Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Real Estate Horror Stories
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 2 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
30
Votes
Stephanie Menard
30
Votes |
13
Posts

Expensive lesson by leaving one clause out of rental agreement

Stephanie Menard
Posted

I rented a furnished home in Las Vegas, NV, to a fully screened tenant.  I used the standard Nevada Residential Lease Agreement from the Greater Las Vegas Association of Realtors. I had to add an addendum for the home's contents in the agreement. I ended up evicting him because he continued to violate the no-pet rule.  Upon his moving out, I checked the outside cameras and noticed he was taking out all the contents of the home and putting them in a moving truck and his car. Over the phone (because I was on vacation), I called him and told him he needed to return everything or I would file grand larceny charges.  I gave him a deadline, but he failed to show up with all my items. I then filed a grand larceny police report.  

I had an inventory of the items along with the lease agreement. A detective told me they couldn't keep the case open because there wasn't a clause in the rental agreement that said: "All items are not to be removed from the home."  Because this clause wasn't in the lease agreement, they closed the case and told me to take it up civilly because they couldn't prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that he wasn't permitted to take everything in the house.  It's frustrating, but I wanted to pass along the message to ensure this phrase is in your leases if you have items on your property.  

  • Stephanie Menard
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    17,456
    Posts
    30,144
    Votes
    Russell Brazil
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Washington, D.C.
    30,144
    Votes |
    17,456
    Posts
    Russell Brazil
    • Real Estate Agent
    • Washington, D.C.
    ModeratorReplied

    That's just a lazy *** police officer. Go over their head to their commanding officer or the district attorney. Cops all the time do everything they can to not investigate crimes.

    business profile image
    District Invest Group
    5.0 stars
    44 Reviews

    Loading replies...