Originally posted by @Shane H.:
I think the idea that he has no legal rights to demand the tenant be removed is contrary to the idea that he's selling his own property...
I can absolutely demand a tenant be removed prior to closing. I seemed to have missed the comment where he said he can close because he was originally buying for himself. You're right that he doesn't need a license to wholesale. He should close, then he's free to market all he wants. And he's free to make demands of the tenant to allow him to show it.
He can make all the demands he wants to the owner of the property regarding his tenants, but until he owns it himself he cannot give a tenant '10-14' days to vacate. He has no relationship with and no written or oral lease with this woman. All he has is a contract to purchase the property as some point in the future from the owner, who also happens to be the landlord. He is free to make his purchase contingent upon the house being vacant at closing, but there is no scenario where this woman would be subject to eviction by someone who doesn't own the property, have the rights to lease the property out, or has ever had any sort of agreement with her.
Think about if we were to look at it from a different point of view. Does this guy have any obligations to the tenant during the contract period? If the furnace explodes and injures the tenant, is the prospective buyer liable for those damages? No - that problem lies with the owner/landlord/person in charge of the property. You say he's selling his own property, but it's not his property unless he actually closes on it.