All Forum Categories
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies

Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal



Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
All Forum Posts by: Brady Mullen
Brady Mullen has started 13 posts and replied 58 times.
Post: When Should I Use Debt?

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
Quote from @Ricardo R.:
@Brady Mullen Debt is used for --> Appreciating Assets and assets make you --> Money, preferably immediately and/or on a recurring basis. EVERYTHING ELSE is not a use for debt.
That is the only measuring stick you need and you can apply it to real estate, education, transportation, everything.
Well said, Ricardo. :)
Post: Is it a Good Time to Rent?

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
It's nearly unbelievable to me when renters say it's not a good time to buy. I want to ask them if they're trying to tell me it's a good time to rent? Cost of goods and services always trickles down to the consumer.
If you think housing is expensive, you don't avoid that because you're renting - you just don't get the equity you're paying for - you're buying it for someone else!
Of course, everyone here probably agrees with this already, but the challenge is how do we help people in our communities understand this for what it is?!
The fact that our children graduate high school having no clue how this works but can probably write out the quadratic equation is mind-boggling.
Post: The Cost of Waiting - A Different Way to Look at It

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Brady Mullen:
This is great. It's tempting to look at today's interest rates as "high". And it makes sense, since you were born after about 1985, your only experience with interest rates as an adult tells you that they should be below 5%.
They touched below 5% for the first time ever in 2009, then they plunged below that in 2010 for a little over a decade. This had NEVER happened before. There was a glut of inventory on the market, and lowering rates was a good way to sop that up.
Don't expect this again. It may never happen in our lifetimes.
It's now back to investing and working.
But here's something to consider. Interest rates are like gasoline. Do I know how much gasoline costs? Yes! I can't help but notice because it's in my face everywhere!
And what would happen if I pulled up next to the pump and gasoline cost me $7/gallon (it's currently about $4 where I am)? Would I sulk and drive away without gasoline? No way! Gasoline is worth about $20/gallon to me, give or take.
So I may not like that they're asking me to pay $7, but in reality, it's so valuable to me to get where I need to go so easily, I'm going to pay it happily and be grateful I can get where I need to go in a comfortable vehicle with air conditioning and a podcast and my phone connected to bluetooth so I can talk to anyone I want.
Getting the bank to lend me money to purchase a small business (a rental home) is so valuable. If I insist on cash flowing, I may have to put more than 20% down in Denver, but so be it. I'm purchasing a small business that will pay itself off. Would I like lower rates? Of course I would. Even if I have 3% financing on a property, I'd like a lower rate.
But let's not kid ourselves. The bank financing our purchase of one of the most reliable small businesses that sells a service everyone needs (shelter) is AMAZING!
This could also be said for purchasing your own residence (instead of renting). Don't wait for rates to come down. If they do, refinance, if they up further, you'll be glad you got the rate you got.
Great analogy, I'm going to borrow that going forward, they are very much the same.
You pull up to get gas, and if it's $7gal, yeah you flip, it suck, but your gonna buy it because it's not optional for the vast majority to simply not drive, you gotta. Now, you will rethink your spending, right. Try to be as budget concious as possible, but if ya gotta go 100miles, ya gotta go 100miles, right.
A roof over ones head is also not optional for the vast majority. Yeah, the prices suck, so you get really budget focused, but end of day if you NEED a 3br, you find a way to pony up for a 3br. Hence why more and more people are doing multi-gen living. That's not walking away from buying, it's figuring out HOW to buy.
Now, in both cases, what happens when the price goes DOWN just 10,15,20%? AND it doesn't have to be because the price went down, let's say you get a coupon for 20% off your gas, what happens? You go fill up right? yeah, and then what? You go make that long drive you've been putting off to visit Mom/ brother, the Dells, whatever. THAT is pent up demand in action.
Exact same for housing, price and rate doesn't have to drop for it to become more affordable. A change of terms can be a "coupon" and what will people do? Snatch it up in a second.
Imagine giving an entire city a 20% coupon on gas, what happens? A line 3 blocks long at the gas station right. And all those people calling their friends saying "hey, you better hurry up and get in while you can, I don't know how long this will last". FOMO in action.
Wait and see, it's coming.
Good point. It's nearly unbelievable to me when renters say it's not a good time to buy. I want to ask them if they're trying to tell me it's a good time to rent? Cost of goods and services always trickles down to the consumer. They are paying for it, whether it's to the lender or the landlord.
