Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Bryan P.

Bryan P. has started 36 posts and replied 104 times.

Post: 50% rule and Refi

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

JScott,

My rental's Principal/Interest/Taxes/Insurance is 500. The rent is 600. I only cash flow about 100. (I didn't count depreciation or interest deduction) That is 13% which is not even close to 50%. Eventually this cost is going to catch up.

My primary home, which I will have to move out of due to relocation, has a PITI of 510. It can rent for about 600. That's again around 13%. This cost will also catch up.

Luckily I have a good job (teaching job) and I have some extra money per month. I don't want to get slammed with expenses from the two rental properties.

The problem lies in the fact that both loans are short. The first property (the rental) is a 10 year loan. My primary is a 15 year loan. This is why I'm stuck at 13% (or thereabouts).

I don't understand how this can't be an issue? I"m going to lose money eventually. Why shouldn't refinancing to a longer term be a smart move?

Post: 50% rule and Refi

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

Closing on 2 properties would cost approx 3200. Going to 30 year notes would do the following (Is it even possible to get 30 year notes on investment properties):

I would take property #1 from 13% to 45%.
I would take property #2 from 19% to 52%.

Post: 50% rule and Refi

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

Obviously a wise person would put away 6 months to 1 year of operating expenses for any property. Assuming that one did this, when following the 50% rule, is the property then labeled "self-sufficient?"

If this is true, one would theoretically buy alot of properties with not alot of reserve/emergency cash and credit. (Oh wait, that's me.) Am I thinking correctly here?

I'm trying to determine whether I should refinance my two properties into longer terms so I can actually meet the 50% rule. Before I started reading BP, I didn't know any of this and I had already acquired the two properties on 15 and 10 year notes (stupid). So now I have two properties that aren't even meeting 25%, let alone 50%. I'll lose thousands of dollars by refinancing due to closing costs, but it might be worth it.

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

Jeff,

What about using equity to pay for emergencies? I have 18,000 in equity for emergencies. Is this a not-good way to go?

I should just probably refinance the freaking properties.

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

I should probably include that on my primary, it's appraised at 70. I owe 32 on it. So I have about 7 years left on the loan and I bought it 2 years ago. So I've made some progress.

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

Jeff,

My first property is my current home which I will rent in the next few years. It's a 15 year loan at 5%. The PI is 513. I can get 650 rent. That's a crapshoot.

My only rental property was bought (downpayment 30% plus repairs 5K) with a line of credit on my primary. So the PI for this property is 475 and it rents 600. 125 cash flow. It's only a 10 year loan. That's what makes the cash flow lower than if it was a 20 year. Again, this investment is not great.

So my thought is....I better hold onto these properties a while or if I do invest in another property, I BETTER do the 50% rule or I'll be truly screwed down the line.

I probably need to flip a property or two to get some cash. I don't have alot of cash on hand. (I'm a teacher for crying out loud.)

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

The reason I ask is because I COULD theoretically buy two more rental properties with the equity I have in the two properties that I own. However, I would have NO equity in case an emergency occurs. So it seems to me I would have to find a property that REALLY matches the 50% rule. I can tell you that both of the properties I own now DON'T match the 50% rule. I'm about 25% on both.

If I don't allot the 50% rule with the next property I buy, I could become an overleveraged bankrupt idiot.

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

I guess a part of this is overleveraging with bad investment properties. Can't forget the bad part.

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

It's obvious that it happens. I was more or less looking for personal examples or close friends/family that overleveraged in buy-hold real estate and screwed themselves. Maybe had to sell for a loss, maybe bankruptcy.....who knows. I'm just curious.

Post: Overleveraging...

Bryan P.Posted
  • Posts 136
  • Votes 3

Can anybody give some good real-life examples of people (or yourselves) that have overleveraged themselves in buy-hold real estate? What did it look like? What happened? What were the consequences?

Thanks!