All Forum Posts by: Charit P.

Thanks everyone for you comments. I don’t think it’s depreciation recapture that accounts for the difference. Let me share the actual numbers to illustrate the situation better.

Initial investment in 2020 = $50,000

Cashflow + sale proceeds in 2022 = $40,465 ($90,465 including returned capital)

Following were the reported losses/gains on Form 8582 (captured from my CPA’s worksheets). These numbers are just for this asset, and not offset with other investment losses or gains.

2020: $22,600 (loss)

2021: $4,500 (loss)

2022: $131,013 (gain)

Aggregate = $103,913

Hoping someone with syndication and tax knowledge can answer my question. My first LP multi-family syndication deal sold for a profit in 2022. When I sum up the tax losses claimed during the first 2 years of the deal and the gains reported on my 2022 taxes (all from form 8582), the total is much larger than the actual cashflow + sale profits. My expectations were that the depreciation and other tax losses and gains should offset each other and at the end of the day the gains reported for taxes should equate the tangible gains that I received. This is not the case. Since this is my first syndication sale, I have no other frame of reference.

I have a theory though …….. My CPA says that the profits and losses reported on the K1 are based on ownership share. When I look at the syndication’s PPM it seems the LPs own 100% of the venture with GPs owning none (some of my other syndications assign 70% ownership to LPs and 30% to GPs, matching the profit-sharing ratio). Is it possible that since GPs don’t have an ownership share, their 30% of the profit share is being reported as passed-through gains to the LPs? This would explain why my share of “theoretical” gains is larger than the actual cash received. Anyone else been in the same situation or know if it is possible that a syndication can be structured in such a way that the LPs bear all the tax burden?

@Jeffrey Donis, I'm open to the Southeast, but from conversations that I've had with sponsors who operate in those markets, the cashflow doesn't seem all that great. I'm not particular on geographies, just the cashflow aspect. 

Thanks all for your suggestions. I've now got lots of leads to follow up. 

Thanks @Alan Johnson, @Justin Goodin, @Spencer Gray and @Andrew Schutsky for your suggestions and leads. I've already started contacting and connecting.