If housing is expensive, you don't avoid that because you're renting - you just don't get the equity you're paying for - it belongs to someone else!
The fact that our children graduate high school having no clue how this works but can probably write out the quadratic equation is mind boggling.
Post: Consider This Regarding Interest Rates

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
It's tempting to look at today's interest rates as "high". And it makes sense, since if you were born after about 1985, your only experience with interest rates as an adult tells you that they should be below 5%.
They touched below 5% for the first time ever in 2009, then they plunged below that in 2010 for a little over a decade. This had NEVER happened before. There was a glut of inventory on the market, and lowering rates was a good way to sop that up.
Don't expect this again. It may never happen in our lifetimes.
It's now back to investing and working. They are no longer passing out homes like Oprah passes out cars.
But here's something to consider. Interest rates are like gasoline. Do I know how much gasoline costs? Yes! I can't help but notice because it's in my face everywhere!
And what would happen if I pulled up next to the pump and gasoline cost me $7/gallon (it's currently about $4 where I am)? Would I sulk and drive away without gasoline? No way! Gasoline is worth about $20/gallon to me, give or take. Probably more, really.
So I may not like that they're asking me to pay $7, but in reality, it's so valuable to me to get where I need to go so easily, I'm going to pay it happily and be grateful I can get where I need to go in a comfortable vehicle with air conditioning and a podcast and my phone connected to bluetooth so I can talk to anyone I want.
Getting the bank to lend me money to purchase a small business (a rental home) is so valuable. If I insist on cash flowing, I may have to put more than 20% down in Denver, but so be it. Or maybe I endure a few years of negative cash flow, which makes sense. I'm purchasing a small business and a piece of real estate. Why would I expect that not to cost me something? Would I like lower rates? Of course I would. Even if I have 3% financing on a property, I'd like a lower rate. But it's silly to act like I deserve some low rate that existed in the past under very unusual circumstances.
Let's not kid ourselves. The bank financing our purchase of one of the most reliable small businesses that sells a service everyone needs (shelter) is AMAZING!
This could also be said for purchasing your own residence (instead of renting). Don't wait for rates to come down. If they do, refinance, if they up further, you'll be glad you got the rate you got.
The value of this opportunity is unreal at 5%, 7%, 9%, 12%. Clearly, it's better at 5%, but since that's not available, why are we talking about it? We are not owed immediate cash flow at 20% down on a great asset...
Post: The Cost of Waiting - A Different Way to Look at It

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
This is great. It's tempting to look at today's interest rates as "high". And it makes sense, since you were born after about 1985, your only experience with interest rates as an adult tells you that they should be below 5%.
They touched below 5% for the first time ever in 2009, then they plunged below that in 2010 for a little over a decade. This had NEVER happened before. There was a glut of inventory on the market, and lowering rates was a good way to sop that up.
Don't expect this again. It may never happen in our lifetimes.
It's now back to investing and working.
But here's something to consider. Interest rates are like gasoline. Do I know how much gasoline costs? Yes! I can't help but notice because it's in my face everywhere!
And what would happen if I pulled up next to the pump and gasoline cost me $7/gallon (it's currently about $4 where I am)? Would I sulk and drive away without gasoline? No way! Gasoline is worth about $20/gallon to me, give or take.
So I may not like that they're asking me to pay $7, but in reality, it's so valuable to me to get where I need to go so easily, I'm going to pay it happily and be grateful I can get where I need to go in a comfortable vehicle with air conditioning and a podcast and my phone connected to bluetooth so I can talk to anyone I want.
Getting the bank to lend me money to purchase a small business (a rental home) is so valuable. If I insist on cash flowing, I may have to put more than 20% down in Denver, but so be it. I'm purchasing a small business that will pay itself off. Would I like lower rates? Of course I would. Even if I have 3% financing on a property, I'd like a lower rate.
But let's not kid ourselves. The bank financing our purchase of one of the most reliable small businesses that sells a service everyone needs (shelter) is AMAZING!
This could also be said for purchasing your own residence (instead of renting). Don't wait for rates to come down. If they do, refinance, if they up further, you'll be glad you got the rate you got.
Post: When Should I Use Debt?

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
It's undeniable that debt has the power to consume. Anyone who has let credit card debt run amuck can attest to this.
