Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Connie Tang

Connie Tang has started 4 posts and replied 14 times.

Originally posted by @Bruce Woodruff:

@Connie Tang - You still need to tell us what the rents are before we can really offer guidance......$100 might be fine, or it might be outrageous....

All units are 2 bed/1bath. The rents are currently $1000, $996, and $895. Thank you.

Originally posted by @Scott M.:

Not really enough info.  The % increase varies greatly if current rent is $800 VS 1,600.  Also, market rent generally has homes that are freshly turned.  Some have gone through a lot of renovations to get them in "market" condition.  What is the condition of your units?  Are they "market" ready or are they 100 below market ready?  Two of them are updated and in excellent (I would say market) condition. The other one I would have to paint and get into a better, more updated shape.

What are you doing to verify they are good tenants?   You can ask them, you can ask sellers you can have them sign an estoppel etc but can you ever really know until you know?  I requested a rent roll/proof of timely-received rents. If they have been paying on time, then I consider that a very good start. I also met two of the 3 tenants at the showing and they seemed cool (though I know you can never judge a book by its cover); the cleanliness of everyone's units was encouraging.

You said you will be doing renovations and then added "within the next few years" and the items you mentioned are not necessarily things tenants care about.  Unless the roof is actively leaking they won't care at all. Part of the reason they don't care is because having a roof over their head is part of your job.  It is a requirement of rental housing. Tenants like and care about things like paint, flooring, kitchens, bathrooms, screens, doors, heat, ac, etc.  My point isn't to be a jerk here, it is great you have some renovations planned out just need to temper your expectations on how a tenant may feel differently.  Hey, want to raise your rent 100 a month so I can put a roof on the home isn't going to go over well.  I guess the roof isn't a good example. I don't think you are being a jerk. I need honest help and advice, so I need to hear it straight in order to gain knowledge and understand what is right vs. wrong, otherwise I can't learn. You are totally right about the roof; it's a basic necessity and tenants won't care about a new roof as long as it works properly. The units are all in pretty good shape (all have new flooring). There are definitely opportunities to renovate one of the units, so I'll have to take a closer look at what I can improve there. Another idea I have for adding value and justifying the rent is adding laundry to the basement after I clean it up. Currently, the tenants do not have access to the basement. I would love to build storage locker units for each individual unit and add a coin-op washer/dryer.

In my opinion the best approach is to have an honest conversation with yourself about the condition of the property from the tenants perspective.  If they moved out, would you do anything other then clean up a bit?  if the answer is all you would do is clean and you could attract a new tenant at 100 more a month, then okay, great.  Raise rent.  If the answer is I need to paint and change the floors etc then maybe the rent is proper for the condition.  I do think two of the units are in market condition; the other could use some updating. 

Originally posted by @Will Gaston:

@Connie Tang it would depend on how much the current rents are.

Raising it $100 on somebody paying $3500 = no sweat

Raising it $100 on somebody paying $500 = begging for a vacancy

Makes total sense. Thank you! 

Originally posted by @Jonathan R McLaughlin:

@Connie Tang agrees with @john Underwood with the 50 year assuming the rent is somewhere around the 1k mark. More than 5% is a little rough. Got it.

Go to rentometer and other sources and determine the fair market range. Feel free to share with the tenant that they are under market or the lower end of the range, and you are raising rents gradually out of courtesy since they have been good tenants. Yes, I have done the research and have a good understanding of the fair market range. I plan on doing exactly what you said...raising rents gradually etc.

SO much of doing this smoothly is doing it with the right tone…same action, different feelings produced. Absolutely. I want to do this with the utmost respect, professionalism, fairness, and diplomacy,

Originally posted by @John Underwood:

Do you want market rents or do you want to keep good paying tenants. I want a balance, which is good paying tenants paying rents that will generate some cash flow (I don't have to be at maximum cash flow; I understand it can take some time to get rents up to market). Having non-paying or troublesome tenants is my worst nightmare, but breaking even is also not an option.

After closing I would tell each tenant that you will be equating market rent prices.

I would see which tenants are the drama queens or pay late. 

I then would only raise rents 50 per month at most unless you are trying to run off a tenant. That's fair. Like I said, I have no idea what is too aggressive. I am a complete newbie getting into the REI world...learning, learning, learning!

