Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted almost 12 years ago

Is There A Growing Single-Family Rental "Hedge Fund" Crisis? Maybe...

How much money are different hedge funds pouring into the single-family residential real estate market today?  Why are they buying up so many properties and what are they doing with them?  These are two big questions for every day real estate investors who are worried about their ability to make a living in their markets.  Given that real estate investors themselves are spending $9 billion a year as estimated by the BiggerPockets/Memphis Invest Investor Survey from the fall of 2012, I would say investors and the media may be asking the wrong questions.  The right questions revolve around what the renters being served by this growing asset class are looking for and what are their plans for the future?  Without knowing the answers to these questions, we could all be feeding into a single-family renter crisis in the futre.


How Big Can The Residential Rental Market Grow?


So the estimates on the size and amount of money that hedge funds are willing to grow and spend acquiring and holding properties varies.  I recently heard that all of the known funds combined would be well over $30 billion in announced capital that they expect to deploy.  For the moment, I’m not interested in calculating the exact number of houses that will purchase and where those properties might be.  I am much more interested in combining that number with the expected $10 billion plus that small companies and individual investors will buy this year.  Knowing that only a fraction of those, but still a significant number, will remain as rentals, there is a size-able investment being made by every one involved in converting single-family homes into rentals. During one five year period, 2005 to 2010, the total U.S. number of single-family housing units grew by 4 percent.  


Obviously housing was down and many economists say that housing starts have fallen so far behind population growth that it will take years to fully recover.  I think I will save that point for a question at the end as well.  For now, let’s look at what has happened with single-family homes converting from home ownership to rental. During the same five year period from 2005 to 2010, the share of single-family homes that converted from home ownership to rental grew by 21 percent.  Clearly the number of homes being built did not keep up with rental demand which means that over 3 million homes that were built originally to be occupied by a home owner have since converted to rentals.  This has led to single-family homes making up 52 percent of the rental units in America today.  


Considering that multi-family building often house many more occupants, single-family renters still only make up 27 percent of the total renter number, but this is a growing number and could have a significant impact on the future of housing.  After all, this is the portion of the population that many economists say the U.S. economy is counting on purchasing a significant number of homes in the next few years as they are expected to transition back to home owners.  So here is the question...Will they?


What Is On The Minds Of Single-Family Renters?


Recently, our company wanted to undertake a survey and develop an on-going study to find out what is on the minds of single-family renters.  We could have taken on the survey ourselves and simply surveyed the renters of the single-family homes that we have under management in Tennessee and Texas.  That seemed like a small and obviously biased way to go about a survey.  Instead, we contracted with ORC International, Opinion Research Corporation, one of the most respected Caravan survey companies in the world and an expert at conducting a Caravan phone survey.  What transpired and eventually was published just last week is the National Survey of Renters.  


We wanted them to design a survey that reached both landline and cell phone recipients and asked them to self-identify first as a renter and second to distinguish as single-family home or a multi-family unit renter.  Once the respondents had been classified, ORC proceeded to ask questions that were designed to help us start figuring out what renters were looking for and what were their future plans. What came out was a surprising picture.  Single-family renters tend to place a higher value on safety, cleanliness and friendliness of the area as well as schools and less on access to parks, recreation and community centers.  They also tend to be more affluent than multi-family renters and are more apt to have children.  The data showed that single-family home renters tend to be a little older.  I think most of that data could have been guessed by many experienced investors.  But there were some surprises. Some 84 percent of the single-family renters gave their property management company or landlord good to exceptional ratings.  Only 5 percent rated their property management as poor.  Multi-family renters were slightly less satisfied with their rental management and quite a few rated the management as poor.  


Even though single-family renters are satisfied with property management, nearly 60 percent plan to move within the next two years.  That seems fairly in line with what many believe is a transient community with high turnover rates.  However, 26 percent planned to stay longer than 5 years in their current location.  With these mixed messages we started to question what the data was showing us and  that brought us to the real reason for conducting the survey and study in the first place.


What are the Future Plans of Single-Family Renters?


There has been a common theme in recent months that if it were only easier to obtain financing, more single-family renters would buy houses.  I think I agree with that notion in principle.  I know I agree with the idea that if there were an ease of lending to promote more purchases by real estate investors, that group would absolutely buy more homes.  The past investor survey showed as much.  But, we were surprised to look at one narrow group in the survey and read their responses.  


The survey showed that only 52 percent of renters, including 60 percent of single-family renters plan on becoming home owners in the next five years. When they were asked why they were not planning to buy a home in the next five years, only 29 percent said it was due to difficulties obtaining a loan.  That response completely turns the notion of making credit more accessible will spur single-family renters to become home buyers on its head.  Will it lead to more home sales?  Absolutely.  We saw that in 2009-2012 with the home buyers credit.  Anytime steps are taken to entice home sales, a certain uptick in activity can be measured.  But  the uptick is always fleeting and only a response to the program.  What about when there is no program?   Interest rates continue to be at all time lows so why are more renters not coming forward or planning on coming forward to buy a home? Fully 75 percent of single-family renters in the survey reported that they either enjoy renting or simply have no desire to own a home.  Given the turmoil of the past few years does anyone find that hard to believe?   


