Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Chris Dee

Chris Dee has started 4 posts and replied 28 times.

Has anyone bought a property that didn't appraise because they though it was higher value than the appraisal?

Thank you Ko,the seller was mad that bank appraisal came in low and ordered another one. The 2nd appraisal was clearly fudged and cannot be take seriously, but seller is using it to defend the contract price. I think if I go with another lender, the appraisal will come in similar or 10k above the 1st one.

Hi Everyone,

In advance, thank you for any insight. I'm currently under contract for a multi-unit that didn't appraise. I'm in analysis paralysis, need peer input! Would you do this deal if you were me???

Location: Midwest, mid-size town with a number big and small companies, hospital, heavy summer tourism. I'm extremely familiar with this area.

Property: 3 unit, all 2 bed/1bath (1 of the 3 units is not allowed as rental due to zoning. It is half below grade and very well finished with 3 egress windows. )

Cost: $300k (contract) (Appraisal by the bank:$282K)

Rent: Long-term rental: If I only rent 2 legal units min rent is $3200, if I rent all 3 units min rent is, $4KMidterm rental possible because of traveling professionals and hospital. Short-term not allowed by city.

Condition: Built in 1930, All units are updated, newer roof, new windows, new foundations, new sewer, new electric/plumbing. I should expect minimal maintenance. 

Renter: B

Because of the appraisal, my lender, seller agent, 2 appraisers are now in a heated email discussion. Seller paid for 2nd independent appraisal, where appraiser massaged valuation into $305K. Bank found lots of issues with that appraisal and won't accept it.  Property didn't appraise because all multi-units comps sold in the area are in terrible condition in need of min $100k update to get them into this century. This property is updated.  I'm in opinion overload. Someone talk some sense into me. Good or bad? 

Thank you,

Chris

Thank you @Steve K. 

So, I called the head of the local Real Estate Association and he confirmed the sellers broker doesn't have procuring cause because I never signed their agency agreement. So, I did go out and find a buyer agent that I like so far. He has put in an offer on the state approved form and requested a signed affidavit that it was presented to the buyer.  Of course, the seller agent didn't tell the truth to the seller and said that I backed out of the pervious agreement. We are negotiating on the price now since the house has sat on the market since my offer without any interest. Will keep you updated how things turn our. I agree with you this was by far the weirdest experience I've had in making offers. I really appreciate everyone's input. 

Quote from @Account Closed:
Quote from @Chris Dee:

Hi All,

I contacted the seller agent for a property I found on Zillow. The selling broker sent a buyer agent to show the property. I assumed this was the way they handle dual agency.  I made an offer and they verbally got it accepted by seller. When it was time to send me the buy sell agreement they tried to sneak in an Exclusive Buyer Agent agreement that commits us to pay them 3% buyer fee for any house in the state  that we buy for 6 months. I was shocked because I repeatedly told them we don't want them as our buyer agents. I said it was fine to be buyer agent on this specific property because we were dealing with a dual agency situation. When I told them we won't pay buyer fee they ignored our emails and never sent docs to sign for the offer that the seller already verbally confirmed.  I was emailing directly with the broker and I know this behavior is broker approved and mandated. So, I know what they did is unethical and they are required to submit all offers.  However, did they break the law? Also, what should I do from this point forward? I know who the sellers are and can contact them directly?

Thank you much,

Christina 


 Hey Christina, I'm an Agent here in Los Angeles

I know a TON of listing agents that refuse to work with buyers period. Which is fair because buyers oftentimes don't like to sign exclusive agreements so agents end up working for free when showing buyers homes etc. This agent is more than likely just making sure that they get paid if they do any work representing a buyer (in this case you). It may feel unfair, but they are well within their right to structure their business that way. 

Truth be told, a verbal offer holds no value. You can't open escrow on a verbal offer alone. And even though the Agent may be "required" to tell the seller about your offer, they are not "required" to represent you and assist you in preparing the required documentation. 

Reporting this to the MLS/Board will be a waste of time. My advice is to literally call any agent that is local to your area and tell them you would like to submit an offer on a property. I'm sure there will be a long line of agents willing to help you get this across the finish line.

If you were local to California, i'd type up your offer for you in seconds lol 

Best of luck! 


Thank you Segun! Hi to LA :) I was local to Cali and will be again in the future. So, will definitely think of you if we will buy anything in the LA area! So, in my area going to listing agent is just fine and they will all work with buyers directly. I am fine to sign an exclusive for this one property and the broker wants 6 months exclusive for the entire state. I sent the offer and got an acceptance from seller through email (not verbal). I don't think I can go to another agent for this specific property because the first buyer agent created a procuring cause. Thank you again for your thoughts!

Quote from @Steve K.:

Sounds like they sent you a standard buyer's agency agreement, required for you to work with the buyer's agent who showed you the property and had their standard language in there. A lot of listing agents, if not most, don't want to work with unrepresented buyers or act as a dual agent which is actually illegal in some states, and high risk in terms of being sued in others (it's hard to avoid having a conflict of interest when already working with the seller). There's already a 3% buyer's agent fee baked into the listing, you can either have the agent who showed you the property represent you, which is probably what you should do at this point since they showed you the property and they could claim "procuring cause" (although they may not have actually established procuring cause technically, but that's a different topic, and they probably think they did). If you only want to work with them on this transaction, ask them to change the language in the BAA to reflect that. Or you can write the offer yourself and send it to the listing agent and ask to be unrepresented. This is how going direct to the listing agent can make things messy. Sometimes it works, other times not so much.   

