Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Anwer Shaikh

Anwer Shaikh has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

@Dave Foster I remember phone a friend. Although sometime these 1031 scenarios seem like 50:50 :)  I would greatly appreciate it if you could shed some light on one other thing that is happening in this purchase. The purchase is for a single tenant triple net retail space. The tenant lease states that the tenant is responsible for paying property taxes unless the property tax increase is due to the sale of the property in which case the tenant is excluded from the property tax increase for a period of 5 years. Current tax value of the property is 800k less than purchase price. The county is very proactive in updating tax values in year of sale. The brokers calculated a jump of 30k in property taxes after sale. The seller agreed to put 150k (30k*5years) in escrow. Every year the title company will review the property tax statement and will pay the increase in property taxes from escrow to the buyer up to an amount of 30k so he can cover the difference in the property taxes. If the property tax increase amount is under 30k the seller gets reimbursed the difference for that year. Any amount left over at the end of year 5 is also reimbursed to the seller. Would this constitute a boot of 150k to the buyer as well? QI is telling my friend (buyer) this would not constitute a taxable boot as the money is not guaranteed to the buyer. 

I have a friend who is under contract on a commercial property and him and I were discussing his 1031 situation and I thought I would get an opinion from the experts in this forum. 

Property Purchase : $4.0M 
1031 Exchange Money: $1.05M

He has loan approval at 25% down for the commercial property and he will be pretty close to being completely wiped out with attorney fees and other allowed 1031 expenses. 

There are some issues that came up with the property inspection and it needs a new roof, new commercial rtus, and repaving the parking lot. The total credit he is asking the seller for is 300K. He is wondering if he should take the 300k as a price reduction (leading to boot from 1031 as he does not want to go higher than 25% down payment) or if he can avoid boot by keeping the price the same and take the 300k in a capex escrow account with the title company to be used for repairs over the next year (title company and bank are ok with this). His QI is telling him the escrow would also be considered money received at closing but falls in a gray area if audited. The seller doesn't want to do the fixes prior to closing but is ok with the 300k credit. 

Any insights would be appreciated or any other ways to utilize the 300k in credits.