I was about to ask a similar question on the newby forum. :)
I backed out of a short-sale deal a couple of weeks ago because I paid to get the home inspected and they found about 15K of repairs that needed to be done that the seller 'failed to mention'. Something was up. On the disclosure the sellers said that the heat and a/c were working.
It wasn't true. Neither could even be turned on and had to be fully replaced. Several other problems too. In the end, the repairs added up and made the offer one where I couldn't get my money back out of it.
This week I looked at a home from a local wholesaler.
They have an inventory of homes they sale and many are not occupied. There was no power etc.. on the home when I walked through it.
They're asking if I want to make an offer. And at face value, it looks like a pretty good deal. I haven't completely finished crunching the numbers. But at first glance, I think it is going to be profitable.
But the problem is I really don't know because I can't inspect the home. They don't really have any disclosure info on the house either. And certainly no 'repair estimate' was mentioned (And I didn't know to ask. Do now though. ) I'm not sure if they own it or how the deal works on their side, but they seem unable to get the power etc... turned on so I can inspect it and just want me to make an offer.
From what I've read on this thread, it looks like this is normal? Not sure. But after what I went through on my last home, it seems pretty risky to buy a home without it being inspected.
These guys have a lot of homes and if all goes well they could end up being a good source for the future but I don't want to ask for an unusual concession if there are a ton of other experienced buyers who will walk through the home and just make an offer.
Is it totally unacceptable be ask to be allowed to inspect it? What's the standard operation procedure here? :)