Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 16%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$39 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Cheryl A.

Cheryl A. has started 3 posts and replied 27 times.

Quote from @Evan Polaski:

I have not heard of any, nor have I tried to.   My guess is between the current climate of both loosening the reigns around private offerings, the reduced restrictions on businesses, and the general reduction of agency autonomy, any SEC complaints are falling on deaf ears.

Additionally, the optics of these cases will not warrant adequate political attention to get regulators attention.  First, most syndicators have not raised meaningful capital, at least meaningful in a business world. Second, the investor base is both not broad enough, typically, nor a sympathetic crowd to the average American.  Most are accredited, and even if you are not and in a 506(b) offering, the fact that someone has $25k/$50k, etc to invest is more than most Americans. 


So are you saying when SEC laws/rules are  broken there's really no SEC recourse? That's really bad for investors.  

Has anyone had success filing a SEC fraud complaint against bad acting GPs? If so, what was your experience, what was the context and what was the outcome?

Quote from @Aileen Ciocon:

I am glad I saw your post @Cheryl A. 

@Cheryl A. I am thankful I saw your post. I was looking at an offering by Blake Capital Group which is the Get To Know You Fund. Imagine, 2.35x Equity Multiple, NO FEES of any kind, ALL profits go to you, 4-8% Cash on Cash (CoC), Monthly distributions, 21+% Internal Rate of Return (IRR), 3-5 Year Hold Period, $25,000 minimum investment. Currently there are 3 assets in the portfolio (one of the lead co-sponsors in one of the assets has a good track record) - I don't know about the rest. Anyway, as tempted as I am to invest, I am now more skeptical after reading your post, because it just seems too good to be true? I am an LP in one of their offerings but what keeps me at ease is that the major sponsor is a reputable one.

Hi @Aileen Ciocon, thanks for joining the discussion. Your willingness to share helps make the investment community stronger.

With their “Get To Know You Fund”, outside of the perfectly crafted sales pitch, some additional things for potential LPs to consider:

* what is the underlying GP partnership structure? Do they have a documented partnership agreement they are willing to share?

* are you investing with the primary sponsor or a secondary sponsor? My experience with secondaries, like Blake Capital, has been very painful.

* are you investing directly in the deal, or in a fund of funds? Fund of funds was discussed earlier in this thread.

* are they being completely transparent with their investment resume? I have yet to see a GP admit to past failures, lessons learned, how they are doing things differently now for LPs.

Ask Blake Capital to share their investment resume with you, including when they were operating under the banner of Djuric Family Office.

Also out of curiosity, what is the criteria for earning the “reputable” sponsor tag and what evidence does an LP have access to to fact check it?

Best of luck in your investment journey.

Cheryl

Hi Melissa, sorry hear that, that's so unethical! When Waterford Grove failed I was told the same. I am surprised by the investor call, all we got were emails :)  

Quote from @Barry Minkow:

The link below contains a report submitted to law enforcement on Blake Capital, currently reporting "46% historical IRRs," $1.6 billion in "total capitalization," and 1,867 fully cycled units (https://blakecapitalgroup.com/our-portfolio/). Now compare this claim, made at the exact same time with pages 4-5 of this "55% historical IRR" and where Blake Capital, in a document investors will rely upon, claims to own 33 properties and 6,436 units. Classic usage of accounting language without the scrutiny of audited financial statements--not to mention 9 points of discrepency in a "historical" number.

Here is the link to the report and addendums sent in 2024 to law enforcement.  

https://app.box.com/s/4sedcgxd2eqou5ugizjspk406zbp75aa

I have absolutely personally nothing against Mr. Djurici (also at https://qccapitalgroup.com/team/), or for that matter his two partners Joe Fairless (https://qccapitalgroup.com/team/), and Chris Salerno (https://qccapitalgroup.com/team/), because I was them....  



Thanks for sharing! I was an investor in Canopy Creek. This "current" investment failed and the property was sold in Dec 2023.

Quote from @Francois D.:

There is an active lawsuit against Mr Djuric in Harris County. It seems small-patato. Based on his claim of net-worth above 100M, it is strange that it has reached the lawsuit level.

https://setexasrecord.com/stories/666762037-court-activity-o...


 Thanks for sharing! Where might an investor learn more about the nature of this lawsuit? 

Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Cheryl A.:

Thanks to all who engaged in and offered advice here. I very much appreciate it! I hope the transparency is helpful to investors.

Note: I have received an "Online Defamation" letter from the Blake Capital Group.  




 online defamation for what? I received one once and sent it to my attorney. This person (not Blake capital) was trying to bully me (wrong move). I was thinking - go ahead and sue, when discovery comes into play and they have to testify under oath (for example were they raising money properly and how were they managing money) - many will not want to answer that question while on the stand. 

Their assertion:

Which is false based on this email sent to investors (note: redacted to protect privacy.)

Thanks to all who engaged in and offered advice here. I very much appreciate it! I hope the transparency is helpful to investors.

Note: I have received an "Online Defamation" letter from the Blake Capital Group.  

Yeah, the operating agreements do not distinguish between GP created docs vs legal filed docs. I'm surprised there's not more legal guard rails in place for these types of deals given the large amount of $$ involved.

Curious when a non accredited investor is let into an investment that states it's open to accredited investors only, how does that make sense? 

What legal filed docs are LPs entitled to see to help validate a deal's failure? To date all I've received is email communications from the sponsors stating the deal failed. I'd really like to see something legal in nature that supports the deal failure, however I'm not sure exactly what to ask for. 

Are LPs entitled to see foreclosure, bank loan related docs? What else?