Hey Rich and Zach,
Couple red flags on this I wanted to point out. The base EAV (equalized assessed value) for a TIF district is established at the start of a TIF district and the incremental EAV increases from there. The amount of actual revenue is based on that incremental share applied to the actual property tax bill you paid. In this case the Base amount is critical because that changes everything. Also, the age of the District matters as when they expire they cannot reimburse you anymore so knowing how many years are left is key. A district with only 5 years left would kill the 9 year assumption above.
Here is a little example of the math for Base EAV implications.
|
Scenario 1 |
Scenario 2 |
Base EAV |
100,000 |
120,000 |
After-Rehab EAV |
200,000 |
200,000 |
|
|
|
Incremental EAV |
100,000 |
80,000 |
|
|
|
Property Tax Rate |
5% |
5% |
Property Tax Bill |
10,000 |
10,000 |
|
|
|
Base Property Taxes |
5,000 |
6,000 |
Incremental (TIF) Property Taxes |
5,000 |
4,000 |
Second if you are not in a TIF district already as you state, it can be a huge legislative headache on the municipality's part to expand the boundary to include your property. In Illinois for example it requires both local city council actions and studies, but also authorizing legislation from Springfield too. Not sure on the specifics of MA but in my experience it's easier to do a project already in a TIF than to get the boundary changed. At minimum that aspect alone could add a few months, not including the negotiation over a redevelopment agreement and terms.
TIF deals are going to come with a redevelopment agreement that holds you to terms with the City in exchange for the money. In some cases they will only pay you out over time reimbursing you in the following calendar year after the property taxes were paid as a TIF may not have the amount on hand or the City might not be willing to issue a note so that you get the cash up front. Some also have clawbacks for excess profit. The term length is often lasts 10 years and can include restrictions on sale during the term. Perhaps the most dangerous for investors that are not aware is if the City requires Prevailing Wage which can instantly increase your construction costs 30-40%.
If you want a good reference on TIFs from the largest program in the country,
https://www.chicago.gov/content/dam/city/depts/dcd/general/2... from City of Chicago gives a good background to start.
If structured right TIF can be a great tool but just realize that you are signing up for a much longer design/planning phase, and a long-term agreement with the City that is recorded against the property.
In your case, I think Zach is right to recommend an Opportunity Zone if you are in one as an easier incentive type. Good luck on your project.