Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x
All Forum Categories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

All Forum Posts by: N/A N/A

N/A N/A has started 1 posts and replied 2 times.

Thanks for your help. After seeing your reply, it led me to do a little bit of more research. You pointed me in the right direction.

I Googled the City's Building Department, after speaking with a Senior Builder he gave me insight as to the whole process on the obtaining my CO (certificate of occupancy) for the non-permitted 2 units. First off, contact the City's Planning Dept, provide them with the properties address, see how the property is zoned. One crucial piece of information the Planning Dept provided me with is that if the buildings are located anywhere within the property lot's "setbacks" (specific square footage adjacent to the property line), the city would not allow the buildings to be permitted, and could even order them to be tore down. Right then and there, that could be a deal buster. Now, if the two units were built outside the properties "setbacks", that would be ok.

Secondly, The Building Depts process is first to submit a floor plan of the units, anyone with drafting skills would be able to complete one. Second of which, have an inspector view the property, in order to deem it safe. Fee for 2 hrs of work, $250. The city will also impose a building fee, even though the units had already been built before you acquired the property, they'd have to be paid in order to have the units permitted. The fees are public information which I found on the Building Depts website, easily you calculate how much square footage the buildings are and you pay the building fee, for my case, the two units come up shy of 1000 square feet - totally my building fee to approximately $10,000!

All in all, the expense to have a building permitted would cost approximately $10,000 - $12,000. Good negotiating bit of information to present to the seller, maybe ask for a credit.

It's always best to do as much research on a situation like this where it could end up costing you thousands of dollars out of pocket. It's always good to ask for advice and have someone point you in the right direction. Thanks!

I'm looking to buy my first piece of investment property out here in California. I've come across a Triplex selling at a deep discount. I've talked to the listing agent as to why it's selling so cheap, it's because the back 2 units, Studios, were built around 1970, and the owner at that time did not get permits for the addition to the property.

Would there be problems arising in the future for me after becoming the owner on this property without it's building permits?

Would I be able to get the back 2 units permitted after buying it through the city?

Thanks