Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted over 9 years ago

Antonio Loios, GetEasy Limited and their inactivity in Portugal

On November 14th, the Bank of Portugal issued a statement that raises several facts, the usefulness of which remains a mystery. The statement says, among other things, that the company GetEasy Limited and Mister Antonio Loios are not entitled to operate in Portugal.


That’s perfectly fine. But what, exactly, is the use of such an announcement, since neither GetEasy Limited, nor Mister Antonio Loios have any business dealings in Portugal? This declaration can simply not be enforced. Indeed, Mister Loios does not have the license which would allow him to undertake a financial activity in Portugal. Neither does he have one to operate in Japan or Guatemala for that matter. Does this call for those countries’ central banks to issue a similar statement?


AS for GetEasy Limited, the company is registered in Macao and is in no way under Portuguese jurisdiction. Why, then, formulate such an announcement related to a foreign company that isn’t active in the country in question?


These questions will probably remain unanswered for some time. Meanwhile, the individuals behind this publication should introspect and realize that such reckless actions, even though legally sterile, cause considerable damage to the companies subjected to them.


Furthermore, the interested parties haven’t even been notified of this publication, nor have they been given the floor to express themselves on the question of a commercial activity (or lack thereof) in Portugal.


Comments