I'm writing this from a place of humility. I have learned some of these lessons the VERY hard way.
But debt can also be a useful tool.
Think about how difficult it would be to get out of the renting cycle and own your home if it weren't for debt (mortgage).
Many smart businesses use debt tactically and strategically to stay nimble and flexible with their resources.
My point here is not to cast a vote for or against debt - it's too nuanced a subject for that type of judgement. I would like to offer some ideas on how to think about it properly and how to control it.
I think of it like fire - incredibly useful and incredibly dangerous.
For starters, my first test a debt would have to pass before I'd consider it would be if the debt will reliably provide the means to repay itself.
For example, if I get a 70% mortgage on a rental property, and if the income will cover the debt obligations, then this is something entirely different than borrowing money to purchase an expensive car just to impress people.
Debt to produce the income to pay for itself not the only metric I'd look at, but it's a good place to start.
This counts for education, too.
If I am pursuing a well-paying job that I can expect to get after completing the required degree, then debt might be a useful tool for that. And if that job provides me the additional income to pay off that debt, then I can see a valid argument for this.
However, if I want a career that pays roughly $60,000 but requires a degree that costs me $80,000, using debt for this seems like chaining a ball to my foot that will be very difficult to remove.
You can get a $60,000/yr job without a degree. If you're skeptical of this, you're either not thinking hard enough or unwilling to consider certain types of very respectable work. Think trades… $60,000/yr is the low end for many of the trades.
If I REALLY wanted that career that required the degree for personal reasons, then there is nothing wrong with pursuing it! But I'd try to get that degree without the debt. It would fall into the "luxury" category, which should not be acquired through debt.
Anyone else got any metrics they use to determine whether a debt makes sense for them?
Post: The Cost of Waiting - A Different Way to Look at It

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
Quote from @Dan H.:
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Randall Alan:
Quote from @Brady Mullen:
You've probably heard the "would you rather" scenario about being offered $1M or a penny that doubles every day for a month, right?
Well, consider this little twist…
So, in case you haven't heard, a penny that doubles 30 times is much more than $1M. It's $5.4M!
Hopefully we've experienced enough compounding "aha" moments that we know to not trust our instincts - compounding regularly defies our intuitions.
What if instead of starting the penny today, you put it off until tomorrow? Maybe your kid needs a ride to soccer tonight, or you're going to Scott's house for dinner, or you got sucked into some funny social media videos. It can wait until tomorrow.
If you start the penny tomorrow, then tomorrow, you'll only be behind by 1 penny, right?
But on the 30th day, you're behind by $2.7M!
By waiting, we give up what happens at the end of the compounding equation, not at the beginning. The difference in the beginning is always unnoticeable (or at least unimpressive), but it's the end we're sacrificing.
You may object by saying, "I'll just have to invest a little longer to make up." But that's not really what's on offer here. If there were more time, then you'd be even further behind! You'd have one more day to double the $5.4M to $10.8M!
Now, I don't know an investment that will double your money every day, but it helps align our intuitions with reality.
Waiting to do something that is financially smart (and therefore usually involves compounding) costs much more than our intuitions would indicate. We sacrifice what happens at the end!
I’m all about investing in real estate. We have 37 units that we required mostly from 2018 to 2020. We have seen or equity, triple in that amount of time. But if your argument is that the new investor should be investing in real estate today, I might go against that somewhat. All that is compounding today is your interest rate it seems… in the sense that it has tripled over the past 18 months. That combined with real estate prices that remain very high I think make for a sound argument that presently it is not a favorable environment to be pulling the trigger on most real estate investment opportunities.
As soon as rates and prices settle back down, I would be all on board with your premise that sooner is better than later. If you can find a great deal that will cash flow today, that would be reason enough to do it. But very little is cash flowing at 7-8% interest.
Randy
But that's the rub Randy, your using completely wrong assumptions in your waiting vs action thoughts.
This may get a bit complex at first but I assure it's a simplification and if follow along, comprehend each step, it just may be a complete "ah-ha" moment.
Todays prices, reflect todays rates.
This a paramount, let me say again, TODAYS prices, reflect TODAYS rates. What is being bought and sold today, is at TODAYS rates. Really soak that in. At these "high" rates, everything being bought and sold now is in full knowledge and acceptance of this fact. Because there is no getting around it right.
