data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/93efc/93efc5b02d883f6981ca16e88e11b9a02ceb5762" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/577a7/577a70879ceb0a84d17f89b38ac76bb3c846dce5" alt=""
Single Family Investment Into a 1031 exchange to a multi-unit building
About a year ago I decided it was time to sell my first and only single family rental that I purchased around 2011. My wife, whom is very supportive, was there when I purchased it. She is a bit more sentimental than I am, and advised against selling the first home we lived in. We had only lived there for about a year, and then purchased our current primary residence shortly after. I knew where I wanted to go with the proceeds of the sale, and I knew that selling the property to invest in others was the only option. In turn, I purchased a multi unit apartment building and it turned into a crazier experience than I imagined.
I could not perform a cash out refinance of this property as most people suggested because I had only purchased it through FHA, 3.5% down. If I had attempted to cash out refinance, I could only refinance 75% loan to value (LTV), which would have taken the majority of the equity I had, and I would have been left with little to invest. Enter a 1031 Exchange; the mind blowing idea.
I decided that the best move was to sell this property and move the equity through a 1031 exchange into my new multi unit building. I listed my property in July of 2017, and within 2 weeks, had multiple offers, and entered escrow. To say we had a 30-day escrow would be too good to be true story, so we didnt go that route, not by choice. After 3 different escrows, we close November of 2017.
During my search for an exchange property within the incredible short time that the IRS gives you to choose your next properties during their tax-free grace period, I came across a property I fell in love with. No kidding , I wanted this property, I needed this property, and how everyone tells you, don't let your emotions get involved. I did.
I knew not to let my emotions get the best of me, just as I sold my first home, but there was something special about this one.
The nitty "greedy":
The property was listed for 675k and all 4-units were renting at 1100 each. I wanted it at this price, and I would have offered asking price, if I didn't know better. I offer 625k. They come back at 660, I come up to 640, we settle at 655k.
Enter Escrow:
The property was listed "as-is", which means i could ask for any repairs. Even if i did, the property was owned by four owners, and any response took at least a week, if I was lucky. I did not bother asking for any repairs. I did a full inspection and I knew what I was getting into, which is obviously highly recommended.
Here's the fun part. The appraisal came back at 595k. 5-9-5-k! Keep in mind I was already set to purchase at 675k, and I saw this as an opportunity. I pushed the envelope and countered back down to 585k.
A week later, I got notification that the owners were pulling out, mainly for this reason : "We don't know why the appraisal came in so low..."etc etc "We would like to withdraw from this sale agreement especially since notifications had already been sent out to raise the rents $100 per unit on January 2018; We would consider 635k, but if not we will withdraw from this sale"
OK, maybe a ploy, but since I was already interested in this property at the list price, I'm very interested at an additional 400/m.
I accept at 635k, but with an additional 45 day escrow to accumulate the funds since i have to cover over appraisal. Of course, they countered, saying 630k and 15 day escrow. I accept, with some creative financing.
After crunching some ideas with my mortgage broker and realtor, my realtor agrees to diminish all of his commission, down to nearly zero in order for this deal to close (he does this due to the fact that I was about to refinance my primary to purchase a few more props through him).
We finally get to closing mid December with all docs requested, including the current tenants deposits and such.
After closing, I communicate with tenants that I am the new owner, and I am rolling over all previous communications, including maintaining deposits, current lease agreements, and more importantly, the raised rent increase per unit!
Each unit obliged, and each tenant was happy to move forward. It is now mid march, and each unit pays on time with the newly signed lease agreements. I have so far invested around 10k to fix some safety issues including the exterior stairs leading to the upstairs units, 4 electrical panel tune ups and pipe hydro-jetting. All in all, with updated windows and window frames, total renovation costs will be around 30k.
Comments (5)
Monthly rent should be 1% of the purchase price.
Purchase for $600,000 then the monthly rent income should be $6,000.
Your actual monthly income is $4,800 which means you would have to buy it for $480,000 to make it a good investment. Even if the rent increased to $1,500 per unit, your monthly income would be $6,000 which is still below your current purchase price.
That's just a rule of thumb but it's a good indication of how strong the purchase is.
Experienced investors will also tell you that about 50% of your monthly income should be set aside for repairs, vacancies, property management, and capital expenditures. If you set 50% aside and put 50% towards your mortgage, it doesn't leave any cash flow. You may be able to increase rent but that's not a guarantee. Purchase price should be based on current performance, not projections.
Nathan Gesner, almost 7 years ago
@Nathan G. Welp, I screwed the pooch on this one. Thank for your advise, and this 1% rule either doesn’t exist in California, or it’s a unicorn. I’ve been debating investing out of state, but your post has made me consider it more so.
Brandon Rodriguez, almost 7 years ago
Congratulations on the purchase, Brandon. However, I'm a little confused. The property only appraised for $595,000. Why in the world would you pay $40,000 above the appraised price? And why did you pay above appraised price and then sink more money into it for repairs? You are $70,000 over the appraised value which means you bought this property for more than 10% above asking price.
The 1% rule says you generally want rent to be 1% of purchase price but your getting around 0.7% of purchase price.
I assume your mortgage is probably around $2,200 which is almost 50% of the rent income. Taxes, insurance, repairs and capital expenditures will run you around $2,400 a month which leaves you zero for cash flow. I know this is probably accurate because you're already putting $30,000 into it for repairs which is equivalent to 50% of the monthly rent for over a year.
Maybe you can provide more information to change my mind but this doesn't look like a good deal to me. A "good" investment is usually purchased 20% below market, not 10% above.
Nathan Gesner, almost 7 years ago
Hi @Nathan G.
Thank you for your reply, and I completely agree with your concerns, but there are a few factors as to why I went through with this deal, even though it had to pay 35k above.
First and foremost, this was an exchange and I got really tight on my timeframe, but lets just assume that was not the case.
The average rent for each unit is below average. Rental site put each unit at max 1550 per unit, and currently they are at 1200. The appraisal came in very low, and detailed a few issues with the property that were minor that I have since repaired. I could have gotten away with only paying about 12k in reno work, however the windows were in bad shape and if water would get through I would be in more trouble later. The comps were of similar multi-units showed an average of 900/m.
All in all, I invested in an upcoming downtown area that has a strong rental community, blocks away from a University and a community college which lowered my cap ex, in regards to vacancy rates.
Trying to find that "good investment" in Southern California of 20% below market is extremely rare. My thoughts here were this: Sell the SFR, purchase a cash-flowing multi, BRRR the prop, then find the next deal so I could could take my time in order to find this "good" investment.
Please, any more feedback or questions, feel free to ask. Even if it makes this deal look like the worst one on the planet, I would love to see the thought process of successful investors.
Brandon Rodriguez, almost 7 years ago
You got me thinking of this 1% rule as well, so here's my thoughts with that.
After investing about 30k to the property, and lets say to completely rehab each unit one by one would be 10K per unit (1 BR 1 BA each) which would total to a $70k. Purchase price of 630K+70K brings us to 700k. Each unit at that point would rent at $1500, totaling 72K per year, bringing the 1% rule to 1.02%. I know its obviously better to have the property turning 1% intitially, and increasing rents after renovations, but is this a completely incorrect way of going by the 1% rule?
Brandon Rodriguez, almost 7 years ago