Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brock W.

Brock W. has started 1 posts and replied 6 times.

@Mike Dymski

Interesting. In my case I bought for 250k, converted to rental at 300k and did a cash out refi to capture anything above the 20% required to avoid PMI.

What your saying is that I'll now have to pay taxes on that 50k appreciation in addition to any other gains when/if I sell?

@Mike Dymski

I'm confused, and you'll have to excuse my ignorance as I am a rookie. But what would that get me?

If I sold that property, took the gains tax free, then turned around and put the same amount down on an identical property. Nothing has changed.

That initial down payment money (60k for both scenarios) would still be subject to the same taxes? Correct?

@Eddie L.

Because of the COVID market I could probably sell it today for around 50-75k more now than i could 2 years ago. Give or take. Those would be tax free gains up until Sept 1, 2022. Then I take a hit for taxes if I sell.

However my renter wants to stay, so I'm inclined to let him sign another 2 year lease and just keep on keepin on.

Just an update on this after almost 2 years.  I did end up renting my previous residence.  I was able to do a cash out refi to keep 20% down (60k) and took the rest and paid off my wife's vehicle.  I'm cash flowing nearly $500 a month from that property and living in a newer house not far from the rental.  I've had the same renter in there for almost 2 years and he has just informed me that he will be looking to sign a new lease to remain there for at least another year if not another 2.

So far, this has been a success in my eyes and I have no regrets.  Now it's time for me to start looking at leveraging the equity that the rental property has accrued and leveraging that towards a second property!  At least that's my thinking.  This all fairly new to me!

Originally posted by @Aaron K.:

1031 Exchanges are a thing so you don't always get taxed on gains.  The big thing with current home vs new home is the returns.  I would say most of the time a primary residence doesn't offer great returns as a rental because it wasn't bought for that reason.  Yes there are exceptions sometimes you get lucky or you have a CA prop 13 type situation where property taxes are locked in at the lower assessed value but the main debate isn't around taxes.  Unless you pull the cash out for non RE investment purposes a 1031 is usually the ticket.

Right, forgot to mention 1031 exchanges.  That gain has to be used towards the new property.... is there a time frame on that?  I thought I heard 6 months somewhere?


But again, back to my original inquiry... it really seems like a wash.  If I am confident I can rent my current property and all i have to do is buy a new one to live in... that saves me the headache of trying to sell without a realtor, having to pay closing costs for a new rental, and buying a house to live in all at once.

First time poster.  I've done some reading and searching through the forums but haven't really found the answer I'm looking for (i'm sure it there I just can't find it).I know this is common inquiry but like I said I'm not seeing my question answered. 

I'm considering renting my existing primary home for $1900-2000 per month which would cash flow around $700 per month.  Doing this would mean that I take some money from savings as a down payment from for a new primary home for my family of 4.

I've seen the common discussions about gain exclusion once I've rented out that property beyond three years.  

My question is, what's really the difference?

If I sell my current home and walk away with $90-100k(not getting a realtor involved) and turn around and take that money and buy a different property (or two) then I'm right back in the same boat in terms of taxes. What have I really saved?  Additionally,  I'll begin a depreciation schedule from day 1 of renting those new properties with no opportunity to sell before 3 years and get tax free gains. I'd also be required to pay that recapture when I sell the new properties just like I would if I sold my existing home after renting it out for 3+ years.

The only advantage I see is that IF I am able to sell without a realtor at a price that is amicable to me (90k in gain), then I could turn around and put that down on a twinhome and rent each side (my market dictates to me that the rent would be anywhere from $1400-1500 per side).  That payment would run around $2k per month so I'd cash flow a little more than my current home would, but I'd be paying twice the closing costs, etc.  That 90k would still be subject to taxes when/if I ever sold that property.

Can someone straighten me out here?  Am I missing something?