Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here
Pick markets, find deals, analyze and manage properties. Try BiggerPockets PRO.
x

Posted over 14 years ago

The Big Tax Increase Facing S Corporations


The important thing to realize is that the Obama Administration is keeping its promise about not raising taxes on businesses to pay for healthcare.  Rather it is closing existing tax loopholes that existed in an effort to force small businesses into paying $100 billion more in taxes over the next year.  But, this action is not a tax increase on business owners!

What is the government in DC doing now to punish business owners for having a business and employing others?

In HR 4213,( the House’s version of the new spending, physicians' reimbursement, extensions of expired tax breaks, etc…,) Congress is also creating a tax mess for small-business owners in the form of an $11 billion / year tax hike over the next 10 years.

The tax hit affects the owners of small S corporations in "professional service businesses"--doctors, lawyers, accountants, engineers, architects and so on.

The provision before Congress, however, doesn't target only those who are underpaying themselves (which the IRS can attack now, through audits) but all "disqualified S corporations."

What does disqualified S corporations mean? There are two tests, according to Forbes Magazine, either of which can be met to deem an S corp disqualified. First, an S corporation that is a partner in a partnership that is engaged in a professional service business if substantially all of the S corporation's activities are performed in connection with the partnership or any other S corporation that is engaged in a professional service business, if the principal asset of the business is the reputation and skill of three or fewer employees.

Does this sound like something that would affect Real Estate Investors who use an S-Corp for their business?

It is the second test that is the kick in the head for most small businesses. Forbes uses this example:  Think of a dentist's office, with one employee whose reputation and skill is a principal asset of the business--the dentist/owner. The office also employs two front desk/clerical workers and three dental assistants. So this office has six employees, but only one key employee. So the dentist would be hit by this new tax. (Even though he may have an investment in equipment, the principal asset of the business is still his reputation and skill.)

Imagine branding yourself in Real Estate as an expert on pre foreclosures or seller financing.  If you are using your name or business reputation and utilizing an S Corp for pass through revenue, you may be affected by this closing of tax loophole.

Note this new tax is imposed regardless of the dollars involved; it doesn't matter if, as an S corporation owner, you had $300,000 or $30,000 in nonwage profits--this tax will hit you.

Why is Congress raising taxes now on small-business owners? According to Forbes, It is to offset other items in this same bill that the House wants--not just the extension of tax breaks but spending such as the Build America Bonds provision, which provides $28 billion in highly subsidized bond authority to state and local governments (with Goldman Sachs getting millions in fees). If you didn't think you were bailing out California and New York, as well as the big banks, think again.

It has long been recognized that, just as with almost every provision in the tax code, there are folks who like to play fast and loose with the treatment of S corporation distributions. They take a very low salary and receive a good amount in distribution to avoid payroll tax. The current law seeks to prevent that abuse by requiring that an owner of an S corporation be paid "reasonable compensation."

But defining "reasonable" on a case-by-case basis has not been easy for the IRS and S corporation owners.   This bill has passed the house but has not yet passed the Senate. 

I strongly encourage readers who are concerned about this proposed new tax to contact their senators immediately--this $11 billion tax has gotten almost no publicity, and they need to hear from you directly.

About the Author:  Tom Bukacek is a real estate investor in Austin, TX, and Phoenix, AZ who focuses on pre foreclosures.  Tom is also the Marketing Director for the Entrepreneurs Incubator, a full service real estate investing marketing, systems, and mentoring company located in Austin, TX.  For more information on Tom, please visit http://www.entrepreneurs-incubator.com.

 


Comments (7)

  1. The key is finding out about these bills early and flooding DC with our faxes and phone calls of outrage. A good example is the Cap and Trade bill, which would've required a license to own a home. It's estimated the average family would've had to spend almost $7k to get into compliance. And you couldn't sell a home not in compliance. Would've been a disaster. But NAR stepped in and got that part removed. Josh- any chance BP could put together a Govt legislation watchdog group?


  2. Small businesses are dropping like flies around Austin. I can't remember a week that goes by when I don't hear about some small business I know and love no longer operating. What pisses you off about the whole thing is that our politicians are distracted by whatever bright, shiny object comes along each week. Healthcare, BP oil spill, etc. I agree that this stuff is all important, but it is FAR less important than people losing their jobs and businesses.


  3. I think we will see many small business operations go out of business before this gets turned around. Eventually something will have to be done to help small businesses, but I don't see much hope in the short run.


  4. How can we as Small Business Owners ban together and offer different options that make it a Win-Win? Is that possible?


  5. You're right Charles. This country has gotten through the tough economical times in the past by supporting small business. Now it seems this country wants to rebound with govt jobs only and punish the small business owner with taxes, healthcare, and ridiculous administrative burdens. And let's not forget the IRS hatchet always dangling over our heads.


  6. The government couldn't care less about small business or the people out of work right now. I never hear anything about it!


  7. There are a number of tax increases incorporated in the health law and the tax extender bill. The government just doesn't want to say it how it is. I have seen no evidence that the government is concerned about the economy or small business which has often helped economy grow after a recession.