Originally posted by @Justin B.:
How are you calculating that 1% return? Are you getting 1% return on the units you are not living in? If so, I think you are calculating it incorrectly. "House Hacking" is a different animal from a traditional investment when it comes to calculating "return". For example, if you have a Quad and live in one and rent each for $1,000/month (making $3k the revenue) and your expenses are $2,980/month, you are NOT making $20/month, you are making $1,020/month. This is because you don't have a mortgage (or rent). Because that's $1,000/month you aren't spending to live elsewhere. In fact, it's probably more because your insurance/taxes, etc are all included in the quad. I do not live in any of my investments, which means I have a mortgage on my primary home. I don't factor my own mortgage into those numbers. You have to kind of take the same approach. If you can live "rent free" and make 1% return on the remaining units, that sounds like a great deal.
On the flip side, if your expenses on that property are $3,980, I think it's a "bad" deal and I wouldn't do it.
Make sense?
Hey Justin,
I am calculating that 1% return based on rental income MINUS all expenses (mortgage, capex, etc etc).
I am on the flip side. The expenses on the property are just a bit lower than the rental income.
In your example, I am paying $1000 "rent" to myself to cover the total expenses on the property. So you'd interpret this as a "bad" deal, whereas I am trying to reason a way to make it into a "good" deal because right now, I am currently renting.
Originally posted by @Brent Coombs:
@Alex W., if having a mortgage with expenses can be cheaper than what you'd otherwise have to pay in rent ANYWAY - why wouldn't you buy? I hope your question was largely rhetorical? Cheers.
No, my current rent is considerably lower than a mortgage+expenses. If my rent was astronomical and more than a mortgage, I would definitely buy.
Perhaps I am blurring the lines between an investment and a primary residence?
The situation I am in now is that I am paying rent. However, I want to purchase a multifamily, so that I can live in 1 and rent out the others.
The numbers work out so that my COC ROI is 1% (accounting for all mortage, expenses, etc).
I am counting my OWN money into that 1%, because someday, I will move out, and have someone else take my place, so that 1% stays the same.
On this hypothetical deal, I am now paying rent to myself, and not to someone else.
1% COC ROI is not good. But I am trying to justify it because I would like to purchase property for myself to live in and manage and gain some experience.
Does that make sense?