So, what your arguing is (a) today's prices are too high. And/or (b) todays rates are also too high. And that (c) when rates come down it will be "better". Or when prices "come down" it will be better.
That is a total mirage. I get why you'd think it, but it's exactly the same as thinking if you could flap your arms up and down fast enough, you'll fly. It just isn't so in reality.
When RATES Come down:
Prices will SURGE! Yes, with 100% certainty, notice I did NOT say "may" or "could", I am that absolutely certain of the factuality that here I am saying it for the whole world that; when rates come down prices will SURGE UP!
We have fundamental facts that we have housing SHORTAGE, it's why homes are still being bought at levels they are. AND we have PENT-UP-DEMAND being created. What that? Volume has fallen off a cliff, by more than 50% in general and volume as a whole is VERY low vs most any time. Now keep in mind there is MORE people. people didn't just decide they don't want to live in a home, they simply can't afford to buy. That's peent up demand.
So, when rates decline, making it more affordable to buy, people WILL! That is MORE demand, and that additional demand will do exactly as it does of driving UP prices.
The lower the rate, the more purchasing power (whole $ sales total) for the same monthly payment.
Every month rents go UP, guess what happens? The price motive point for a person to buy a home at goes UP. Rents are leading and creating what the fair market value of buying a home will be tomorrow. It's mathematical.
If a markets average rent is $1,500 mnth, why would people buy a home, the same home, for an average cost of $2k per month? They have a PRICE MOTIVE to rent vs buy. In exact same paradigm, as market rents press too $2k per month, when rates drop to make is feasible for a person to buy a similar home, at or near a monthly price of that $2k, THEY WILL BUY.
The rates dictate how much the sale price is, the buyer is focused on that $2k per month. Buyers care little if the $2k per month buys $170k or $240k, actually if anything human ego comes into play and they feel more achieving with the HIGHER not lower amount because again, budgets are on the PAYMENT not the purchase price.
So your premise that rates are "too high" to buy is backwards! NOW is when you SHOULD be buying, because as rates drop, prices WILL, with absolute certainty, go UP! That is what we coin an "equity investment".
Now, for PRICES going down.
Exactly how are prices going to come down? Are tax's going to be reduced to make all the items that go into making a home cheaper? Are millions of people going to choose to go live in tents and just give up there home? Remember every person selling a home needs a new one to put over their head.
Are builders going to stop throttling supply and collectively choose to build homes to sell at a net loss?
And again, pent up demand. We have WAY more people with pressure to buy today there 1 limiter is affordability. You start lowering price and that makes it MORE affordable, opening up MORE buyers and "POW" it's gone. That is what's insulating from a sizable decline in prices.
The ONLY way you get the buying opportunity your thinking, where rents day 1 are 8-cap+, is 30 million Americans roll-over and die, or you drop rates while removing everyone's capacity to buy, like 30 million put on unemployment tomorrow.
The math is clear. We have near 8% interest rates and the "crash' is still NOT happening. Every street is still lined with "hiring" signs. Any job lost has 20 ready to take them up tomorrow.
If WWIII pop's off there will be MORE work demand, MORE employment and LESS people. How do we get to dropping rates and LESS employment?
That's simply NOT realistic.
The market you bought in was a post COLLAPSE economy, that is NOT normal, it's not regular, and it's G-O-N-E!. People need to wrap there head's around this fact, '08' is over, done, gone. This is a more normal market now, where you can't buy a paycheck, you have to actually INVEST. yes, it's difficult to get it right, just like any NORMAL investing is. It requires advanced knowledge, strategy, effort, timing, placement, it's NOT simple. And it requires TIME.
It is called INVESTING, what other investing does not require time? What other investing is a paycheck month 1? Yet for some reason there is a perverse thought that Real Estate INVESTING should be a universe apart. it's NOT.
Opportunity is NOT dead and gone, it's just different. Yes, it's harder, it looks different, welcome to investing.
If you are not finding the opportunity, maybe your looking with the wrong eyes? There is a long list of people doing AMAZING right now today, at todays rates. That is the difference from those looking back vs those living in the now.
The only thing that could make another buying potential it was last decade, will put you in a place you couldn't buy if you wanted to. So the false idea that everything can burn to the ground but your Teflon and will buy the ashes, is a self-lie unless your last name is Hilton or Heinz.
