Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Try Pro Features for Free
Start your 7 day free trial. Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties.
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: Alex Grier

Alex Grier has started 3 posts and replied 8 times.

I understand the potential expense but it would also make the units more appealing as well as add some value. Plus for the existing tenants I could rationalize a rent increase.

Hey guys I'm running the numbers on a new triplex I put in an offer on the other day and they currently have oil heat which I'd be responsible for paying for. Based on the numbers I have it costs about 2400 a year or 200 a month. I'd like to pocket the 200 a month by passing the cost on to the tenants. However, I want to do a little giving to get so to say. I'd like to install the mitsubishi hyper heat unit(s). I'm curious, has anyone done any mini splits with these and if so can you have the mini splits individually metered per unit? Or is my best bet to install an individual unit for each floor? 

Originally posted by @Jon Holdman:

That only makes matters worse. The appraiser will try to find something to compare it to.  They may have to go further back in time or further away.  But they're unlikely to switch to the income method because that often gives very different answers.  May depend somewhat on the lender, too.

 Gotcha, as a new investor I don't entirely understand the mechanics. However, would you say that appraisers primarily use the comparison model for residential and only tend to gravitate towards the income model for commercial? 

Originally posted by @Jon Holdman:

Comparables is the most common method.  Usually when someone is wanting to use the income method they're trying to get a higher value than the comps justify.  

What if there are truly no recent comps though? Multi-family properties that actually have separate units with living areas, kitchens, etc. surely can't be compared to other sf or town homes just because they have the same number of rooms? I don't currently have access to the MLS as I'm not yet a licensed realtor. However, if I search a listing site for recently sold homes in the area that I'm looking at a potential multi-family property I typically can't find any comps.

Guy's I'm looking to get some more information on how 1-4 unit multi-family properties are appraised. The primary reason I'm asking is because for my buy and hold strategy I'd like use hard money loans to buy distressed properties, rehab them, and refinance based on the ARV to a conventional mortgage. Based on all the information I've pulled appraisers will typically use a sales comparison or an income approach.

For the 1-4 unit non commercial properties will appraisers typically use the income approach? 

Is there a finite amount of time that the units must be rented for before an appraiser can use an income approach based on the net operating income of my property? Example: If I rehab a property and have it filled with tenants in 6 months and go to refinance my loan in month 7 will an appraiser still use the income approach even though my property has been rented for such a short period of time? 

Thanks for any information you guy's can offer! 

Post: Flipping as a Realtor or Investor

Alex GrierPosted
  • Bear, DE
  • Posts 8
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Brandon Hall:
Originally posted by @Stuart Birdsong:

@Brandon Hall

As a flipper, if your holding period is less than a year are you taxed as if it is Short term capital gains or as standard income?

Good question. A flip will always be taxed as ordinary income, regardless of how long you hold it. Some people say "hold for 12 months then sell" but they are wrong. The question always revolves around the intent of the transaction. Sure, if you hold longer you can better substantiate "investment" intent, but just remember it's intent that matters.

That said, if you flip a property but are able to demonstrate investment intent and have a hold period less than 12 months, it will be subject to capital gain tax rather than ordinary income. 

 Thanks Brandon both of your answers helped me! I was confusing capital gains with standard income tax.

Post: Flipping as a Realtor or Investor

Alex GrierPosted
  • Bear, DE
  • Posts 8
  • Votes 0
Originally posted by @Brandon Hall:

@Alex Grier being a realtor will have no tax affect on your flipping business. They are two completely separate businesses. A doctor will get taxed the same on his flips as a realtor would.

I'm not sure what you mean by a 4% investor tax. Maybe this is something local to you?

You should speak with a real estate savvy CPA, especially if you are factoring in taxes into your decision making.

Interesting I may be wrong about the 4% investors tax as it's been a while since I read this. However, I'll link below that if you are a real estate professional or you do a large volume of flips per year the IRS will tax you self employment tax on top of capital gains tax.

http://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/2014/07/10/paying-taxes-fix-flip-properties/

Post: Flipping as a Realtor or Investor

Alex GrierPosted
  • Bear, DE
  • Posts 8
  • Votes 0

Guy's I'm in class currently to get my realtors license. However, I'm starting to have second thoughts on the benefits to this as an investor; specifically a flipper. The primary reasons I wanted my license was to get access to our local mls and to avoid seller commissions. However, from what I understand you have to be part of a brokerage to get access to the mls and to sell a house. After the fees and due diligence of continued education it doesn't seem worth it and I'll explain why I have this opinion.

As a real estate professional I'm subject to a 15% self employment tax on any profits vs the 4% investors tax. After this is said and done the benefits I gain of avoiding seller commission fees is almost wiped out depending on the price of the house and the margins. Additionally, I'll be the one at the open houses and finding the leads onstead of another realtor. Please share your opinions and if there are any other benefits to investing as a licensed realtor.