Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Brian C.

Brian C. has started 15 posts and replied 67 times.

Post: Replace Concrete Patio

Brian C.Posted
  • STAFFORD, VA
  • Posts 78
  • Votes 39
Originally posted by @Bruce Woodruff:

Best way - Jackhammer it out and replace it, this time with adequate rebar and high pressure concrete.....

Cheaper way - fill the cracks and paint it with deck paint

Compromise - Lay tile on top (if you feel it's done moving) 

It's pretty uneven and separating.  You think I could edge it with timbers or something, lay sand over it, even it out and go over with pavers, assuming it's done moving. 

Post: Replace Concrete Patio

Brian C.Posted
  • STAFFORD, VA
  • Posts 78
  • Votes 39

What do you think is the best way to replace this patio?  It's in pretty bad shape, cracked in half sinking in opposite directions. 

Just looking for the most cost effective.

Post: Pre-foreclosures in Virginia?

Brian C.Posted
  • STAFFORD, VA
  • Posts 78
  • Votes 39
Originally posted by @Aj Parikh:

Hi @Brian C. I am late to this thread but I wanted to know if you ended up pursuing pre-foreclosures in VA. I am trying to find off market deals as well so I was wondering if you had any luck.

No, I never did. I did end up finding a couple REO's and I got a short sale, but they were all on the MLS. I haven't been able to find a good deal that way though for well over a year now. Lately I've just been finding decent deals on the MLS, buying at, or close to, market value.

Post: Looking for a Virginia Tax Professional

Brian C.Posted
  • STAFFORD, VA
  • Posts 78
  • Votes 39

Thanks everyone for your feedback!  I ended up with a lot of good recommendations.

Post: Looking for a Virginia Tax Professional

Brian C.Posted
  • STAFFORD, VA
  • Posts 78
  • Votes 39

I'm looking for a Tax professional for 2020 taxes and going forward, who is familiar with the following:

Rental Income

Backdoor Roth

1031 Exchange 

If you'd like more information,  please let me know.


Thanks!

Originally  posted by @Colin Reid:
Originally posted by @Brian C.:
Originally posted by @Todd Pultz:

@Brian C. Your statement was that almost every investment will be negative cash flow in the first year! Completely inaccurate, but you said that because it helps you feel better about your deal. And your last post said it was fair to assume most real estate deals don’t recoup their money in the first year. Again, inaccurate. Quit using broad statements. We have closed a dozen multi-family deals this year and all were 0 cash in and all refinanced in 6-8 months pulling cash out.

Your a brick wall man and you got it all figured out! I say that out of love. But until, you open your ears and truly listen and hear things without your pride lens on, you will never reach your maximum potential.

If your an expert, post advice, but if your not post questions like you did. If you post questions have an open mind to the feedback.

Good luck to you man, I’m going to hop off this thread

 

"Your statement was that almost every investment will be negative cash flow in the first year! Completely inaccurate"  Here's my statement: "But you will technically be negative cash in almost any investment the first year..."  I then stated the example that on a positive 10% return on 50k the first year, you're still negative total cash of 45k for that first year, you put in 50k and got back 5k.  That's not a negative cash flow.  There's a difference between cash flow and total cash invested and recouped. Yes, there are absolutely investments, such as some BRRRRs that do recoup 100% of cash invested within the first year.  But a 100%+ return in the first year on an investment is nowhere near the norm of a typical investment.  

I've never had an investment have negative cash flow.  This is why I made this post, because this one would be the first if I went through with it, out of my comfort zone, but only for the first year.  Would you rather have negative cash flow for the first year followed by 17% - 30% returns every year following, or a deal with a positive cash flow of 10% every year?  



 

I'll answer the last one first. I'd rather have clear title and a simple deal for 30% COC, which isn't that hard to do, even in SFR.

Second, "cash negative" doesn't really mean anything, because you've exchanged that cash for something of value. If I put down $50k on a $250k property, I haven't lost $50k. I've bought 20% of that property (or more) with that money. I still have $50k, just in a different form. Then I start renting it. If I get $5k in profit, I'm not at -$45k, I'm at +$55k.

I'm not an accountant (though I am taking a class in Fundamentals of Accounting right now), but you're doing some financial gymnastics to make this sound like a good deal. 

If I had this fall in my lap, I'd forget the sub-to. They owe $180k and need $15k to live for the next year? Cool, offer $195k as a straight up sale, and tell them to vacate.

I know there's a lot of back and forth, but your comment about the negative cash flow was the point I was trying to make. Part of the argument for it not being a good deal was said because it's cash negative.  My argument was most investments are technically cash negative during the first year, doesn't meant that's bad because you still have the equity that cash gave you.

As far as the "gymnastics" my post must obviously not be clear... the numbers are just a typical CoCR calculation of the first year following either the first year or 18 months, understanding that there's no cash flow up front. It's like asking would you invest 14k now for a return that won't actually start until a year from now.  

The reason I wouldn't just offer the 195 is because they wanted to stay for another year in the property and that would be the only way they would agree to sell under market value and at subject to.   It's the big reason I posted about it because it's seems like the biggest risk.  If they are insisting in staying there for the next year, they're probably not going to want to leave after the year.  With a standard sale, it would be more of a "standard" eviction.  But, because if it being subject-to, my guess was there might be some more nuance to it I was wondering if anyone had any insights to.

Originally posted by @Mike Cumbie:

@Brian C.