The ranks of single-family home renters have undoubtedly grown as more and more families have lost their homes to financial hardship and foreclosures.  Yet, these families have grown accustomed to the benefits of living in a neighborhood.  They would like to maintain a semblance of normalcy.  And, looking back, they have no desire to go through the grind of becoming a home owner again.


More Questions...More Answers?


So back to some of the earlier questions.  What do you think this means?  Who is really in a better situation right now...the large fund investor or the small individual investor?  If you are buying for long-term buy and hold, I personally like the position of the individual investor if only for their ability to keep a closer and more focused eye on the management and performance of each property.  The funds will be just fine and most will come out either packaging their portfolios into REITs or selling them to other investment groups looking for a cash flow package.  


But, the fact that many are not able to figure out the management aspect of owning such a large portfolio and considering that many funds have failed to come to grips with the fact that owning single-family rentals cannot be simply boiled down to an algorithmic formula for success, leads me to believe that not knowing what renters want and not providing good management could lead to some funds holding onto properties without a clear exit strategy.  You cannot simply "expect" and "prepare" for higher costs and think that somehow a new calculation is going to make a portfolio perform better.  It may help a fund to hit a bottom line return, which is really where their concern lies.  I do not blame them for a minute.  They are telling people exactly why they are doing this.  But the properties themselves and the experience of the renter will be much lower than the average every day investor who is keeping a close watch on his or her portfolio and the management piece of the equation. 


What about multi-family building?  Many areas of the country are experiencing growth in this category while also seeing a huge transfer of single-family homes from owners to renters.  Can both exist and grow at the same time?  And what do you make of the fact that we are still millions of homes behind what economists tell us we should be building to keep up with population growth and demand?  I believe that we are close to hitting a tipping point where demand for rental property and demand for ownership property will not meet the supply on the streets.  For some communities that is going to mean a new set of misery. The next five years are going to be very telling for all of us as investors.  There will absolutely be a continued transfer of property wealth.  For all of us, watching renter sentiment and providing what renters are asking for could have a tremendous pay off.  Premier Property Management will continue to run this twice a year survey to maybe stay in front of the next trend and hopefully provide a few answers along the way. 


sources used to compile the data in this post: 

2010 U.S. Census Data 

Secrets of Single Family Rentals 

SFR: Birth of a Category 

WSJ: Report: Single-Family Rental Demand Is Outstripping Supply 


Photo: 


Comments (12)

  1. "For all of us, watching renter sentiment and providing what renters are asking for could have a tremendous pay off." Great article, Chris. I really like the "angle" that you have approached on this issue as I have tried to dissect and analyze the rental market recently ad nauseum. I've lived my life in SFR's in great neighborhoods but had stints during the college years in sprawling multi-family complexes and I can say I understand where the data are coming from. The various aspects and requirements that renters look for within the different classes ring true and I believe the more the investor can fulfill said characteristics, the better his/her bottom-line. In RE, understanding the customer seems to be just as important as understanding the location/market. I plan to capitalize on this in the current niche product I wish to develop and offer soon. ~Clayton


    1. Clayton - Thanks for the input and taking time to share it. You really nailed one critical piece that came from the survey and that is that investors need to pay attention to what the demand is from renters in their area. Affordability is important...but it is further down the line than many think. What is most important is cleanliness, safety, customer service, care and reliability from the manager or landlord of the property. Pay attention and you can increase your return. Chris


  2. Jake - I don't think you are far off. I can tell you one thing i think will not happen. It will be reported that there are massive numbers of new buyers re-entering the market to buy homes in the next few years. however, what will not be reported is what percentage of home owners converted to renters and have chosen to not re-enter the market. Their decision to stay in the renter class will enable investors to continue to buy properties regardless of who is selling them and continue to provide a solution for renters. We'll see - Thanks for reading and commenting - I appreciate the input. Chris


  3. In my opinion, this will play out almost precisely as the subprime/MBS collapse did. The bubble in this case is not caused by artificially high demand, but instead, artificially low supply. In markets where private equity and the like are making large bets (CA, AZ, NV, FL, TX and GA for the most part), there will be a huge increase in prices due to this phenomenon, until one of two things happens: 1) The PE companies have placed all of their committed capital -or- 2) Enough discretionary sellers come to market to bring the market to supply/demand equilibrium. One of those two things will happen in the next 18 months in these markets, and then when the spinoff REITS or pension funds left holding the actual assets realize that the underwriting utilized to calculate their "safe" 5% Cap rates was "novice-like" at best, there will be a mass exodus out of the asset class. I'm not sure it will be Bear Stearns or Lehman, but it might be Countrywide or New Century. That's when you can start buying in these markets again. Again, just my opinion.


