Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Benjamin Summers

Benjamin Summers has started 1 posts and replied 4 times.

Post: An Introduction to Option Strategies in Real Estate

Benjamin SummersPosted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 0

Of course I've considered counterparty risk; it is one of several key variables for the parties to consider in valuing the option... a process that will inevitably evolve over time as the market develops and matures. I am by no means suggesting that real estate options can trade with the fluidity of marketable securities; the friction of real estate transactions alone precludes that from occurring. I am advocating, however, that there is great opportunity for them to be utilized in the real estate space, especially as a means to create counterparties for those who aren't eternally optimistic about the market and to bridge market-stalling bid-ask spreads with the physical asset, which would improve overall liquidity in the market.

Your comments highlight the biggest frustration I experience as an alternative asset manager with one foot in finance and the other in real estate: both cultures have a dogmatically limited view on how things are done, which precludes each from dealing with the other in the ways required to pull real estate out of the dark ages.

The first step is to educate real estate market participants on finance in general: how to qualify and quantify risk, the mechanics of options, etc. Then allow the creativity of the market participants to employ them appropriately, allowing the market to evolve with the underwriting standards that best meet the applications of these tools. What I don't want to see in real estate is a top-down approach like we have in finance where market participants are grossly limited by misguided regulation into fear-based decision making. The only regulation we need is the proper enforcement of fraud law.

Post: An Introduction to Option Strategies in Real Estate

Benjamin SummersPosted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Brian Moore:

@Benjamin Summers

(Sorry, technical difficulties on prior post...)

Your information on derivatives is good but other than the call option (known simply as an "option" in real estate parlance) I'm not sure how puts or straddles can be applied to real estate investment.

The problem with real estate versus the US financial markets (where these financial derivatives were "derived") is that, unlike publicly traded companies, public information on real estate is imperfect, so bad in fact, that for a commercial deal to transact it takes 30-60 days of due diligence by the buyer.

The only way for these derivatives to have any type of reasonable liquidity is to have professionals perform standardized due diligence and publicly share the information to all parties. Most owners don't want to have their building picked apart by a professional appraiser, building inspector, pest inspector, environmental inspector, etc- because it can hurt their potential market value. (They would rather take their chances with a buyer that is less detail-oriented). Plus, who would pay for that cost - which could easily run several $000's?!

Thinking through this a little further, there MAY be someone willing to pay for these costs in order to get financing - a sponsor that raises funds through crowdfunding. Many crowdfunding portals already perform a portion of this due diligence when they list an offering. For a few thousand dollars more, they could do a fairly complete job of the due diligence and create a standardized report on the asset. With this report a reasonable market participant could estimate the underlying value of the property. Then, the crowdfunding portal could offer an exchange for a) the underlying crowdfunded asset (debt or equity share), and b) derivatives tied to these asset values.

One issue with these derivatives is that the duration of the crowdfunded asset (debt or equity share) has a limited and unknown lifespan. Derivatives that expire after the entity dissolves and the crowdfunded asset has been settled will have no value. This uncertainty would ensure very few market participants.

Another issue with a derivatives market is the information asymmetry between the sponsor and the investors. Not only does the sponsor have substantial inside information on changes to the asset value, but the sponsor has full control over the asset and can sell it, refinance it or otherwise manipulate its value. Why does that matter since the sponsor has a financial interest in the success of the project won't he/she make the best decisions to increase the return to investors? With derivatives, especially options, a sponsor (or his/her surrogate) could make more money trading in the secondary market than the sponsor could make on the original fees/carried interest from the deal. Thus the issue of insider trading becomes something that may have to be regulated just like in the public markets. 