When rates came down at the Great Recession, it took ~4 years for prices to surge. The prices often do not surge over night or even in a couple years.
I do not claim to know what the future holds (certainly I do not claim to see the future with 100% certainty), but I know my underwriting is showing large negative cash flow at high LTV. I can see commercial residential cap rates rising in many/most markets. I can see a scenario where commercial residential impacts non-commercial residential. I see more passive investments that beat the return I am showing on newly acquired RE at the current rates.
Does this mean I guarantee that an RE investment today is not going to do great? No, too many variables for me to guarantee much related to the future (few things in future I would claim with 100% certainty). I use my underwriting to evaluate my RE investments realizing that Residential RE is not passive and for me to choose it, it does not only need to match the expected return of more passive options but beat it to warrant the effort.
You indicate multiple times when rates drop. I do not know if rates are going to drop significantly any time soon. I lean towards not, but again do not claim with 100% certainty.
As for renting driving sales, there are only a few large city markets were it is initially cheaper to own than to rent.
I have not purchased RE since Dec 2021 and have zero regrets on staying on the sidelines.
This does not imply that I do not look at the plethora of RE that hits my mailbox daily looking for something that meets my criteria. I am not finding purchases that meet my criteria in spite of getting dozens of off market properties sent to my mailbox every day.
I have two challenges here. And I mean all of this with sincere respect. I'm writing here to help sharpen my tools and have an open conversation.
First, I don't think we can compare what's happening today to the 2008 RE crash. It is so different in fundamental ways. There is not 100% financing on stated income loans for everyone, first of all. And inventory is in a completely different state. Although those things are related, they are also different.
Second, and this is my more fundamental question, is this - why do people use the term "sitting on the sidelines?" There is no such thing. I know that what people mean is "cash", but that is not the sidelines. This is a cage match - once you have wealth, you're in a ring, not a football field. There are no sidelines.
You seem to have done well, which is commendable, so I'm not challenging that. What I am bringing to light is that cash, while it doesn't "lose" value on statements, has lost tremendous value in the real world.
And interest on savings accounts is, by design, almost always less than inflation.
I guess my point is that while buying real estate is not what it used to be, and I don't think it ever will be again in my lifetime, it is still a valid option. And you can always find reasons not to do something because there is no such thing as a risk-free investment.
What I want to hear when anyone says "don't invest in this" is their recommendation for what they think I should be investing in. The sidelines is not an option. Cash is an investment choice that I am not comfortable with for large amounts of my capital.
Post: The Cost of Waiting - A Different Way to Look at It

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
Quote from @James Hamling:
Quote from @Randall Alan:
Quote from @Brady Mullen:
You've probably heard the "would you rather" scenario about being offered $1M or a penny that doubles every day for a month, right?
Well, consider this little twist…
So, in case you haven't heard, a penny that doubles 30 times is much more than $1M. It's $5.4M!
Hopefully we've experienced enough compounding "aha" moments that we know to not trust our instincts - compounding regularly defies our intuitions.
What if instead of starting the penny today, you put it off until tomorrow? Maybe your kid needs a ride to soccer tonight, or you're going to Scott's house for dinner, or you got sucked into some funny social media videos. It can wait until tomorrow.
If you start the penny tomorrow, then tomorrow, you'll only be behind by 1 penny, right?
But on the 30th day, you're behind by $2.7M!
By waiting, we give up what happens at the end of the compounding equation, not at the beginning. The difference in the beginning is always unnoticeable (or at least unimpressive), but it's the end we're sacrificing.
You may object by saying, "I'll just have to invest a little longer to make up." But that's not really what's on offer here. If there were more time, then you'd be even further behind! You'd have one more day to double the $5.4M to $10.8M!
Now, I don't know an investment that will double your money every day, but it helps align our intuitions with reality.
Waiting to do something that is financially smart (and therefore usually involves compounding) costs much more than our intuitions would indicate. We sacrifice what happens at the end!
I’m all about investing in real estate. We have 37 units that we required mostly from 2018 to 2020. We have seen or equity, triple in that amount of time. But if your argument is that the new investor should be investing in real estate today, I might go against that somewhat. All that is compounding today is your interest rate it seems… in the sense that it has tripled over the past 18 months. That combined with real estate prices that remain very high I think make for a sound argument that presently it is not a favorable environment to be pulling the trigger on most real estate investment opportunities.
