Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Sloan Clark

Sloan Clark has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

The clients (who are not married, but live together and are buying the house together) were told they HAVE to do an FHA loan. They wanted a conventional loan, and qualified for a conventional loan from a different lender. But this lender (who is in bed with the realtor) is saying clients can not get a conventional loan, because they are not married.

Could this be legal? I thought ECOA protected people based on marital status?  And the other bank was able to do the conventional loan.

Is it possible that this particular lender can't get PMI/MIP for non-married people? Is that a thing?

Does anyone know a reason why someone would be eligible for FHA, but not conventional due to marital status? If not, what would be motivation for the lender to pressure client into FHA?