Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Wholesaling
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5
Posts
0
Votes
Johnathan B.
  • Puyallup, WA
0
Votes |
5
Posts

Has anyone tried slydial on vacant properties?

Johnathan B.
  • Puyallup, WA
Posted

I have a list of about 3,600 vacant homes within 14 miles of my zip code and phone numbers for a little over half of them. I am considering using slydial broadcast to send a pre-recorded voicemail to these numbers saying "Hey my name is Johnathan I live nearby in (city). I was driving by your house and noticed it might be vacant. I just wanted to get in touch and see if you'd be interested in selling it to me. I'd like to pay all-cash for it. Please call me back" and blast that out to a ton of numbers automatically. I figure it is more efficient to do it this way than driving around to find a fraction of the number of vacant homes in my area and then send a mailer out that will just get thrown away. Does anyone have experience with this?

Loading replies...