Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get Full Access
Succeed in real estate investing with proven toolkits that have helped thousands of aspiring and existing investors achieve financial freedom.
$0 TODAY
$32.50/month, billed annually after your 7-day trial.
Cancel anytime
Find the right properties and ace your analysis
Market Finder with key investor metrics for all US markets, plus a list of recommended markets.
Deal Finder with investor-focused filters and notifications for new properties
Unlimited access to 9+ rental analysis calculators and rent estimator tools
Off-market deal finding software from Invelo ($638 value)
Supercharge your network
Pro profile badge
Pro exclusive community forums and threads
Build your landlord command center
All-in-one property management software from RentRedi ($240 value)
Portfolio monitoring and accounting from Stessa
Lawyer-approved lease agreement packages for all 50-states ($4,950 value) *annual subscribers only
Shortcut the learning curve
Live Q&A sessions with experts
Webinar replay archive
50% off investing courses ($290 value)
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted 6 months ago

What a new Colorado bill means for affordable housing

The recent passing of a bill HB24-1007 by the Colorado House of Representatives marks a significant stride in the ongoing battle to make housing more affordable. The legislation, aimed at addressing the unnecessary limits put upon occupancy limits would prohibit local governments from limiting the number of people who can live together in a residence. Limits would be permitted if based on demonstrated health and safety standards, such as fire code regulations, wastewater and water quality standards, and international building code standards.

Occupancy limits typically cap the number of people that can live in a residence based on whether or not they are not related, even if the residence has more bedrooms than the occupancy limit standard.

Up until this point, different local governments would limit the number of 'unrelated persons' that could live in the same property. For example, that number was 5 persons in Denver, 3 persons in Fort Collins, and so on. So even in a 5 bedroom home in Fort Collins, technically only 3 unrelated persons could live in the same property. 

While this is more of a bandaid to combat affordable housing, it is a step in the right direction. 

This measure could open up new renting strategies for investors more lucrative. For example, furnished mid-term rentals to groups such as travel nurses or long term rent by the room. 

A property worth checking out is called PadSplit. In the PadSplit management model, a home could be divided up into more bedrooms creating more affordable housing for renters and higher returns for landlords. 

This is a good development overall. 








Comments