Originally posted by @Bill B.:
Sounds good @Bob Stein so you do know what you’re risking. If they vacuumed and cleaned (all they were required to do by lease.) you’re risking the judge giving the tenants twice as much as you withhold if you don’t win. So if you think you’ll win 75% of the time in court you’re a little less than 10% better off than just paying for it yourself.
In the general terms, it says carpet must be vacuumed and cleaned. However, in the pet section it says:
Tenant agrees that any damage to the exterior or interior of the Premises, grounds, flooring, walls, trim, finish, tiles, carpeting, or any stains, etc., caused by the pet/s will be the full financial responsibility of the Tenant and that Tenant agrees to pay all costs involved in the restoration to its original condition. If because of any such stains, etc., said damage is such that it cannot be removed, then Tenant hereby agrees to pay the full expense of replacement.
Is dander and hair considered damage?