Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Cheryl A.

Cheryl A. has started 3 posts and replied 24 times.

Hi Melissa, sorry hear that, that's so unethical! When Waterford Grove failed I was told the same. I am surprised by the investor call, all we got were emails :)  

Quote from @Barry Minkow:

The link below contains a report submitted to law enforcement on Blake Capital, currently reporting "46% historical IRRs," $1.6 billion in "total capitalization," and 1,867 fully cycled units (https://blakecapitalgroup.com/our-portfolio/). Now compare this claim, made at the exact same time with pages 4-5 of this "55% historical IRR" and where Blake Capital, in a document investors will rely upon, claims to own 33 properties and 6,436 units. Classic usage of accounting language without the scrutiny of audited financial statements--not to mention 9 points of discrepency in a "historical" number.

Here is the link to the report and addendums sent in 2024 to law enforcement.  

https://app.box.com/s/4sedcgxd2eqou5ugizjspk406zbp75aa

I have absolutely personally nothing against Mr. Djurici (also at https://qccapitalgroup.com/team/), or for that matter his two partners Joe Fairless (https://qccapitalgroup.com/team/), and Chris Salerno (https://qccapitalgroup.com/team/), because I was them....  



Thanks for sharing! I was an investor in Canopy Creek. This "current" investment failed and the property was sold in Dec 2023.

Quote from @Francois D.:

There is an active lawsuit against Mr Djuric in Harris County. It seems small-patato. Based on his claim of net-worth above 100M, it is strange that it has reached the lawsuit level.

https://setexasrecord.com/stories/666762037-court-activity-o...


 Thanks for sharing! Where might an investor learn more about the nature of this lawsuit? 

Quote from @Chris Seveney:
Quote from @Cheryl A.:

Thanks to all who engaged in and offered advice here. I very much appreciate it! I hope the transparency is helpful to investors.

Note: I have received an "Online Defamation" letter from the Blake Capital Group.  




 online defamation for what? I received one once and sent it to my attorney. This person (not Blake capital) was trying to bully me (wrong move). I was thinking - go ahead and sue, when discovery comes into play and they have to testify under oath (for example were they raising money properly and how were they managing money) - many will not want to answer that question while on the stand. 

Their assertion:

Which is false based on this email sent to investors (note: redacted to protect privacy.)

Thanks to all who engaged in and offered advice here. I very much appreciate it! I hope the transparency is helpful to investors.

Note: I have received an "Online Defamation" letter from the Blake Capital Group.  

Yeah, the operating agreements do not distinguish between GP created docs vs legal filed docs. I'm surprised there's not more legal guard rails in place for these types of deals given the large amount of $$ involved.

Curious when a non accredited investor is let into an investment that states it's open to accredited investors only, how does that make sense? 

What legal filed docs are LPs entitled to see to help validate a deal's failure? To date all I've received is email communications from the sponsors stating the deal failed. I'd really like to see something legal in nature that supports the deal failure, however I'm not sure exactly what to ask for. 

Are LPs entitled to see foreclosure, bank loan related docs? What else?

Quote from @Buo Z.:

I invested in one of their projects and it seems to be failing. I've emailed them multiple times now and they have not responded at all to me about what is going on or if my investment is completely wiped out.


Sorry that's frustrating. Not sure if this helps, but here's my failed investment. 

Waterford, Houston, TX - Sponsors: Community Investment Properties, Legacy Wealth Holdings, Djuric Family Office - the claim is this is the first of their deals to lose investor money. I would love to be able to fact check this.

Park North (aka Life Spring Estates), Houston, TX - Sponsors: Inman Equity, Djuric Family Office.

