Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris F.

Chris F. has started 1 posts and replied 1 times.

Hi all,

I recently purchased a 2 family property, and one of the units was occupied by tenants who have been there around 10 years, and have always paid the rent on time. They were on an annual lease all years prior, but went month to month since their previous lease expired about a month before closing. They pay $2200/mos, but I just found out they only had $600 for a security deposit. When I brought up the idea of raising that to $2200 to match the rent, the tenants said they can't afford that. I think they are just negotiating, but can't know for sure.

They seem like good tenants who are low risk for causing damage, but I'm definitely taking on some level of risk with a low security deposit. I want to put them on an annual lease (and they would prefer that as well), and was thinking of countering with a higher rent to offset the risk I'm taking for the low security deposit. Does that seem reasonable?

I'm curious what approach others recommend.

Thanks!