...and that's exactly my point: the lack of professional due diligence and regulatory burden in real estate are what create the opportunity. Just like the parties to the trade of physical real estate are responsible for their own valuations, the same holds true for real estate derivatives. As you noted, call options already have a fairly well established trade... there is no reason that cannot be extended to puts, straddles, etc. I think you are confusing the regulatory liability of a FINRA licensed broker-dealer with the free market's price discovery mechanism. Realtor associations have already established that equitable interests (i.e. options) can be listed on the MLS, so the "exchange" is already in play. Real estate derivatives are only limited in trade by the expertise of Realtors who hold an effective monopoly on the asset class's brokered market.

Post: An Introduction to Option Strategies in Real Estate

Benjamin SummersPosted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Utiba Max Deazle:

Hello Benjamin. I happened upon your post. Not an expert by any means on the topic of Options, much less its application in real estate but I find it very Interesting. I like it! Though I understand the basic concept of the Call and Put derivative, help me on a few things.

1. Who are the Market Maker makers?

2. One a given day how do I know the value of the underlying asset? In this case a house.

Look forward to understanding more on the topic. 

First, there are no market makers in real estate or real estate derivatives, which is why they are not freely traded (i.e. illiquid). Market makers in general are highly liquid investors (i.e. investment banks and large brokerages) who will buy or sell a given type of asset at any time (during trading hours). They profit from the bid-ask spread (think about exchanging currency in an airport) and from the aggregate of investor behavior with respect to market cycles (when a market is at its peak investors tends to buy; when a market is at its low investors tends to sell). Market makers are not necessary, however, to facilitate trades. Real estate brokerages could simply list and sell real estate options just like they do brick and mortar buildings.

Secondly, the value of the underlying asset for a real estate derivative is simply the real estate itself. Real estate values can be calculated by evaluating comparable sales, income or (far less accurately) cost to construct. We highly prefer to look at residential real estate's net operating income as the primary, if not sole, metric of value. The value of a real estate derivative, such as a call option, is approximately equal to the value of the underlying minus the cost of the option itself; the value also takes into account the term of the option, ability of the parties to perform, etc.

Post: An Introduction to Option Strategies in Real Estate

Benjamin SummersPosted
  • Investor
  • Miami, FL
  • Posts 6
  • Votes 0

One of most prolific and powerful tools of “creative” finance in real estate is the lease-option, but this tool represents only the proverbial tip of the iceberg when it comes to the most powerful breed of derivatives in the investing world, options. There are two basic types of options: the call option (or “call”) and the put option (or “put”). A call is what is utilized in the traditional lease-option; the put, on the other hand, is virtually unheard of in the world or real estate. An option, call or put, can be used as a standalone contract or in various combinations simultaneously to bet on any potential outcome. In other words, option strategies can be structured to profit from a property rising in value, falling in value, not changing in value, or simply by its value just moving… up or down. While options strategies are considered basic knowledge for financial professionals, they are hardly understood by real estate investors and agents, and herein lies the opportunity. In an effort to help expand their market within the real estate investing community (which will improve its overall liquidity), this article will attempt to briefly explain what options are and impart a basic understanding how they can be utilized:

Derivative

In simple terms, a derivative is any contract that derives its value from the asset that it’s written on, or underlying asset. Futures/forwards contracts, options and swaps are the most common types of derivatives. One simple example of a derivative is a purchase contract on a house, which would be referred to as a futures or forward contract in the world of finance. If a house has a current market value of $500k and the purchase contract has a sale price of $450k, then the purchase contract has a potential value of $50k. Of course there are many considerations that affect the value of the purchase contract such as the method/accuracy of estimated market value of the underlying house, term (time left to close), and perceived strength of the buyer; but regardless, both in theory and in practice, the assignable real estate purchase contract is a derivative that can be sold (i.e. assigned) in the open market to another party for a fee.