Best of luck, Cheryl 

Post: Syndicator Threatens LPs for Negative Comment about them On BP

Cheryl A. Posted
  • Investor
  • UT
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Don Konipol:
Quote from @Cheryl A.:
Quote from @Duke Giordano:

The nature of the limited partner and syndicator relationship is at best "holding information back" and at worst "deceptive or untruthful".  This dynamic needs to change and hopefully difficult times like we are currently in will force limited partners to demands more transparency.  Some of us in the industry are fighting to help with that for the limited partner, and hopefully that comes to fruition in the near future.  

Agree, that is my why! My greatest pain point is not that the deals failed, although that certainly adds salt to the wounds, it's the poor communication, false narratives, chasing (almost begging) for updates, lack of full disclosure, the smoke and mirrors, etc. These are areas GPs can control and I guess choosing not to. 

Also interesting in my situation when the deals began to fail the gps started distancing themselves from each other, which leads me to think the gps really had no or limited experience managing deals together. Lots of pointing fingers when things fall apart.

Question: during this 3 year run two of the gps have spun up and are now operating under new investment entities. Thoughts on why this might be? Is this a common trend? 

On the flip side of all of this, I'm in a few deals where the GPs have been very good, complete opposite experience. Having a safe forum for LPs the share their experiences is needed.

Cheryl 




In EVERY business there are two kinds of market participants; the people/companies in it for the long haul, through both good and not so good economic times, consisting of EXPERIENCED, PROFESSIONALS whose careers are dedicated to and dependent on fulfilling the needs of their clients/customers.
The other type of participant are in the particular business because it’s OPPORTUNISTIC for them to be in it AT THE TIME.  This year they’re real estate syndicators; three years hence they’re running and selling oil drilling participations, after that they’re involved in fin tech.  

A friend of mine used to do that. At various times during the past 25 years he “specialized” in oil and gas drilling, franchise sales, surgical center investments, office centers, start up incubators, vitamins, mobile washing equipment, cemetery syndications, residential mortgage brokerage, commercial mortgage brokerage, insurance as an investment, long term care insurance, and property development in Mexico.  

Investors need to do a thorough background check on the key INDIVIDUALS that they would be relying on to invest and manage their money.  Every “resume” is going to be biased to make the individual look better than they are, but a hard reading and further research should uncover some hard facts.

To include some humor, here are some “facts” I’ve seen provided on syndicators websites, and what I think the reality is

1. “Attended” university of Pennsylvania …………… signed up for a free introductory day and never came back
2. Management team has over 20 years experience……..no one has been in any business for more than 2 years
3. Uses big data to identify properties ……….has a subscription to Loopnet
4. No one has ever lost a dollar…………we use new investor money to make up loses of old investors
5. We are with you every step of the way……..until your check clears

please do a thorough vetting of any investment you make, at least if it is a size where a loss will cause you concern.  

 Sigh - the first failed deal was stamped with #4  :-/

Post: Syndicator Threatens LPs for Negative Comment about them On BP

Cheryl A. Posted
  • Investor
  • UT
  • Posts 25
  • Votes 11
Quote from @Duke Giordano:

The nature of the limited partner and syndicator relationship is at best "holding information back" and at worst "deceptive or untruthful".  This dynamic needs to change and hopefully difficult times like we are currently in will force limited partners to demands more transparency.  Some of us in the industry are fighting to help with that for the limited partner, and hopefully that comes to fruition in the near future.  

Agree, that is my why! My greatest pain point is not that the deals failed, although that certainly adds salt to the wounds, it's the poor communication, false narratives, chasing (almost begging) for updates, lack of full disclosure, the smoke and mirrors, etc. These are areas GPs can control and I guess choosing not to. 

Also interesting in my situation when the deals began to fail the gps started distancing themselves from each other, which leads me to think the gps really had no or limited experience managing deals together. Lots of pointing fingers when things fall apart.

Question: during this 3 year run two of the gps have spun up and are now operating under new investment entities. Thoughts on why this might be? Is this a common trend? 

On the flip side of all of this, I'm in a few deals where the GPs have been very good, complete opposite experience. Having a safe forum for LPs the share their experiences is needed.

Cheryl