Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Christopher Cantrall

Christopher Cantrall has started 2 posts and replied 2 times.

I have a stake in a collection of rental properties (78 units, ~$85,000 a unit) and the previous sales in the area have convinced my partners and I that a sale now may be in our best interest.

Now...one partner is highly opposed to brokers/agents/etc.  I'm more of the practical type to just pay a few percent and move on with my life, but hey, it is what it is.

This all makes me curious: To what degree is it feasible at all to sell a decent number of units for a price north of $6 million on our own?  I don't like the idea, but to the extent it's feasible, I can do the work.  But it just feels so unlikely offhand, with an entire ecosystem built around the broker/agent model.

Any ideas?

I'm in the process of purchasing a home with the intent of moving into it in the next 2-3 years.  Before that time I'd like to rent it out.  I have a good bit of experience with rental property generally, but not so much from the specific angle of renting before using as a primary residence.  Price for the rental would probably be in the $2,500 - $3,000 range, depending on how nice we make it.  Which is high for the area for sure.

The home is roughly 40 years old and in very good shape for its age but has a few outstanding immediate issues.  Bedroom carpets are old.  One bathroom has peeling wallpaper (the current owner went to tear it out then gave up).  And one burner is broken on the current cooktop.  Those are the only obvious superficial issues, and any underlying repairs we'd go ahead and make as well.

I'm just not sure how much I want to renovate to my own standard versus for the rental. My wife and I like nice finishes and nice spaces. Almost certainly more than would deliver ROI either from a rental or appreciation, and I'm ok with that. But I don't want to put something in too nice and have it end up damaged after a couple of years. That would be silly. On the flip side I don't want to make a repair that's too cheap just to be cheap knowing I'll replace it later.

For example, I know we're going to want tile in the bedrooms.  Probably porcelain.  It feels like we could probably put this in now as it's a durable surface.  I really don't want to carpet just to rip it out.  I also want radiant heat floors in the bedrooms, so naturally we'd get those in when doing the tile. On the flip side, I figure we can just clean up the existing bathroom and not redo it to our specs until after we want to move in.

The cooktop is trickier.  A burner is broken, which feels like we can't really just leave even though who the heck uses all four burners.  But I would want something overly fancy as I love to cook.  I'd rather not go fancy for the rental on the cooktop, but replacing the cooktop after 2 years is once again silly seeming and wasteful.

All this said, any general thoughts about how to weight improvement decisions in a case where you're intending to move in shortly would be welcome.  It's a new world for me!