Ok so the reality is that nobody really knows what is going to happen to interest rates over the next 5 to 10 year window because there is no crystal ball. And in many ways, this is not the central point of the original post. The question really is not what specific level interests rates will be 5 or 10 years out, but whether or not there is the potential of a new rate environment that will have to be accounted for somewhere down the line and if so, how to protect ourselves.
Other than for short term flippers, it seems to be a relevant question because I don't know what the average hold is for a multi family (say 10+ units) investment but it would be fair to say that many operate in 5 and 10 year windows unless you are looking at a long term hold. Given that, it is a useful discussion to reflect on what steps could be taken to avoid a potential financing problem in 5 years. While I'm not sure that we are looking at the commercial loan explosion that @Mark Whittlesey referenced above, we could at the very least be looking at higher debt servicing costs that will eat up a bigger portion of the available cash flow.
Again, the goal of this post is not to fear monger, but simply to look at rational strategies going forward for new multifamily purchases in a potential new rate environment. While many who bought 5 years ago may have benefitted from the cap rate compression that accompanied these record low interest rates, it seems that it could be a two edged sword as the pendulum swings back the other way. Higher potential interest rates and higher potential cap rates down the road could make some exit strategies (sale/refinance) far more complicated.
@Victor Menasce presented one potential strategy for dealing with this; one of getting all of your investment cash out of the building by adding value and refinancing early, so that you would have little or none of your investment capital at risk down the road. I would like to get more details from you on the actual mechanics of this Victor, as I guess the only question that I have is how to avoid over leveraging, because unless you can get a non recourse loan you will still have some interest rate risk on refinancing.
It seems to me that it really comes down to that old question of how much leverage is good. Obviously, if you pay cash for the building you have zero leverage but are completely protected from the vagrancies of the debt market. You would have the ability to hold on forever, even if the economy and vacancy rates took a hit.
But we all want to use other people's money (OPM) to improve our return on cash invested, especially in the current low rate environment. So where is the balance? Is it possible to have our cake and eat it too?
One potential strategy that I would like to put forward is the idea of banking the net cash flow from the property over the term of the mortgage (say 5 years) to build a cushion that could be used at the time of refinancing to pay down debt, should the interest rate environment turn unfriendly.
So in the example that I used in the spreadsheet in my first post, the net cash after debt servicing over 5 years would total $150,000. This added to the almost $300,000 in principal reduction over the 5 year term of the mortgage would allow me to pay down the existing debt by close to half a million dollars. That would offer some safety from a rise in rates. Obviously if I put more cash down on the original purchase, I would have more net cash flow available to build my war chest, but this would reduce my leverage and return on cash.
So it would seem that it comes down to the old risk/reward thing. As I see it, it's a higher leverage/higher returns versus lower leverage/higher safety scenario.
Does anyone have any other thoughts on strategies to balance risk/return in an uncertain future?