I appreciate the opinions. My tenant has moved out--the judge told her she had to be out by the end of the March or she would be evicted. He seemed very sympathetic to my case, especially when I showed him photographs of damage to the outside of the house. She tried to press the illegal entry' issue but the judge would have none of it.
Now, my unit is absolutely filthy and every stitch of carpet will have to be removed because it is way beyond cleaning. She had removed drapery and pulled bracklets out of the wall leaving a huge hole above the window. The trim on a beautiful bevelled glass oak door (antique) is torn off and the towel bar on the bathroom is bent. The refrigerator was so toally disgusting with dried food it took hours to clean.
I am considering taking her to small claims court because she has a steady job and I think considering the damage she has done, should compensate me financially for the lost rent and the hours of time and labor and materials it will take to get the apartment back to the condition it was in when she rented it.
My question is: I purchased the house in Oct 2006 and the previous owners had thoroughly cleaned and repainted it before putting it on the market. The carpeting was older, but a very good quality wool, and in fine condition. I have heard that because it was older than 7 years, I am not able to charge her for the damage. Anyone know the rule on this? My state is Michigan.