Quote from @Sanjeev Advani:
Both Democrat and Republican presidential candidates have found common ground in the idea of using federally owned lands to address the U.S. housing shortage. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump have both floated plans to make housing more accessible by repurposing public lands for development. This bipartisan proposal responds to the urgent need for new housing, with estimates suggesting a shortage of up to 5.5 million units nationwide.
Legislation like the HOUSES Act, which has received bipartisan support, aims to unlock millions of new homes by using underutilized federal land. However, challenges remain, particularly with balancing environmental concerns and ensuring that new developments cater to lower-income families. While the proposal won’t solve housing issues in dense urban areas, it represents a step forward in the fight to make housing more affordable.
I agree with @Chris Seveney on this. Rethinking density limitations like building height, parking requirements, and ADU permitting would be more impactful.
High-dense urban environments should build up, and get rid of underutilized parking since public transit is easier in these environments.
Suburban areas should encourage ADU development and make it easy to turn underutilized parking in places like church lots into housing.