Thank you Steve! In my state dual agency is legal. I did ask them to change the agreement to just cover this property and they ignored my emails. I did write the offer myself and got it accepted through email by the seller. The problem is that the broker won't let me sign the buy sell agreement without committing to them for 6 months for all properties in my state.
Quote from @Dan DiFilippo:

@Chris Dee

So presuming your state works the way mine does, and I expect it would. I understand this element of agency law is pretty typical.

You can't force him to write an offer for you. He's not obligated. In fact, he *can't* submit an offer for you because you won't sign his agreement.

He showed you the house already. Agents *can* show houses without a signed agreement. But the reason they might not is that it gives them less protection in terms of being able to guarantee themselves any compensation for the work they're doing showing homes. But this agent did show you the home without a written agreement.

Unfortunately for you, an agreement beforehand would have done more to protect *you*. Because now the agent is your procuring cause in the purchase, should you go on to buy that particular house. They'd have a strong claim for compensation.

Something else you should consider here is that it's possible you read the contract incorrectly. Most contracts state something to the effe t of "compensation due to agent shall be_____________" and then they have filled in "3% of final sales price" or whatever their number is. And you read that part of the contract and think that it means you owe that money. If you read through the remainder of the compensation section, however,it says that the agent will first seek that amount from the listing agent or seller. In this case, a number like 3% is what the contract states, you *are* ultimately responsible for it, but won't have to worry about paying it so long as the listing offers a sufficient commission to cover it.


 I never asked for a buyer agent and called the seller agent directly. They sent a teammate and created a procuring cause. I am fine signing an exclusive buyer agreement for that specific house. Even signing this agreement will never protect me as is stated in the "Dual-Agency" doc. The "buyer agent" will not provide any negotiation advice etc etc because they are under the same broker. I get zero value with this buyer agent. Nevertheless, I am fine to sign the agreement for that specific house. When I asked to do that, they started ignoring my emails.  I do understand the 3%, but I don't trust them not to change the commission split come closing time, sticking me with the 3 %. BTW, I wrote my offer and the offer got accepted by the buyer. The broker is refusing to let me sign the buy sell agreement.

Quote from @Kevin Sobilo:

@Chris Dee, I think this is much ado about nothing tbh.

I suspect this is a misunderstanding. It sounds like you are ok if they represent you for this property but not on any future properties. MANY buyers agents are used to using an "Exclusive" Buyer Agency agreement that locks you in for a period of time to that agent. That may be all this agent is familiar with and could even be their office's default policy to use.

However, in my state, we have another contract available a "NON-Exclusive" Buyer Agency contract which basically says if I am the procuring cause of the sale for example I show you the house etc then you are obligated to work through me as your agent. The agent may just not be familiar with using this type of agreement, but this sounds like what you want.

So, speak to them and/or their broker or even the listing agent. I suspect this is just a lack of communication.

Also, ask about the 3%. I suspect that is covered by the seller's commission UNLESS the seller is offering less for example if the seller is only offering 2.5% to the buyer's agent then you would be obligated for the difference of 0.5%. I suspect that is what that's about. 

Talk to them and ask these sorts of questions and I hope it gets sorted out. 


 Thank you Kevin. Ah, you would think this would be a miss-understanding. However, I know it's not. I have worked with a few buyer agents in the area and they always write the exclusive buyer agreement for the specific property in question. Some, I have agreed to work with for a few months and signed an exclusive for that period. So, everyone knows what's up here. I was very clear in multiple emails that I wasn't interested in ongoing relationship, I asked them to replace "All real estate in state XX" with "123 Main st. etc." That is when they started ignoring my emails. They are waiting for a sucker to sign the exclusive without realizing it. 

About the 3%, yes it says that it will be offset by the commission share. However, I don't trust this broker to tell me at closing that "Surprise, there is no commission share for where is our 3%." I need things to be clean and clear.

Quote from @Nathan Brown:

If you're not a licensed agent--I get the sense you're not based on your questions--then you aren't bound by the same code of ethics which prohibit realtors from going around each other directly to the seller. By all means, if you don't want to be represented, then there's a form they can have you sign acknowledging as much. As for ethics, we don't know what the broker's listing agreement says about any requirements to present offers. Sometimes, they don't actually have to present them. In any event, the local MLS board (or whatever it's called in your jurisdiction) will definitely be able to apply appropriate pressure to act swiftly.
Make sure you request in writing the seller's acceptance or denial of said offer. Verbal isn't enough.


 Thank you Nathan! You are correct they clearly structure their agreements to benefit them and there might be clause in the seller agreement that says they won't present all offers. I saw other reviews for the firm that says they try to show properties to "preferred" agents and withhold offers from sellers. So, there is definitely something going on.  Do you know the name of the form that says I don't want to be represented?  BTW, I have all the offer acceptance communication in email. 

Quote from @Edward Dean:

Have you checked that the 'broker' you were speaking with was the highest person up the chain? If it is a big brokerage they may have a manager (single office or team level), then general manager (franchise/regional/several office level), and a broker of record (person with the most responsibility). If it is a major brokerage, you can usually find a directory online of higher-ups to push the problem up to. If not, then yes, start reaching out to whoever runs their MLS. Also, like Russell said, you can hire your own buyer's agent. They may be able to get a quicker response from this seller's agent.

Best of luck with it!

Thank you Edward. Indeed I just contacted the team lead. They are under REMAX so I will look higher up!