As soon as rates and prices settle back down, I would be all on board with your premise that sooner is better than later. If you can find a great deal that will cash flow today, that would be reason enough to do it. But very little is cash flowing at 7-8% interest.
Randy
But that's the rub Randy, your using completely wrong assumptions in your waiting vs action thoughts.
This may get a bit complex at first but I assure it's a simplification and if follow along, comprehend each step, it just may be a complete "ah-ha" moment.
Todays prices, reflect todays rates.
This a paramount, let me say again, TODAYS prices, reflect TODAYS rates. What is being bought and sold today, is at TODAYS rates. Really soak that in. At these "high" rates, everything being bought and sold now is in full knowledge and acceptance of this fact. Because there is no getting around it right.
So, what your arguing is (a) today's prices are too high. And/or (b) todays rates are also too high. And that (c) when rates come down it will be "better". Or when prices "come down" it will be better.
That is a total mirage. I get why you'd think it, but it's exactly the same as thinking if you could flap your arms up and down fast enough, you'll fly. It just isn't so in reality.
When RATES Come down:
Prices will SURGE! Yes, with 100% certainty, notice I did NOT say "may" or "could", I am that absolutely certain of the factuality that here I am saying it for the whole world that; when rates come down prices will SURGE UP!
We have fundamental facts that we have housing SHORTAGE, it's why homes are still being bought at levels they are. AND we have PENT-UP-DEMAND being created. What that? Volume has fallen off a cliff, by more than 50% in general and volume as a whole is VERY low vs most any time. Now keep in mind there is MORE people. people didn't just decide they don't want to live in a home, they simply can't afford to buy. That's peent up demand.
So, when rates decline, making it more affordable to buy, people WILL! That is MORE demand, and that additional demand will do exactly as it does of driving UP prices.
The lower the rate, the more purchasing power (whole $ sales total) for the same monthly payment.
Every month rents go UP, guess what happens? The price motive point for a person to buy a home at goes UP. Rents are leading and creating what the fair market value of buying a home will be tomorrow. It's mathematical.
If a markets average rent is $1,500 mnth, why would people buy a home, the same home, for an average cost of $2k per month? They have a PRICE MOTIVE to rent vs buy. In exact same paradigm, as market rents press too $2k per month, when rates drop to make is feasible for a person to buy a similar home, at or near a monthly price of that $2k, THEY WILL BUY.
The rates dictate how much the sale price is, the buyer is focused on that $2k per month. Buyers care little if the $2k per month buys $170k or $240k, actually if anything human ego comes into play and they feel more achieving with the HIGHER not lower amount because again, budgets are on the PAYMENT not the purchase price.
So your premise that rates are "too high" to buy is backwards! NOW is when you SHOULD be buying, because as rates drop, prices WILL, with absolute certainty, go UP! That is what we coin an "equity investment".
Now, for PRICES going down.
Exactly how are prices going to come down? Are tax's going to be reduced to make all the items that go into making a home cheaper? Are millions of people going to choose to go live in tents and just give up there home? Remember every person selling a home needs a new one to put over their head.
Are builders going to stop throttling supply and collectively choose to build homes to sell at a net loss?
And again, pent up demand. We have WAY more people with pressure to buy today there 1 limiter is affordability. You start lowering price and that makes it MORE affordable, opening up MORE buyers and "POW" it's gone. That is what's insulating from a sizable decline in prices.
The ONLY way you get the buying opportunity your thinking, where rents day 1 are 8-cap+, is 30 million Americans roll-over and die, or you drop rates while removing everyone's capacity to buy, like 30 million put on unemployment tomorrow.
The math is clear. We have near 8% interest rates and the "crash' is still NOT happening. Every street is still lined with "hiring" signs. Any job lost has 20 ready to take them up tomorrow.
If WWIII pop's off there will be MORE work demand, MORE employment and LESS people. How do we get to dropping rates and LESS employment?
That's simply NOT realistic.
The market you bought in was a post COLLAPSE economy, that is NOT normal, it's not regular, and it's G-O-N-E!. People need to wrap there head's around this fact, '08' is over, done, gone. This is a more normal market now, where you can't buy a paycheck, you have to actually INVEST. yes, it's difficult to get it right, just like any NORMAL investing is. It requires advanced knowledge, strategy, effort, timing, placement, it's NOT simple. And it requires TIME.
