Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Dallas Hayden

Dallas Hayden has started 2 posts and replied 62 times.

Originally posted by @Bud Gaffney:

I've never heard of this. Talk to the board about changing this rule. Turnover = wear and tear on common areas etc. Wouldn't everyone want long term tenants? Something sounds off to me...

With rent rates increasing so quickly, I suspect OP wants more flexibility in his lease. Suspect he doesn't want to be stuck with a below-market rate at the end of the lease. Another issue is longer-term rentals IMO offer fewer opportunities for inspections/ more opportunities for damage. I'm not crazy about long-term rentals either. 

Hey Fabian,

Sounds like you have some fantastic deal-finding abilities and already lots of experience! As a fellow younger investor, I recommend focusing on cash flow for the shorter term. I'd suggest pursuing a parallel RE career to help there. Perhaps you could move for your real estate agent license? The experience, connections, and knowledge you will gain can help tremendously with your future investments. 

A few years ago, I secured my Irrigator's license after attending college. Now I'm applying to law school with a focus on RE. I advise always keeping your income-generation options open. I know people in TX who didn't and were wiped out in the 1986 Savings and Loan crisis.

Best of luck!

Originally posted by @Mary M.:

@Jim K. - Glue traps are inhumane and should not ever be used.  (This is not a joke, they torture the poor critter(s) that gets stuck).....   

As for the situation, where is the OPs PM? why are they not interacting with the tenant? 

Also, PMs are notorious for spending far too much of an owners money so OP needs to immediately set limits on what the PM is allowed to approve expense wise - I would set it at 0 (or $50) this way you can approve all expenditures - 

I understand tenants dont like crawly things, and if this were me I would probably have a discussion with them letting them know spiders are good and protect the home from flies and many other not good insects.  But I dot think I would spray any kind of poison.....

IMO cultural pest control practices are best. Heavy spider infestations can be a sign of water damage or rot. The spider migration may even indicate a termite infestation... Treat/remove the food source and the spiders will become less of an issue. Spiders are unaffected by most insecticides anyway. 

Originally posted by @Zachary Fix:

@Tom Gimer in Texas if the easement is continuous and uninterrupted for at least ten years it can a prescriptive easement. The only limitations would be certain limitations and stipulations as to when the prescriptive period begins. For example, the period will not run if the owner of the servient estate is suffering under a legal disability such as infancy or insanity or is the ward of an estate when the adverse use begins. The period will run once the disability is removed. An intervening disability occurring after the period has started will not suspend (or toll) the running of the prescriptive period.

I am not a lawyer and every states laws are different. It is always best to check with a local  real estate attorney for easement issues. 

 

OP, definitely talk to a lawyer about this issue if you want to pursue it further. Unless things have changed recently, this advice is generally not accurate in Texas. Easements in TX are complex and case law has evolved over time. I'm also not an attorney either but deal with easement issues fairly routinely. 

If this is a rental, install a grease trap. 

Sorry to hear about the situation! What does your contract say? 

P.S. Definitely do your own research on remediation. Regulations/requirements may vary by location and this doesn't constitute professional advice:

I've helped remediate a couple buildings and IMO the best solution is to toss all porous things and thoroughly clean all hard surfaces. I've never had any luck with o-zone. Do you have a hardwood floor? If so, worst case you may need to sand and reseal. Wet clean and paint the walls and ceiling. 

A bathroom at one of my properties (purchased through a tax sale) came with human feces on every surface (and a giant pile in the tub). I just threw on a suit, gloves, boots, etc. and started shoveling it out. The fridge was filled with liquified rotten meat and kitchen was covered in maggots. Now after a thorough clean and paint the place smells nearly brand new.

Post: inflated natural gas bills?

Dallas HaydenPosted
  • Posts 63
  • Votes 48
Originally posted by @Eron A.:
Originally posted by @Dallas Hayden:
Originally posted by @Eron A.:
Originally posted by @Cory Dessauer:
this is summer time. basically I'm paying 158 bucks a month to run a water heater. I figured switching to electric would be my best option. the feesareahats killing. Im paying 570% of the cost of the received gas to receive the gas.

has anything changed with your situation? im thinking of buying a house that uses gas.

sidenote: im the type of guy who can live in a cold house. i just need a lil hat and some a warm joggers. ill even go as far as wearing long johns. f that heat. a better alternative is to buy yourself a crypto miner. them things make so much heat. theyre just loud. too loud.

Gas is critical for 2 things these days: larger tankless water heaters and higher quality stoves. Otherwise, electric can work very well. 

 Can you say more? Why do you say its critical for those things?

Tankless water heaters run only on-demand and require a tremendous amount of power to heat water quickly. Even smaller electric ones can require multiple 40a breakers. Once you approach 10 gpm electric power demands would be prohibitive for standard residential electric services. 

Who wants to pay top dollar for a culinary grade electric stove when gas is available? Electric doesn't cook as well. 

Post: inflated natural gas bills?

Dallas HaydenPosted
  • Posts 63
  • Votes 48
Originally posted by @Eron A.:
Originally posted by @Cory Dessauer:
this is summer time. basically I'm paying 158 bucks a month to run a water heater. I figured switching to electric would be my best option. the feesareahats killing. Im paying 570% of the cost of the received gas to receive the gas.

has anything changed with your situation? im thinking of buying a house that uses gas.

sidenote: im the type of guy who can live in a cold house. i just need a lil hat and some a warm joggers. ill even go as far as wearing long johns. f that heat. a better alternative is to buy yourself a crypto miner. them things make so much heat. theyre just loud. too loud.

Gas is critical for 2 things these days: larger tankless water heaters and higher quality stoves. Otherwise, electric can work very well. 

Originally posted by @Kaiser Saeed:
Hi, Your comments helped to get mentally prepared and what to expect as I dealt with city over the past few days. Thank You, all!
What I am able to find is consistent with the overall comments - land development is builder's responsibility. However, the answer to specific question about road development was not as straight answer. If the road is private (gated community) than it's definitely builders to build, but if it's public road than Public Works should develop roads requiring me to sign the deed of that portion of land to the city. Which I don't see a problem with. However, getting Public Works to decide or agree on this in a timely fashion is a different animal. From my conversations, it will be a difficult hill to climb to get the Public Works to develop the road.
When a good land opportunity comes along, there isn't enough time to align all of this before putting an offer up... so all in all, I will accept builder to do complete land development as default position. If any upside happens, its blessing from above.

Not sure what you are talking about with Public Works. I don't know of a City in N Texas that will pay to install public roads just to serve a private development. Why should they finance your development with public dollars?! Frankly, I would be pissed off if I discovered that my community was using my tax dollars to install streets in a private development. IMO you should be grateful if a City agrees to take over long-term public maintenance of your streets. 

Regardless of time elapsed, the driveway may or may not be an easement issue depending on many factors. Suggest consulting with an attorney if you decide to pursue this property. Would the 2' impact your ability to redevelop the property in the future? Would it make the lot "non-conforming"?