Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Legal & Legislation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated 12 months ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
0
Votes
Gary Fox
0
Votes |
17
Posts

Ownership by Contributed Capital vs by Tax Capital Accounts in small syndications

Gary Fox
Posted

Found this site looking for a JD or CPA (or JD/CPA) to answer one question.  Sole manager for these (small, < 2.5M in investor funds max) syndications has been convinced by his CPA that the only IRS-compliant method for determining ownership is by conversion to tax K-1 capital accounts.  (Some properties have negative cap accounts at this point.)  Structure:  Manager receives syndication *ownership* shares via sweat equity and all the investors obtain shares by purchase.  I need independent verification that the manager is correct and, if not correct (and I believe he is wrong) then an e-letter to the manager telling him that.  (My current real estate attny is not sufficiently versed in newer tax law to make this determination without input.)  The OA is silent on the method of ownership.  The sole manager can amend the OA, and could simply state that Contributed Capital ownership represents the true economics of the partnership.  Of course, willing to pay a reasonable fees for advice and generation of letter.  Anyone have knowledge that can be helpful, any JD/CPAs on the site, or can point me in the right direction?  Thanks.  

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

265
Posts
173
Votes
Bruce D. Kowal
#3 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Metro NY + New Bedford
173
Votes |
265
Posts
Bruce D. Kowal
#3 Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation Contributor
  • Metro NY + New Bedford
Replied

I wonder if that would merit a Change of Accounting Method filing. By the way, I had something similar back in 2009, well almost similar. A Client was a Member in an LLC. He was not the Managing Member, just an Ole Member, like you and the other investors. Well, the Managing Member, the SOB, upon a receiving a large capital gain from sale of property [a §1231 gain] took the unusual and selfish step of grabbing most of the proceeds [damn the OA], and for good measure allocating a lot of gain to Members [again, damn OA].

What to do?  Good question, right?  April 15 approaching, who the Heck wants to start hiring lawyers.  Right?

Well, the best tool in my toolkit is Form 8082  Notice of Inconsistent Treatment.  https://www.irs.gov/forms-pubs/about-form-8082

You file this, and let IRS deal with it, if they even want to.  In other words, you enter the K-1 information the way you think it should be.  And. . . . just to be really clever.   Paper file the return, with the Form 8082 as the last page.  And make sure your CPA hits the button for every possible sub schedule.   Enough said. Can't give away all my tricks for free.  

Loading replies...