if they could find an alternative lender able to lend on older mobile homes. And given their recent late payment history, I don't know that they'd qualify with another lender.

We have an upcoming meeting with them to see how we can extend the loan a few more years to make the total monthly payment including installments for the annual property tax bill, which we’ve had to pay for them this year since they were late the last couple years and had to pay interest to the county. 

This is the only property we’ve ever seller financed, in case that clears up any questions you have about Dodd-Frank compliance implications. They hold title, and the mortgage and promissory note were attorney drafted and filed at our local county. 

I do plan to consult my real estate attorney who handled the closing but this is his busiest week of the year, so I definitely don’t want to bug him with something that isn’t extremely urgent until after the New Year. In the meantime I would love to have some helpful information or ideas to share with the buyers when we meet and ideally an agreement/contract we could fill out together once new terms are agreed to and then share that with the attorney so he could draft up the formal instrument for recording.

If you have experience with this type of scenario, I’d love to hear any recommendations you have or any helpful resources you could point me to for the appropriate paperwork.

Under foreclosure laws, you have to send appropriate notices and try to work with the borrower and offer a loan mod before foreclosure anyway. That is not a particularly hard thing to do, but you need to put it in writing and execute a new note for the loan mod.

HUD does a non interest bearing 2nd that you might want to consider doing. That is, they take the arrears, the late fees and any legal fees and they create a 2nd. The borrower simple starts remaking payments at a given agreed upon date. You could set the date out a couple of months to give the borrower some breathing room. That way, you can or choose not, to make a change to the original note.


 You aren't required to offer a loan mod prior to foreclosure. Is there a particular state or scenario that calls for this? I know PA has a process to go through before you start a foreclosure, but have never seen a requirement to offer a mod.

Post: Getting A Deed In Lieu at closing to store away

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Dan Deppen:
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Peter Walther:

I think you'll find most, if not all title insurers, will require the DIL to be dated and executed subsequent to default in order to insure.  In addition, the Grantor will probably be required to sign the same seller's affidavit that are needed for a non DIL closing.  Here's a short treatise by a title insurer:

A deed in lieu of foreclosure is a deed given by the owner of mortgaged property to the holder of the mortgage or its designee where the mortgage is in default and foreclosure is a possibility. A deed is given and accepted as an alternative to ("in lieu of") foreclosure. Unlike a foreclosure, a deed in lieu of foreclosure does not extinguish any of the liens and encumbrances affecting the property.


Most courts recognize the execution of a deed in lieu of foreclosure in a transaction subsequent to the original mortgage transaction as a legitimate alternative to foreclosure proceedings. However, deeds in lieu of foreclosure can be subject to judicial attack by their grantors and their grantors' creditors.

Grounds for attacks on deeds in lieu of foreclosure include the following:

• That the deed was an equitable mortgage - that the parties intended the deed to be given as security for a debt and that the deed was not an absolute conveyance.

• That the deed is either a preferential or fraudulent transaction within the purview of the provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Act or any other related state law.

• That the deed is a device to clog a mortgagor's right of redemption.

• Unfairness of the consideration.

• Coercion, fraud, oppression, duress, and undue influence.

• That the deed is not subsequent to the execution of the mortgage but contemporaneous with it.

• That the grantor/mortgagor was insolvent at the time of the execution of the deed.


An estoppel affidavit (executed and acknowledged by the grantor/mortgagor, attesting to the fairness of the transaction, the consideration exchanged, the value of the property, and other factors showing an intention to make a genuine transfer) or a recital (inserted directly in the deed) are supporting documents used to forestall challenges to these transactions.


State law and local title standards must be consulted in regard to the consideration and treatment of deeds in lieu of foreclosure.


What a GREAT post!   


Thanks. To expand a little on what is mentioned the underwriter's guideline, a DIL does not extinguish subsequent liens, so if the borrower has judgments against him/her/it that attach to the property, the DIL grantee takes title subject to them and may have difficulty getting them released later without payment. In addition, a DIL does not automatically satisfy the underlying mortgage/DOT so if you accept a deed from the DIL grantee you may find a title insurer will require a release or sat of it before insuring.

We have often used a “friendly” foreclosure instead of deed in lieu when we needed to “wipe out” liens junior to ours before taking property title. 

 What's a friendly foreclosure process? I had a non-performing loan once where a borrower would do a deed in lieu, but there was a deceased co-borrower, and my attorney required me to go through the foreclosure process to clear title.

The borrower knows you’re foreclosing and does not contest the foreclosure and “turns over the keys” to the lender. 

 Thanks, got it! That's what mine was. 

Post: Getting A Deed In Lieu at closing to store away

Dan Deppen
Posted
  • Erie, CO
  • Posts 248
  • Votes 249
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Peter Walther:
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Peter Walther:

I think you'll find most, if not all title insurers, will require the DIL to be dated and executed subsequent to default in order to insure.  In addition, the Grantor will probably be required to sign the same seller's affidavit that are needed for a non DIL closing.  Here's a short treatise by a title insurer:

A deed in lieu of foreclosure is a deed given by the owner of mortgaged property to the holder of the mortgage or its designee where the mortgage is in default and foreclosure is a possibility. A deed is given and accepted as an alternative to ("in lieu of") foreclosure. Unlike a foreclosure, a deed in lieu of foreclosure does not extinguish any of the liens and encumbrances affecting the property.


Most courts recognize the execution of a deed in lieu of foreclosure in a transaction subsequent to the original mortgage transaction as a legitimate alternative to foreclosure proceedings. However, deeds in lieu of foreclosure can be subject to judicial attack by their grantors and their grantors' creditors.

Grounds for attacks on deeds in lieu of foreclosure include the following:

• That the deed was an equitable mortgage - that the parties intended the deed to be given as security for a debt and that the deed was not an absolute conveyance.

• That the deed is either a preferential or fraudulent transaction within the purview of the provisions of the federal Bankruptcy Act or any other related state law.

• That the deed is a device to clog a mortgagor's right of redemption.

• Unfairness of the consideration.

• Coercion, fraud, oppression, duress, and undue influence.

• That the deed is not subsequent to the execution of the mortgage but contemporaneous with it.

• That the grantor/mortgagor was insolvent at the time of the execution of the deed.


An estoppel affidavit (executed and acknowledged by the grantor/mortgagor, attesting to the fairness of the transaction, the consideration exchanged, the value of the property, and other factors showing an intention to make a genuine transfer) or a recital (inserted directly in the deed) are supporting documents used to forestall challenges to these transactions.


State law and local title standards must be consulted in regard to the consideration and treatment of deeds in lieu of foreclosure.


What a GREAT post!   


Thanks. To expand a little on what is mentioned the underwriter's guideline, a DIL does not extinguish subsequent liens, so if the borrower has judgments against him/her/it that attach to the property, the DIL grantee takes title subject to them and may have difficulty getting them released later without payment. In addition, a DIL does not automatically satisfy the underlying mortgage/DOT so if you accept a deed from the DIL grantee you may find a title insurer will require a release or sat of it before insuring.

We have often used a “friendly” foreclosure instead of deed in lieu when we needed to “wipe out” liens junior to ours before taking property title. 

 What's a friendly foreclosure process? I had a non-performing loan once where a borrower would do a deed in lieu, but there was a deceased co-borrower, and my attorney required me to go through the foreclosure process to clear title.