Thanks guys. Really appreciate all the feedback. A few more details to add…
We have had major execution problems on this house. Where we stand now is this: we either sell the property for a very small profit, get back to cash and move on to bigger/better projects, or we keep the house as a rental. The appraisal issues aren’t so much about us wanting a better offer and more profit, it’s just another nudge pushing us towards keeping the house.
Also, I’ve learned the buyer cannot close without help at closing. So while the delta from appraisal is only 2k under normal circumstances, it will actually work out to be more than that. I had agreed to do some repairs after the buyer’s inspection, and now I’ve got additional repairs required by the lender. We will have to re-negotiate repairs to make this work.
My wife is our agent, and she did prepare a comparable sales packet for the appraiser.
I’ve learned some interesting things from reviewing the appraisal. The major issue is that the 3 comps the appraiser used to determine the value are all smaller than ours. When he added an adjustment to account for the size differences, he only valued the additional square footage at $40/sq ft. Comparable homes are selling at $150/ sq ft. Build cost at a minimum is $95/sq ft. Even if the appraiser had just used build cost at $95/sq ft, our property would have appraised at > 250k. There is already a separate adjustment for age of the house, so I don’t think this is a depreciation issue. I don’t know how the $40/sq ft is justified.
My wife and I prepared a packet over the weekend to challenge the low adjustment for additional sq ft. We also provided another comp that would work more in our favor, and is justifiable (better reflection of age and size of our house compared to one of the other comps). We’re trying to give the appraiser some “options to consider,” as well as being very careful with how we word our critique of his work. We’ll see where it goes.