Originally posted by @Ali Boone:
Chang, sorry not sure what gave you that impression. If you look at my blog articles here on BP, you'll know that I'm the biggest advocate ever of not just going off the written numbers on a property. I'm huge on the factors that contribute to a property outside of the numbers- market factors, property factors, you name it.
Sorry, I must have said something in my previous response that caused you guys to think I only care about numbers and nothing else. I definitely didn't mean to insinuate that because I'm the farthest from that.
I am just trying to say that its ALWAYS better to consider both variables.
I see you are a huge advocate of cashflow. Nothing is wrong. However, it doesn't cost any if you do also consider appreciation value. I think Bob was trying to tell you that fact. He was trying to say you should also consider people who just want to buy properties for residential use or other investors who purchase based on appreciation.
For example, if there is a condo that has -1% negative cash flow but 10% appreciation value, its better than having a condo that has 1% cash flow but 5% appreciation value.
I probably know what you are trying to say, and you do care about numbers. Its really hard to explain in English since its not my first spoken language, but I believe you undestand what I am trying to say.