Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Anand Raghavan

Anand Raghavan has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Thank you for the counter point. One thing I didn't understand was your reference to one year - "nothing wrong with renting a small place with zero obligation after a year". What is the significance of the one year mark? 


With the situation I am in, my family is not likely to move out of the area for at least a few years. In the meanwhile, barring any windfalls, I may not have many other good job prospects within a reasonable radius (and I am quite happy with my job). 

As of today I am not a real estate investor. Circumstances are putting me in a position where I have to work hours away from where my primary residence will be (we will be moving shortly). This means I have to spend a few days every week in City B, while my family & home will be in City A. 

My first thought was to just rent a small condo or somesuch in City B. I then realized that this city offers cheap real estate, and that I might as well get a mortgage and buy an inexpensive condo, thereby getting some equity back for the money I'd be throwing away. 

As I read more, it occurred to me that a second strategy might be to buy a small multi-family property if I can find one (say 2-3 units) and rent out all but one - which I'd occupy. My thinking is that while a multi-family property (that is in a relatively in-demand rental area) is going to be more basic than where I'd like, it's only a few weeknights - and perhaps the out-of-pocket monthly cost would be lower for me than just buying the condo. In either case I'd get a mortgage. Please set me straight if I'm thinking wrongly.

Now, one major question that comes up is that of the mortgage. I have read that one may avail of a low-down FHA loan for owner occupied investment properties. Is this limited to the house being a primary residence for the owner? Is there a distinction made for a secondary residence - as it will be in my case? If not, is there an alternative mortgage option that is attractive (in terms of down payment, or interest rate) for such a scenario? I appreciate any pointers, as I have zero experience.