The seller will have a $1200 hit on their DTI ratio a month until you take it. If they want to buy a house, car, motorcycle or anything else that tracks their credit, they are going to be told "Um no, you have too much debt". When asking "Huh What". The answer is going to be "You have a $1200 a month mortgage on 123 Main street". "No $100 a month 4 Wheeler for you." (Even while still living there)

They will challenge the lender and show you have title. The lender will take about 4 minutes to send you a demand for payment or they are foreclosing on their loan. 

If you feel it is a good plan, I am by no means saying don't do it. I honestly hope it works out, but as a devils advocate I have to at least point out my thoughts. 

Good Luck!

That's a god point. I'm familiar with the due on sale clause, which to be honest, I wasn't too concerned with. But I didn't think of the previous owner going to the lender and that trigger calling the loan due. I have considered refinancing it upon assuming it, but the LTV probably wouldn't be good enough to be able to do that without putting some additional money into it, which starts to defeat the point. Thanks!

Originally posted by @Todd Pultz:

@Brian C. Your statement was that almost every investment will be negative cash flow in the first year! Completely inaccurate, but you said that because it helps you feel better about your deal. And your last post said it was fair to assume most real estate deals don’t recoup their money in the first year. Again, inaccurate. Quit using broad statements. We have closed a dozen multi-family deals this year and all were 0 cash in and all refinanced in 6-8 months pulling cash out.

Your a brick wall man and you got it all figured out! I say that out of love. But until, you open your ears and truly listen and hear things without your pride lens on, you will never reach your maximum potential.

If your an expert, post advice, but if your not post questions like you did. If you post questions have an open mind to the feedback.

Good luck to you man, I’m going to hop off this thread

 

"Your statement was that almost every investment will be negative cash flow in the first year! Completely inaccurate"  Here's my statement: "But you will technically be negative cash in almost any investment the first year..."  I then stated the example that on a positive 10% return on 50k the first year, you're still negative total cash of 45k for that first year, you put in 50k and got back 5k.  That's not a negative cash flow.  There's a difference between cash flow and total cash invested and recouped. Yes, there are absolutely investments, such as some BRRRRs that do recoup 100% of cash invested within the first year.  But a 100%+ return in the first year on an investment is nowhere near the norm of a typical investment.  

I've never had an investment have negative cash flow.  This is why I made this post, because this one would be the first if I went through with it, out of my comfort zone, but only for the first year.  Would you rather have negative cash flow for the first year followed by 17% - 30% returns every year following, or a deal with a positive cash flow of 10% every year?  



 

Originally posted by @Mike Cumbie:

@Brian C.

What I am missing (and I assume others) is what are you starting with?

A house with 40K in equity.. OK great

The bank still is owed a monthly mortgage or they will own the right to foreclose (ignoring Due on sale for this discussion). The seller can't pay their mortgage payment, so you are "assuming that debt".

Someone owes the bank monthly, if they can't afford the bank note and are looking not to get kicked out, you are taking over the monthly debt. Lets say you are now paying $1200 a month to keep them from getting kicked out. They can't afford to move or even sell a property with 40K equity today. Is their position going to be increased in 12 months or are you now picking up the responsibility to foreclose? 

Assuming they leave in 12 months and say "Thanks!" The bank is still owed 180K. If they walk, they aren't keeping their name on the mortgage, are you refinancing? 

So the appeal is, I walk into a house with 40K equity in a good neighborhood and for a $14,400 cost spread out over a year. This means less cash out of pocket, I have the benefit of subject-to where I own the house, but no mortgage in my name. If the tenant walked out after 12 months, great, now I can go find a tenant I can vet.  I now own a turn key property and didn't have to pay any lender fees, etc., I have a great interest rate without it being in my name and I put little money down.  If I needed to refinance, I could, but I'd probably keep it in their name until a point I wanted to do a cash out refinance or something.  

If you could right now acquire a low maintenance, desirable house for 14,400 with 40k in equity, I think most investors would, maybe not?  The question is, is it worth  potential headache and added costs of the difficulties with the previous owner, now tenant.  I get the margins aren't that big, but decent cash flow (granted, not immediate), instant equity and adding a property to my portfolio at the cost of significantly less than the profits the other rentals kick off every month for a year or so seems worth considering to me. 

Originally posted by @Todd Pultz:

@Brian C. Sounds like you already had it figured it out and didn’t need to post. If your numbers work they work, do the deal.

However, your justification paragraph shows how much you have to learn in real estate and unless your ready to be a sponge and soak up the knowledge that so many experts have on here, these forums won’t help you. I don’t claim to be an expert, but I have pretty good experience. With that said, let me explain to you how your statement on cash on cash return in your latest post was wrong..........a few examples

Many investors use creative financing including owner financing. Often times we get into owner financing with no cash down thus making the CoC return infinite so long as the property is cash flowing

Then let's use rehab example....I get HML for purchase and rehab, but need 10% gap and holding funding. I use a passive investor to fund that gap. I again have 0 cash in the deal and my cocr is infinite

Now let’s do a recent deal we did. We purchased 21 unit at 295k at 90% leverage. Needed 31k to close so we used a passive investor to fund the gap. Property already cash flowed. Raised rents, repaired and refinanced at 6 months with appraisal of 650k. Cocr was infinite because we had 0 cash in the deal after taking out first and investor we pocketed roughly 100k.

So your comment that almost all real estate deals are negative cash flow the first year is inaccurate. Actually the typical investor tries to brrrr in some fashion so they have 0 cash in at 6 months. We don’t want to leave cash in more than 6 months. Sometimes we do, but that’s not the goal.

Not trying to beat you up Brian, but you keep making inaccurate statements attempting to justify your deal.

 What were the inaccurate statements to justify the deal?