Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
First-Time Home Buyer
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

4
Posts
2
Votes
Nick Moran
2
Votes |
4
Posts

5% down vs. 20% down?

Nick Moran
Posted

I am shopping for a duplex in Salt Lake City, as a first time purchase and house hack. My game plan has been to put 5% down with an FHA loan. However, I am having trouble finding any properties where the numbers work, and questioning whether I should put 20% down in order to cover my expenses.

I am focusing on good areas of the city, as this is intended to be a long term buy and hold. I plan to rent to long term tenants. I run a small business that takes much of my time, so my time (and experience) is limited. My initial plan has been to put 5% down, and once the dust has settled on the purchase, and my costs are stabilized/more foreseeable, invest a good chunk of the remainder of my nest egg into index funds. 

I may be able to make 20% down work on the most inexpensive options in the areas I am looking, however it will stretch the limits of my nest egg (to clarify, I would be leaving a personal safety buffer/slush fund, and not spending my last dollars on downpayment. But I would likely not have money left over for investing in index funds, or for much improvements to the property if they are needed). 

I don't intend to change the areas I am shopping in order to achieve better ROI - I want to stay focused on good areas of the city. My metrics for a 'good deal' would be to cover cost of mortgage + reasonable expectation for expenses. I am not concerned with initial cashflow, as long as I am not purchasing a cash drain.

It may be that I simply need to hunt harder or get more creative to find a deal under market value. My concern with this is that it may keep me on the sidelines much longer. 

On the flip side, the duplexes that are listed, in which the numbers don't seem to make sense, continue to go under contract - the numbers make sense for someone. Do I need to suck it up and pay 20% like investors are expected to, and breathe easy knowing I am not over-leveraging myself, and not wasting money on MIP?

I make enough money from my business to live on. I am not seeking cashflow. Rather, I am seeking to build equity and long-term wealth as well as eventual retirement support, as my current business would not allow for any income once I take my foot off the gas. 

Any thoughts from the more seasoned folks out there? Thank you for any wisdom you might share!

Nick

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

179
Posts
98
Votes
Bryan Martin
  • Accountant
  • Springfield, IL
98
Votes |
179
Posts
Bryan Martin
  • Accountant
  • Springfield, IL
Replied
Quote from @Nathan Grabau:

I recommend that clients have slightly negative cash flow at 5% down vs having slightly positive or break even cash flow at 20%. NoCo like SLC is a appreciation market, so we benefit from our battle being won with long term value growth vs cash flow. I am not sure if I would put the other 15% into an index fund, maybe a mix into a CD and index fund. Even though I am bullish on the stock market and have a actively managed stock portfolio next to my RE holdings, the reason I would keep the cash is as a front line of defense. A lot of people like to consider cash flow their front line of defense, but the truth is, cash actually is. If you have a property that cash flows 250 a month vs -100 a month, being in the cash flow positive situation does not help you if you have no cash when 2 furnaces, a main line, and hot water heater go out in the same week. If you have the cash, lets say it is 15% of 750k for a duplex, that 112.5k, allows you to handle almost anything that is thrown at you with that property. 


I tend to agree with Nathan's line of thinking here.  Cashflow is great, but if you're buying in SLC, your goal is to have appreciation be your big winner.  Even at 20%, with interest rates as high as they are, I doubt there would be much cash flow.  Not the same advice that I would give everyone, but if you have other sources of income and don't need the cash flow from the rental property, than you should be fine.

business profile image
Taxstra PLLC
5.0 stars
111 Reviews

Loading replies...