Mr Hinrichs,
1. One sarcastic comment deserves another.
2. Writing a book means nothing to me.
3. You chiming in and offering your opinion is no different that me offering mine. I suggest we all stay in our lane.
4. Both of you made it all about you and your dealings and forgot about the original poster. Everything I commented on was for her benefit not for yours. Mr Scott turned it to me and questioned my opinion. I responded accordingly.
5. Now you have decided to do the same.
6. You wrote 5 or 6 paragraphs about you and your dealings which has nothing to do with the original poster.
7. My response to the poster was for her benefit not for you two to try and pick me apart.
8. Subtle sarcasm is not hard to read. I picked up on it and responded, which now makes you feel compelled to fire back me. I'm not thinned skin.
9. I could go on but I'll leave you with this. Probably not the best idea to insert yourself in the middle of two people debating. It's not a humble move but an elementary one.
It's apparent that my posts weren't read in its entirety, otherwise we wouldn't be here in the first place.