Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Insurance
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
2
Votes
Ken K
  • Pennsylvania
2
Votes |
15
Posts

Actual Cash Value estimate

Ken K
  • Pennsylvania
Posted

Might anybody venture an estimate on this? . . .

1) a 60 year old house in dated but reasonably good condition is purchased for 75K

2) the insurance agent's system determines that the correct replacement cost value for that square footage in that location is 190K

3) it's insured for 190K, but with Actual Cash Value coverage

What amount might be paid by the insurance company if it was a total loss shortly after it was purchased?

Any opinions would be much appreciated. Thanks.

Ken

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

114
Posts
40
Votes
Donald Stevens
  • Detroit, MI
40
Votes |
114
Posts
Donald Stevens
  • Detroit, MI
Replied

Thats a very good question without an easy answer. I can give you a generic one and hopefully that is helpful. Because every home has different features, building material quality, and age of materials, (maybe the kitchen was renovated 5 years ago) the value and depreciation can vary greatly.

The rule of thumb I've used for easy ACV calculation is if its a frame home depreciate by 1% per year and if its brick then its .5% per year, up to a max of 50% depreciation. When it comes to ACV its better to be a little over insured than underinsured because if your underinsured you may get penalties on top of depreciation when you dont carry a minimum amount of coverage to satisfy the contract with the insurance company (called coinsurance penalties).

Ok, here it goes. RC is replacement cost and ACV is actual cash value.

RC=190,000, Depreciation for frame=50% (54 years times 1% stop at max 50%), Depreciation for brick=27% (54yrs x .5%)

So then you take the depreciation amount off of the replacement cost for your insured value.

$190,000x50%=$85,000 (This happens to be the depreciation amount and the value because its exactly half)

$190,000x.27%=$51,300 (That is the amount the RC is reduced by so the home should be insured for $138,700)

So if you have a partial claim lets say for $10,000, the depreciation still applies. With a frame home the payout would be $5,000 minus the deductible and a brick home would be $7,300 minus deductible.

Now this is all a best guess at what your ACV could be. A claims adjuster would come through at the time of a claim and depreciate everything according to age and care to determine a value.

All that being said, being insured for RC while the company will only pay ACV means you are probably over-insured. From a claims perspective you will be fine. The problem is you are paying premiums for $190,000 of coverage when the carrier is not going to pay that out when you have a claim.

Hopefully this reply is useful for you.

Loading replies...