

Why I've Had No Vacancies in Over Ten Years
When calculating returns and “crunching the numbers” for potential investment properties, conventional wisdom suggests that one figures in a loss of income due to vacancy. This figure is typically in the range of 7-10%, but differs depending on the local economy. It is wise to be prepared for unexpected repairs and vacancies, but wouldn’t it be nice to have no vacancies? Wouldn’t it be nice to turn an expected loss of income into profit?
Obtaining fully occupied rentals starts with having a good product in an area that is desirable. Potential tenants want a clean, updated home in a safe location that is priced in line with current market rates.
My investment properties are all located in Nashville, TN. It is where I live, and it is the market that I know. Nashville has had steady population growth that is projected to continue for years to come. That is the number one factor that creates a pool of potential tenants to choose from. I wouldn’t invest in an area that isn’t growing.
My experience as a landlord has been very positive, and I believe that is a direct result of selecting ideal tenants. Whenever I post a Craigslist ad with several photos and a detailed description of the property I have available for rent, I quickly get numerous inquiries that lead to applications. I do background checks and verify the income of the applicants. I always check with previous landlords to see if there were any late payments or damages to their property. The next step is meeting the tenants at the property to sign the lease and conducting a property condition walkthrough. Acquiring quality, responsible tenants is an achievement in itself, but isn’t the end game. Keeping quality tenants is what’s important.
All interactions with tenants need to be done in a prompt, polite, and professional manner. Many investors hire a property manager or management company to handle all tenant involvements, while some self-manage their own properties. Wise investors will check in with their tenants to make sure that the property manager is treating them fairly. I manage my rental properties myself and save the typical management fee of 8-10% of gross rents. Understandably, some investors may not have the time or desire to self-manage their properties, but tenants are paying the rent, not the management company. Tenants want to feel that they are valued as individuals and not just nameless “renters”. Repair requests and maintenance issues need to be respectfully addressed as quickly as possible. This is the duty and responsibility of management.
By managing my own properties and limiting vacancies, I save between 15-20% of gross rents. When computed annually for five properties that have an average rent of $1000 per month, it ends up being a savings of $9,000-$12,000 a year. Double that number if figuring for ten properties, and it becomes clear that these savings equal a major boost in income and investment return rates.
How have I had no vacancies in my rental properties for over a combined ten years? There isn’t a one word answer, but it isn’t complicated, either. Tenants are customers, and they can take their business elsewhere. If I provide a quality product and professional service, they won’t want to. By keeping high standards for my properties, I set an attitude that the tenants pick up on. I want my tenants to call me when there is a plumbing leak, because I want to have it fixed before the problem gets worse. Every few months I send a small handwritten note to my tenants thanking them for paying their rent on time and in full every month. Each year I send a Christmas card and gift card to Kroger. And I never forget, buildings don’t pay the rent, people do.
Comments (7)
Anne Wallace, about 9 years ago
Solea equinus rectus
Roy N., about 10 years ago
Frank Kocher, about 10 years ago
Great point Frank. I don't think opportunity cost is considered as much as it should be. I know I forget about it at times. For some individuals, real estate investing is just a part time job and they are content to keep it that way. For others, like myself, real estate is their primary income, and they are looking for ways to maximize profit and gain any advantage possible. And there is a third group that is doing it part time, but want to transition into real estate investing as a career. In my opinion, by lowering vacancies and self-managing, this group can get much closer to their goals more quickly, although the "regular job" income comparison should definitely be taken into consideration!
Jeff Miller, about 10 years ago
Frank Kocher, about 10 years ago
Thanks for the comment Kurt. Perhaps I could get higher rents, but that would increase the chances of vacancies. I think we agree on that. Maybe I could raise rents significantly and keep my tenants or even get better ones. There is no way to know until it is tried. As investors, we want to reach the optimal point where we are maximizing rental rates without the threat of losing good tenants. The longer I am a property manager, the more I see the value in having quality, dependable tenants who not only pay their rent on time every time, but also take good care of my property. I frequently check Craigslist, and my properties are in line with competing rental rates.
If Cheerios raised their price to $7 a box, I will start buying Raisin Bran for $3 a box. Because I think of my tenants as customers, I don't want to lose the good ones to a competing rental house. If I raise the price of my product too much, the customer will simply buy another product. I have raised rental rates incrementally at the times of lease renewal, (between $25 and $100 a month increase) and the tenants have always stayed. Maybe I could be getting more, but I don't want to push it. Maybe I am giving a bit of a "quality tenant discount", but it is worth it to me!
Jeff Miller, about 10 years ago
The traditional view of little to no vacancies is a red flag that the rent is too low. Certainly if you're happy with the return keep rents where they are, however if you explore higher rents you can push the vacancies up to 5%, which usually pays for itself in the rent increase. No right or wrong way, but that is some manage for some but low vacancy, to test the market.
Kurt K., about 10 years ago