Call Option

A call option is an agreement in which an investor pays someone else, a counterparty, for the right, but not the obligation, to buy something (i.e. underlying asset) at a specified price within a specific time period, or term. This payment is called an option fee, consideration or premium. It may help to remember that a call option gives an investor the right to “call in” (buy) an asset. Investors profit on a call when the underlying asset increases in price. A call option is said to be in the money when the purchase price of the underlying asset, or strike price, is below the market price of the underlying asset (plus the option fee if it is not credited to the strike price); the call is out of the money when its strike price is above the market value (again, plus the option fee if it is not credited to the strike price). In the case of the lease-option (which is two separate agreements: a lease and a call) investors are generally banking on either the underlying property appreciating during the term of the option or they believe they have negotiated a strike price that is below current market value with no expectation of the property falling in value, or depreciating, during the option term. It’s worth noting that the lease is not necessary to benefit from the value of the option.

Put Option

A put option is the opposite of a call where the owner of an underlying asset pays an option fee to a counterparty for the right, but not the obligation, to sell the asset at a specified price within a specified time. A put option is said to be in the money when the strike price is above the market price of the underlying asset (minus the option fee if it is not credited to the strike price), and out of the money when its strike price is below the market price (again, minus the option fee if it is not credited to the strike price). A put becomes valuable as the price of the underlying asset falls, or depreciates, relative to the strike price. For example, if an investor buys a put option on a property for $500k with a term of two years, he has the right to sell is house for $500k at any time during that two-year period to the counterparty of his put. An investor might do this is he thinks the market might crash during the put option term or if he believes he overpaid for the property. Put options can act as a form of insurance against a depreciating asset or crashing market.

Long and Short Option Positions

For each of these two types of options, an investor can take either side of the contract, the long or the short position: In the case of call options, a long position is the right to buy (call) the underlying asset. For the long call holder, the payoff is positive if the asset’s price exceeds the strike price by more than the premium paid for the call. Short call holders believe an asset’s price will decrease; they are said to sell or write a call. If an investor sells a call, holding a short position, he gives up the control to the buyer of the call (the long call) who determines whether the option will be exercised. For the writer of the call, the payoff is equal to the premium received from the buyer of the call if the asset’s price declines, but if the asset rises more than the strike price plus the premium, then the writer will lose money.

Like a short call position, long put holders believe an asset’s price will decrease and buy the right (long) to sell (put) the underlying asset. As the long put holder, the payoff is positive if the asset’s price is below the strike price by more than the premium paid for the put. Short put holders believe the asset’s price will increase and sell or write a put. For the writer of the put, the payoff is equal to the premium received by the buyer of the put if the asset price rises, but if the asset price falls below the strike price minus the premium, then the writer will lose money.

The Straddle and Other Simultaneous Options

While options can be used to generate returns based on an expectation that an asset’s price will move in a particular direction, they can also be used to generate returns based upon an expectation of whether an asset’s price will simply move at all, i.e. experience volatility. A straddle is an investment strategy involving the purchase or sale of a put and call option at the same time on a single asset with the same strike price and term; this allows the holder to profit based on how much the price of the underlying security moves, regardless of the direction of price movement. The purchase of the call-put pair is known as a long straddle and profits are made from significant price movement up or down insofar as the price of the underlying asset increases or decreases more than the amount of the option fees paid. The sale of the put-call pair is known as a short straddle and profits are made from stagnant pricing as the owner of the short straddle collects option fees for both the put and the call when neither will be exercised. It is worth noting that options can be used in many various combinations and to accomplish any number of hedging strategies.

Options and Real Estate

Option strategies represent a relatively inexpensive, low-risk approach to betting on any possible outcome an asset may experience; all that is needed is another party with the conviction to put their money up in support of the opposing view. Real estate brokers are perfectly positioned to match such counterparties and to establish real estate derivatives as a liquid investment market.

The unique advantage of real estate as compared to traditional financial assets is that hardly anyone in the residential market has any idea how to price and value options. It is common practice for real estate owners to charge disproportionately small option fees for the right to buy their property at a given price (especially when a call is paired with a lease), which affords real estate investors the unique opportunity to recognize substantial upside potential while incurring hardly any risk. This disproportionate, or asymmetric, risk-reward profile (i.e. convexity) is the ultimate goal for professional investors.