Originally posted by @Ryan Potuck:
Hey Nicholas!
I bought my first duplex in July of this year, south of downtown Wilkes Barre. I agree with your analysis. From what my market research has shown, Wilkes Barre has more businesses coming into the area than Scranton (I could be wrong so please tell me otherwise). Due to this I feel like the long term view of Wilkes Barre will gain traction and houses will appreciate, similar to how Scranton houses are priced. Do you or anyone else agree with this statement? I've met a lot of investors who are investing in Scranton but not Wilkes Barre. I think Wilkes Barre is that hidden gem, lagging behind but going to pop up one of these years. Being new to investing I could be overseeing a crucial fact, so please correct me if I'm missing something.
Overall I see the main cities, Wilkes Barre and Scranton, being the hot spots for new business and ultimately appreciation on investments for the NEPA area. I'm looking for feedback on my views as well.
I am so glad you said that! @Ryan Potuck because I feel the same way about Luzerne County. It is A gem, and with a considerably larger population than Lackawanna county. We have a lot going for us, the industrial estate jobs just keep growing and hospital and hospitality is booming.
personally for me as an investor I dont much like investing in the city of Wilkes Barre itself. Not that there isn't great return, however I feel that a lot of locals prefer to live in the towns outside of Wilkes Barre. but overall the immediate area has loads of potential. I like Hanover Township, Kingston, back mountain or mountain top areas. a few others too.
The potential is just waiting to pop, there's also plenty of amusement and lots of big investments coming into the county. in my years studying the area I can tell we we have seen growth in the past 3 years that hasn't been seen in the past 20!
lets connect! Trying to get another meet up put together maybe for late September with a few guys who invest in the county.