Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Bruce G.

Bruce G. has started 2 posts and replied 3 times.

Post: Isn't this one huge advantage to Multi_Family investing?

Bruce G.Posted
  • Investor
  • Wilmington, DE
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 3
Originally posted by @Jack B.:

Let's say I buy a 50 unit apartment complex. My mortgage is fixed. Expenses such as taxes and insurance will likely rise slowly over time.

Now if I raise the rent $50 per year on all 50 units (perfect scenario to demonstrate the concept) I'm pulling in an extra 30K per year. Now let's say I do that each year for six years. Now I'm making 180K a year MORE than before.

In this scenario, expenses have been budgeted for from the normal rent base, however, I could dip into some of this cash flow if needed.

I'm curious, if this is really true, why are more people NOT doing this? Seems to me THIS is the way to go. Heck I could replace my six figure IT salary in a few years and retire living the same lifestyle I live NOW. And I just get richer over time as rents rise and the mortgage is paid down.

@Jack B 

I understand what your saying, but your forgetting important factors. Increasing the rents gradually but with no added value in your 50 unit building will create turnover (over-time). You also have to consider in the perfect scenario the demographics and what type of tenants your catering towards, is your property in a desirable location? Is that location apart of a bigger redevelopment effort from the city/town or will be? If so then you can project an outlook of rental increase from say not just $50, but $50-$200 per unit annually as development brings in new demographics, this will also allow you to "update" building or buildings with your surroundings (new development) which will justify the increase in rents.

Smart investors don't just increase rents to do it because they can, there's a reason, which is done both from a artistic perspective (your vision) and a science perspective (hard data).

This may or may not answer your question as to why you don't see this as common practice. But there are property owners who play your provided scenario in real life, and I can't say I've seen them stick with that strategy for a long time without seeing the drawbacks of arbitrarily raising rents.

One of the many things to consider when you plot out scenarios. :-).

Bruce

Post: Recommendations?

Bruce G.Posted
  • Investor
  • Wilmington, DE
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 3

All,

Can anyone assist or refer someone whom I can speak with that I can speak with about off-market commercial property in D.C.?

Thank you,

Bruce

Post: D.C. Referrals?

Bruce G.Posted
  • Investor
  • Wilmington, DE
  • Posts 4
  • Votes 3

All,

Can anyone recommend or refer someone whom I can speak with that can assist with off-market commercial property in D.C.?

Thank you,

Bruce