Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted over 15 years ago

Agent Lays the SmackDown on the IRS

Many of you have heard about how the IRS has been targeting Real Estate Agents, and challenging the status of a "real estate professional" for an Agent.

To give you a brief background without getting into the details - a "Real Estate Professional" is someone who "materially participates" in their real estate activity. As a result, they are able to deduct real estate losses from other income that is not related to real estate.

The IRS had been challenging the "real estate professional" status for agents - stating that Brokers qualify, but Agents do not. And they were winning...

The great news is that a Real Estate Agent just won in tax court! Read the case for yourself!

The IRS tried to argue that the taxpayer needs to be a “Broker” not a just an “Agent” to meet the 750 hour per year material participation test. The Tax Court said: “The Court concludes that Congress is presumed to have defined the term “brokerage” in its common or ordinary meaning. The Court also stated that for purposes of section 469, the “business” of a real estate broker includes, but is not limited to: (1) Selling, exchanging, purchasing, renting, or leasing real property” and therefore, an “agent” is the same as a “broker” for purposes of this test.”

Yippy!

 


Comments (4)

  1. Happy to share Jim! Thanks for stopping by!


  2. Great info! Thanks for letting us all know about it.


  3. Thanks Josh! It is really important, and I'm surprised I haven't seen more info about it. I kinda had to dig around to find this document. Maybe it's still pretty new :)


  4. That's a very important legal decision, Niman. Thanks for sharing it. I wasn't even aware that this was going on.