Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Craig Jones

Craig Jones has started 16 posts and replied 95 times.

Well, looks like the equity in our two properties alone creates an expected family contribution (EFC) higher than the annual cost of just about any school.  Even with $0 income.

It was a fun idea to think about though ðŸ˜Š

Quote from @Michael Baum:

Yeah I don't know what you think you are going to get out of it. The FAFSA takes into account your actual income and not your after deduction income.

AGI I am pretty sure when I filled out the last FAFSA for 2023 before my son went on to grad school.


What I am saying is that depreciation-based losses brought our AGI pretty close to zero both years.  If FAFSA is based primarily on that number, then things could work out well.

We had STR depreciation losses that wiped out most of our W-2 income in 2023 and 2024.

And also a kid applying to college this fall.

Anyone else been in that situation?  I am very curious to see what the FAFSA formulas will make of it.  Would love to hear others' experience.

Quote from @Sarah Kensinger:

@Andrew Steffens Is right on with how to use Airdna! Most people don't take the time to learn how to use the data correctly or they've only used it a handful of times and not hundreds/thousands of times. I don't know where the thought that Airdna isn't accurate came from, but they have a system and process for pulling the numbers they do. I just underwrote a house this week using Airdna, I also had the numbers from the owner that the property made last year. And wouldn't you know Airdna was spot on! Lenders use them to decide if a property is worth lending on, and so do many of the major STR PM. If it was that off those companies/banks would consider it a data point to avoid. Airdna is about to add a bunch of neat features soon, and they'll pretty much trump every STR data source. Can't wait to see and use what coming!


AirDNA can scrape the occupancy and ADR for that exact property directly from AirBnB. So it's always going to be spot-on for a property that's already in use as an STR.

Quote from @Julio Gonzalez:

As others have mentioned, you can do as many cost seg studies as you want in a year. However, there are a lot of factors to consider when get a cost seg study to determine if the benefits outweigh the costs. If you are able to get REPS status, that would help tremendously. Have you obtained any detailed cost/benefit analysis quote? Most cost segregation study companies provide the quote for free. Is it a reputable company and will the documentation provided from the study hold up in an audit? If you need any help or have any questions, feel free to reach out!

Everyone here on this thread is talking about the corner case where the property's average stay duration is 7 days or less and the property is self-managed (i.e. you can meet one of the standard material participation criteria).  In that case, the rental activity is considered non-passive and a loss generated by cost seg + bonus depreciation can offset other non-passive income including W-2.  Even without REPS status.

I'm pretty sure this was meant to exempt lodging (i.e. hotels/motels) from passive loss limitation rules.  And not really intended to benefit high W-2 earners running STRs on the side, which is a thing that didn't even exist when that tax code was created.  For this reason, I think the "loophole" word is fair game.  But also, fair game to apply it to STRs since there's no ruling to the contrary.

Great post AJ. And exactly why I've turned my attention away from SFR STRs and toward small commercial properties that are totally outside the STR permitting regime.

This place is my prototypical ideal:  https://www.lochlevenlodge.com/

Amazing location, year-round demand, exempt from heavy-handed local STR regulation and permit caps. And also way, way underperforming. No OTA distribution, no dynamic pricing. You can call them or book a room on their website if you happen to know they exist.

You could easily run that place STR style with keycode locks on the rooms. No need for staff beyond cleaning and maintenance which can be outsourced.

Totally not for sale, no way, no how.  Believe me, I've tried ðŸ˜Š


But!  Search your memory bank.  You know other places like this near you or where you've vacationed.  Mom and pop are ready to retire and you can do it better.

EXTRAORDINARY profits are still there for folks with STRs in markets that have lots of demand, hard limits on the number of STR permits available, and 2021 mortgages below 3%.

Building and planning code in my jurisdiction includes fences.  That one would for sure be a code violation here, both in terms of construction and appearance.

I haven't noticed a change in bookings either after I made this switch.  I believe the map view on AirBnB now shows the total price for the stay including all fees (but not tax).  So it shouldn't put you at any disadvantage if your nightly price is higher (but has AirBnB's cut rolled into it) while other properties have a lower nightly rate but AirBnB's cut is added on top.  

I was just about to post about this.

Under the standard fee model, the guest service fee is about 14.2% and the host service fee is 3%.  So AirBnB gets a 17.2% cut in total.

If you choose "simplified pricing" the host fee is 15% and there's no guest fee.  You can then raise your prices so the guest sees the same total as before, and you actually end up netting 2.2% more.  

Another (minor) benefit is that AirBnB compliments you in front of the guest during the booking process:

Of course I'm not really covering anything.  The money has just moved under a different shell.