Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris Park

Chris Park has started 3 posts and replied 24 times.

Quote from @Rick Albert:
Quote from @Chris Park:
Quote from @Rick Albert:
Quote from @Chris Park:
Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Chris Park:

Whoever gave you that advice was wrong. Every adult residing in your rental should apply, be approved by you, and sign the lease. That's non-negotiable. If you don't screen them, then you don't know what kind of risk they present. You can't hold them accountable to the terms if they aren't on the lease.

I would remove all of them from the rental and start fresh.


 So basically I'm at risk of the tenant damaging my property and not having a way of going after her because she is not signed to the lease.  I did run a light background and employment check, she checks out.  I'll add to the lease I guess?


 You are at risk of a few things:

1. More unnecessary damage. Yes, you have a deposit, but it may not be enough.

2. Higher maintenance cost. Are you paying for utilities? If so, you are paying extra.

3. Squatters. They aren't on the lease and it needs to be clear that they are guest.

I wouldn't add them to the lease, I would want them out. Have a guest policy in place and stick to it. Why add more people and not charge more for it?


 Exactly, your last point about having more people on the lease (more foot traffic, higher utilities, wear & tear etc).  That's what annoys me the most but I'm having a hard time finding someone that doesn't move someone in within 6-12 months of the lease

For next time, it would be legal if I added some language into the lease that said adding a tenant would add $500/month to the lease?


 Why do you have to cave in and allow people to be added? To answer your question about raising rents it depends if it is subject to LA Rent Control or not. 

Just put a guest policy in and enforce it. 


Unfortunately I do have a guest policy and whoever I bring in keeps breaking it.  I've almost given up at this point, maybe I should take it off the market 

thanks for the help

Quote from @Rick Albert:
Quote from @Chris Park:
Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Chris Park:

Whoever gave you that advice was wrong. Every adult residing in your rental should apply, be approved by you, and sign the lease. That's non-negotiable. If you don't screen them, then you don't know what kind of risk they present. You can't hold them accountable to the terms if they aren't on the lease.

I would remove all of them from the rental and start fresh.


 So basically I'm at risk of the tenant damaging my property and not having a way of going after her because she is not signed to the lease.  I did run a light background and employment check, she checks out.  I'll add to the lease I guess?


 You are at risk of a few things:

1. More unnecessary damage. Yes, you have a deposit, but it may not be enough.

2. Higher maintenance cost. Are you paying for utilities? If so, you are paying extra.

3. Squatters. They aren't on the lease and it needs to be clear that they are guest.

I wouldn't add them to the lease, I would want them out. Have a guest policy in place and stick to it. Why add more people and not charge more for it?


 Exactly, your last point about having more people on the lease (more foot traffic, higher utilities, wear & tear etc).  That's what annoys me the most but I'm having a hard time finding someone that doesn't move someone in within 6-12 months of the lease

For next time, it would be legal if I added some language into the lease that said adding a tenant would add $500/month to the lease?

Quote from @Nathan Gesner:
Quote from @Chris Park:

Whoever gave you that advice was wrong. Every adult residing in your rental should apply, be approved by you, and sign the lease. That's non-negotiable. If you don't screen them, then you don't know what kind of risk they present. You can't hold them accountable to the terms if they aren't on the lease.

I would remove all of them from the rental and start fresh.


 So basically I'm at risk of the tenant damaging my property and not having a way of going after her because she is not signed to the lease.  I did run a light background and employment check, she checks out.  I'll add to the lease I guess?

Quote from @Rick Albert:

You are in Los Angeles, whoever told you to lay low is giving you bad advice. The more people staying there full time the harder it would be to evict and more wear and tear. Are utilities included? That is another issue with more people there.

I would speak with the tenant about it. He may not know that his girlfriend is bringing men over.


So the consensus is that I should add the girlfriend to the lease?

Quote from @Mike Dymski:

Get her to apply.

Separately, sounds like your tenant has a bigger problem than you...

Should I kick him out

I’ll try to keep this as short as possible 


I have a pretty good tenant staying at my guest house month to month.  He was not allowed to bring a live in girlfriend without my approval but I read previous topics on this situation and most said to leave it alone or add her to the lease.  I decided to leave it alone

now this girlfriend of his has begun bringing men over when my tenant is at work or away?  Now I find myself in a situation where I have two people in my unit and neither are on my lease.  Am I potentially exposing myself to some sort of issue here?  I’m worried about legal/insurance exposure and also just generally annoyed at all the foot traffic in the u it

Quote from @Colleen F.:

This actually made me check my own LG mini split and it has the capacity for wifi control that I didn't realize. We set it up online. Your brand may also have this capacity.  If you have this capacity the tenant could turn it on before he returns home.  


 glad I could help haha

Quote from @Ned J.:

If you want tenants to think/act/behave the way you do all the time, you are going to have a real hard time being a LL.

I agree with your frustration.....and I agree with your opinion that the tenant shouldn't be doing what he is doing.... but you wont' change the current tenants mindset.

When is the lease up? 


 Not for a while

I’m not trying to control anyone.  It takes 10-15 minutes for the unit to become cool regardless of temp.  If they’ll be out 2-3 hours then that’s fine but there’s no reason for it to be running nonstop 15 hours at a time with nobody inside it 

Quote from @Bruce Woodruff:
Quote from @Chris Park:
Quote from @Ned J.:

Having the remote thermostat installed is easy if you aren't a DIY person...

But what's the legality of having the LL control the temp of the unit? I cant see that as being legal. Ive heard of ones that have password protected settings .... I guess you could set max high and low values but I cant see it being legal to set how much/often its on/off. 

And who the hell wants to have to constantly monitor the unit and shut the AC on/off with the WIFI every time they leave? If its not automatic, I'm not doing it.....


 So the tenant can run the AC for a week straight with nobody inside it and that's not an issue?  Legal or not, it's irresponsible and should be addressed


 Whether it is responsible or irresponsible is not any of your business unfortunately..


First it's the AC and then it's the oven.  Oops forgot to turn it off and now the house is burned down.  

Previous tenant let the toilet flush run 24/7 for 2 months and I got a $1000 bill.  Not my responsibility I guess