It is called INVESTING, what other investing does not require time? What other investing is a paycheck month 1? Yet for some reason there is a perverse thought that Real Estate INVESTING should be a universe apart. it's NOT.
Opportunity is NOT dead and gone, it's just different. Yes, it's harder, it looks different, welcome to investing.
If you are not finding the opportunity, maybe your looking with the wrong eyes? There is a long list of people doing AMAZING right now today, at todays rates. That is the difference from those looking back vs those living in the now.
The only thing that could make another buying potential it was last decade, will put you in a place you couldn't buy if you wanted to. So the false idea that everything can burn to the ground but your Teflon and will buy the ashes, is a self-lie unless your last name is Hilton or Heinz.
I like how @James Hamling put it: you can't just buy a paycheck. Well said.
It's true that it was that way, but holding out for that environment to return with a significant portion of assets in cash seems unwise to me.
Post: The Cost of Waiting - A Different Way to Look at It

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
Quote from @Randall Alan:
Quote from @Brady Mullen:
Thanks, Randy. I am not making that argument. I'm just making the point about the important relationship of time in compounding.
However, I'm curious about something else now... I notice people all over the internet pointing out imperfections in every investment strategy, but I always want to ask what they do recommend? Because doing nothing is not an option.
I've heard people say things like "staying on the sidelines", but what I think they usually mean is keeping cash. But that is still an asset choice. There is no real way of opting out, once you have wealth, right?
If rates are too high, and prices remain "very high", what asset class are you recommending? Stocks? Bonds? Cash? And I really mean something that the masses can use, not something specifically available to people with particular skills like hard money lending, flipping properties, etc. Those can be great, of course, but they are not typically something a busy adult can access without any experience.
If this is coming across as confrontational, that is the furthest thing from my intention. I am sincerely asking your opinion and hoping to have a productive dialog.
@Brady Mullen
A 5% return on your money in a high-yield savings account beats a $200 per month return on the $50,000 it would take to buy a $200,000 house today ( on a yearly basis). So in that sense, yes, cash is a better place to be if you can’t get a better return on real estate.
As interest rates drop, so will cash returns, and real estate will once again be in favor over cash. Our saying is that you do with the markets tell you to do. Right now the real estate market is saying stay put.
Randy
Respectfully, I'd rather get $200/mo from a $50k investment in real estate (a down payment on a $200k asset) than 5% from a savings account. Because I also have a leveraged asset. If it appreciates by 3% ($200,000 x 3% = $6,000), then I got another 12% on my $50k investment ($6,000/$50,000 = 12%) PLUS the cash flow AND some debt paydown AND tax benefits.
I'd even be willing to achieve a net $0 cash flow before I'd keep my money in cash, even at 5% savings rate. In the REI, I'd still expect some appreciation (eventually), equity through debt paydown, and tax benefits. All of which I'd expect to produce more than 5% annually.
Cash flow is important (especially when I want to stop working), but the majority of wealth in real estate comes from building equity (leveraged appreciation and debt paydown).
I will hold cash for the benefits it offers (liquidity), but I just can't get comfortable holding it as an investment.
I also don't see an asset class as basic to human needs as real estate meaningfully dropping in price when there is a national inventory shortage.
I'll be the first to admit that I don't KNOW what the future brings, but until someone talks me out of it, I'm going to keep acquiring real estate. In an unknowable future, I'd rather have an asset than a currency.
Post: The Cost of Waiting - A Different Way to Look at It

- Denver, CO
- Posts 59
- Votes 100
Thanks, Randy. I am not making that argument. I'm just making the point about the important relationship of time in compounding.
However, I'm curious about something else now... I notice people all over the internet pointing out imperfections in every investment strategy, but I always want to ask what they do recommend? Because doing nothing is not an option.
I've heard people say things like "staying on the sidelines", but what I think they usually mean is keeping cash. But that is still an asset choice. There is no real way of opting out, once you have wealth, right?
If rates are too high, and prices remain "very high", what asset class are you recommending? Stocks? Bonds? Cash? And I really mean something that the masses can use, not something specifically available to people with particular skills like hard money lending, flipping properties, etc. Those can be great, of course, but they are not typically something a busy adult can access without any experience.
If this is coming across as confrontational, that is the furthest thing from my intention. I am sincerely asking your opinion and hoping to have a productive dialog.