Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$39.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted about 8 years ago

Real Estate Investors: Greedy Profiteers or Good Samaritans?

Normal 1471390824 Good Real Estate Investor Profit Gentrification

I am proud to be a real estate investor but in the many years I have been in this business, I have heard the most inaccurate, absurd, as well as offensive things about real estate investors. Things like: we are greedy profiteers, we are slumlords, and probably the most outrageous that was told to one of my real estate friends by his banker – “we are in an evil business”. Imagine that. Who would say something like this, except someone who doesn’t truly understand what we do as real estate investors?

I want to set the record straight so when you hear things like this you can respond with the facts and be proud to call yourself a real estate investor. Real estate investors add more value to a distressed community than anyone else. I can also argue that real estate investors maintain and improve the value of vibrant communities as well. This may sound bold, but it’s absolutely true. Whether you wholesale, flip, or own rental properties, you are adding tremendous value to the community by taking risks others won’t. And guess what? You should make money doing it! If there were no incentive, and no one willing to put their time and money at risk, entire communities would deteriorate.

When you drive through a neighborhood and see that awful house on the street (you know the one I am talking about), the one with 3 foot tall weeds, 15 newspapers in the yard, mail covering the front porch, broken windows with stray animals going in and out, etc., you see opportunity. The neighbors see a bad situation that won’t go away fast enough because, from their perspective, no one cares enough to do anything about it.

Even worse is when the city takes action and boards up the house, creating a false impression that this is a bad neighborhood. Think about this for a minute. If you saw 2 houses like this on the same street, what would you think? How about 3 on the same street? I have seen this many times. When this happens, the value of the neighborhood can completely erode (along with the property tax revenue, affecting schools, hospitals, and even essential services like police and fire). There is less desirability for a homebuyer to purchase a home in a neighborhood with 3 boarded up houses on the street. Safety becomes the #1 concern in these situations and fear will make buyers look elsewhere.

I once had a tenant from Detroit who retired to Dallas because he had family here. I remember asking him what it was like living in Detroit. He said he was scared all the time as he lived in the inner city and most of the houses on his street were vacant. Moving here for him was a blessing as he said he escaped the cold weather as well as a dangerous neighborhood. This happened because no investors were willing to take on the risk where he lived.

When a real estate investor finally steps in to improve a property the value of the property increases, the tax assessed value increases, the neighborhood feels safer and more desirable, and families want to live there. For you to take on this level of responsibility, you need to be rewarded financially and need to feel great about what you are doing. So when you hear anything negative about real estate investors, remember to counter back with what I mentioned, in a way that is confident, courteous, and professional, because no one is doing more for distressed communities than real estate investors.



Comments (2)

  1. Hi Dacia, first of all thanks for all you are doing in the social services arena. It takes a big heart and a lot of patience to do what you do. Also, thanks for the comments on my post. I agree with your comments about improving properties for being on par with the neighborhood, although the market itself will inevitably dictate what happens. In my opinion you can absolutely maintain your values and still have success investing in real estate. Just focus on the areas of town where you believe you can add the most value and have an impact.


  2. Having lived in NYC for the past 17 years and worked in nonprofit social services with many folks battling housing insecurity, this is something I'm thinking about a lot as I plan my real estate investments. I'm looking into investing in the Hudson Valley, not in NYC. I agree with everything you've laid out here, and the BP ethos seems to be to look for good deals without being greedy. To me, this means improving properties so they are on par with the best properties in the neighborhood, not upscaling a property in a neighborhood that might later attract tenants with more money to throw at rent. I hope I'm not being too precious about my concerns around the negative impacts of gentrification, but I'm trying to figure out how to invest well and stay in line with my values.