Originally posted by "MikeOH":
Lisa asked if her deal was a good one and I said no! That is my honest opinion. In fact, I said it was a TERRIBLE deal. If you have a different opinion, then say so. Do you think she should buy a property that loses $1,158 each month and hope for future appreciation? Why not give us a direct answer instead of all the generalities? How many of these "deals" could she afford. With $300,000 cash, she would be broke in 6 months if she had 50 of these "investments".
Mike
It's probably not a good deal by any means, but it's not as bad as you make it out to be if the property is somewhere that, for some special reason, will see good appreciation. Given what she said, 6.5% loan, $335K price, 80% LTV, 2600 in rents, and assuming 50% operating expenses, 5% yearly appreciation, 3% yearly increase in operating expenses and rent, she would make money any year she sold the property and her cumulative negative cash flow would never get higher than $22,000 while she held it, and that is figuring 50% operating expenses straight through. With all the capital expenses shoved out to later years (being a brand new property), if she sold fairly early on, the numbers look even better.
Higher end houses do appreciate especially if they are in some special situation (lake front, new business going in nearby, etc), and that is pretty much the only way you can make money off of them. If you can take the hit for several years, it can be well worth it. You don't look at it as losing money every year, you look at it as part of the cost of getting the return you are looking for.