It may be good to have a conversation with each one and show them what market rents are and what is available to rent nearby.

Then listen. You should get an idea what they think is fair and  what is affordable for them. Don't be greedy if you have great tenants in place already. Agree 100%. I'm definitely not trying to be greedy and the last thing I want is for tenants to think their landlord is greedy. Having great tenants is so important, but I really won't know until I take over the property, which is pretty scary.

Turnovers and repairs will cost you more than not getting full market rents. I take care of my good tenants that take care of me. That is very true.

Hi All,

Seeking your thoughts, insights, personal experience, etc. on this...

I am in the process of purchasing a 3-unit property and would be inheriting the tenants, who are month-to-month. Since the tenants would like to stay, I figured it would be easier to keep them (assuming they are good tenants who have always paid rent on time, which I am in the process of verifying) so that I will have immediate cash flow rather than having to find my own tenants and dealing with vacancy.

My question is, is raising the rent $100 on each tenant to meet market rents (because currently they are below market) too aggressive and offensive? The last thing I want to do is insult anyone, but I feel that it's fair for me to raise rents to market value as the new landlord of the property. I have no idea what kind of landlord they have now and what kind of maintenance he provides, but I want to be the best and most professional landlord for my tenants (hopefully they will notice that I am better than him). If the purchase of this property goes through and I become the owner, I will be doing some renovations (e.g., cleaning up the basement, repainting the exterior, and replacing the roof within the next few years). If I let my tenants know about these things, will they feel less of a sting?

If I follow through with this property, I would be closing in October. My plan is to notify the tenants of new ownership immediately, sending them a "welcome package" and informing them that rents will be $100 more starting in January 2022. This way they have ample time (more than the standard 30-days notice) to decide if they want to stay or leave by the end of the year. 

Please share your honest opinions and let me know if what I'm thinking is fair or if you have a better approach.

Post: LLC for Investment Property

Connie TangPosted
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

Thank you for the advice, @Jeff Rogers. I believe this is a good approach for me as well given I am just starting out with my first investment property.

Thank you for the info and insights, @James Thiel. Your explanation for why people put one house per LLC makes total sense. It's really good to know and quite a relief that I won't be missing out on any tax benefits without the LLC. Anonymity at this point is not a priority for me, albeit it can be advantageous, but asset protection definitely is critical. I've now heard about umbrella insurance as a suggestion from several people, so I think I'm feeling good about going that route, at least for now.

As you can imagine, I have a ton to learn as a first-time real estate investor, but the best way I'll do that is when I acquire my first property and get down and dirty in it. I know I'll make lots of mistakes and will probably have to try different things until I figure out what is best for my circumstances (e.g., if/when/how I should set up my LLC).


Post: LLC for Investment Property

Connie TangPosted
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

Thank you to everyone who replied. A friend of mine also suggested getting an umbrella insurance, since it's not expensive, so I might just go with that for my first investment property rather than creating an LLC without fully understanding the implications. For example, in MA, you have to pay an annual fee of $500, which is a lot. I heard there were tax benefits with LLCs, but then my friend also said that his accountant told him there aren't really any additional tax benefits with LLCs. So many mixed messages, ahh!

@James Thiel and @Jeff Rogers, someone I know owns multiple investment properties (not sure how many) in MA and they have each one under an LLC. There must be good reason for it. If you have to pay an annual fee (at least this is the case in MA), it better be worthwhile!

Post: LLC for Investment Property

Connie TangPosted
  • Posts 14
  • Votes 5

Hello!

I am a newbie investor, just getting into the game (scared sh*tless).

I need some advice about whether or not to create an LLC for my investment property purchase. I've heard from several people that you should put it in an LLC for personal protection purposes, but also that it offers many tax advantages, but then I've also read online that an LLC has more downsides than benefits if you are a first-time investor, so it is not worthwhile. I am honestly a bit overwhelmed by all of this, so I am seeking any insights that anyone can offer here on BiggerPockets. Secondly, if going with the LLC ends up being the correct path for me, would I register that in my home state or the state the investment property is in (I live in MA and I am shopping in RI).

Thank you!

Congrats @David McMaster! That’s amazing. I can’t wait to get started...just need to find a worthwhile deal. Haven’t seen anything worth investing in so far in my area, but I hope to find something soon.