@Mike D'Arrigo. Thanks for your response. Since you live in Cali you’ve seen first hand what appreciation does.
my point is that as long as you have a cash flow neutral or slightly positive property in California the equity growth is hard to match. Even during the worst downturn in 2008, while home prices plummeted , rents stayed about the same and eventually rose so I was able to hold onto that property without issues.
Example : paid for property for $500,000 that broke even in 2005 with rents , at the height of the real estate market. I definitely over paid. Rent was $2600 but it paid for all expenses and netted me $40 a month.i consider this cash flow neutral. market crashed in 2008 but I contiene to hold the property. Home price dropped by 40% however rents never dropped. In fact they continued to go up.
Property is now worth 1million despite going through the worst recession ever.
rents are not $4500 btw.
I would not be able to find any deals like this in Kansas or Indi and I own there personally myself as well.
An investor can speculate as long as the cashflow is stable in my opinion.
So many pundits told investors to stay out of cyclical markets after 2008 and I ( and many others )listened to them and avoided California and coastal markets. Investors investors did well when they zigged when others zagged or basically when they ignored the pundits of avoiding.