  4. A few things pop out at me but one leaves me wondering who is right and who is wrong. While i can't quote the study or source, it was only last year in which I heard that (CA only) had an oversupply of homes yet this blog quotes a study showing lack thereof. With population growth and all, I simply do not see an under-supply of homes. While we do have a very low inventory market, it is at least half way artificial and 100% manipulated, and as such, will find some victims in the path of the correction. Who those victims are and when it happens remains to be seen.


    1. Will - I agree with you and you kind of touch on one point that we all have to remember - real estate and its problems are all local. There are many communities around the country that have no idea what we are talking about when we discuss hedge funds. They have not heard from a hedge fund and really don't get all the fuss. We will see what happens with the supply side of the housing recovery. There is still a massive amount of property available and many, many more that have not been processed through either foreclosure or short-sale process in the areas that I operate. These are the same areas that hedge funds are starting to really pick up activity in right now. Thanks for reading and throwing out some comments. Chris


  5. Excellent research! I think hedge funds could be out of their league in SFR. Hedge funds that hold property will require local property management, as they don't usually like to get their hands dirty. A portfolio of SFRs is a lot more to manage than a portfolio of multi-family or commercial real estate. SFR is not an easily managed asset class. Maybe there is an opportunity here for savvy investors to expand their property management to offer it as a service to the hedge funds? We worked with a hedge fund a few years back, they were looking at buying large REO packages from banks, but the management part of the equation scared them away from the idea. Those that take the plunge now may be biting off more than they can chew. Will be interesting to see how it plays out.


    1. Dev - I wouldn't say they are out of their league on property management, but I do think many are finding it a big hurdle. The reality is that there are very very few property management companies that are set up to handle such large volume. They themselves do not have the staff or the experience to manage $150 million in sfr especially over multiple cities. I think the funds recognized that, but many decided to simply tweak their numbers to account for higher losses and then jumped right in. You were spot on with your comments about this being an opportunity for property management companies though. Thanks for reading and commenting. Chris


  6. Thank You Chris Clothier, for all the hard work, this is an excellent read. I believe a quote from your article is an indicator for society. You said "Fully 75 percent of single-family renters in the survey reported that they either enjoy renting or simply have no desire to own a home. Given the turmoil of the past few years does anyone find that hard to believe?" This statement reveals a major trend in our culture. I'm referring to more of a generational transition. My grandparents owned their own home, didn't believe in debt and family usually lived close by. With significant developments in technology and infrastructure, the term "close" has developed a whole new meaning. My generation saw the first man on the moon, watched air travel become commonplace and survived “Y2K”. Our kids experienced the introduction of the PC, the cell phone and watched the internet explode. Now it seems every 6th grader can defrage the family laptop, has a profile on Facebook and walks around texting and “tweeting” on their own smart phone. I guess that’s the long way of saying that, over time, lifestyles and perspectives are changing. People, for their own reasons either want to be, or need to be, more mobile than previous generations. As you mentioned, much of today’s workforce has experienced economic peaks and valleys. When circumstances necessitate a move, home ownership creates obligations not easily, nor conveniently severed. It seems that, consciously or unconsciously, more and more people are choosing to keep their options open. Respectfully,


    1. Jeff - Thanks for reading the article. I agree with you on the next steps of home renters. The one fact that is not really being taken into account - and to be fair there had never been a survey or study undertaken to find out - is that many people simply do not want to own again. Chris


  7. Hey Al - You are correct. That just happens to be the way they identified their desires. We are going to run the random survey again in the early part of the second quarter t get a second set of data. Two surveys should start building a picture for us and we'll see if the data correlates. ON your point about inner city neighborhoods, I can tell you that my own experiences have pointed not only to friendly and safe but also services. So many inner city dwellers are in a vicious cycle where they cannot escape and instead of bringing essential services - and I mean simple services like convenience stores, gas stations, grocery stores - too many are bringing charitable efforts which are needed but do not sustain. I'd like to get a copy of your new book. Send me the name of it and I will grab a copy and read it. All the best to you - Chris


  8. Chris Clothier, This is some really nice work you did. Ned Carey hipped me to it. Thanks Ned. I had to chew on the data some, but what jumped out at me were the apt stats. In your important factors table, you showed 98% apt dwellers wanted safe neighborhoods but only 48% of them wanted friendly neighborhoods. Wow, want a breakdown in understanding those renters have! The SFH renters have it right (98% value safety and 94% value friendliness). You've proved the point of my new book, landlord in lower income inner city areas are going to need to step up their neighborhood involvement to prevent/reverse the growing good neighbor gap. Am I reading your data correctly? Or am I looking through a self-serving lens? (please forgive any typos)